Monday, June 16, 2008

Enemies of the Catholic Church -Tuesday 16 June -Feria Day


AA-1025______________________________


The book "AA-1025 - The Memoirs of an anti-apostle", written by Marie Carre, is the diary of a man named Michael, a communist agent who had infiltrated the Catholic Priesthood. The diary was discovered by a Catholic nurse after his death, and subsequently published. The number 1025 allotted to him, meant that there already were 1024 Communist infiltrators inside the Catholic Church by the 1940's, and that some had even reached the rank of Bishop and Cardinal.
____________________________________

The following quotes are taken from the book:
____________________________________

On The Mass:

"The professor [who was also a communist agent] also taught me a reasonable way to say mass, since in six years I would be obliged to say it. While waiting for a deep modification of the whole ceremony, he never pronounced the words of the Consecration. But so as not to be suspected, he pronounced words almost similar, at least according to the ending of the words. He advised me to do the same."









[ Traditional Mass celebrated by Fr. Meuli , Titirangi , Auckland, New Zealand on the Octave of the Immaculate Conception, 14 Dec, 2007. ]



____________

"...All that made this ceremony look like a sacrifice should, little by little, be suppressed. The whole ceremony should represent only a meal, as among Protestants. He even assured me that it should never have been otherwise. He also worked at the elaboration of a new Ordinary of the Mass and advised me to do the same also, because it appeared to him to be altogether desirable to present to people a large number of diversified masses."

"It would do some good that a prophecy be sent throughout the world that would be the following : 'Some day, you will see married priests and mass said in vernacular tongues.'
I remember with joy that I was the first one to say these things in 1938. That same year, I urged women to ask for the priesthood. And I advocated a mass, not parochial, but a family mass that would be said at home, by the father and mother, before each meal.
____________________________________

On Holy Scripture:

"In Rome, I had very interesting conversations with a professor who would be mine, when I would have received the priesthood. He was a member of our network. He was very optimistic. He had specialized in Holy Scripture and was working at a new translation of the Bible in English.

The most astounding thing was that he had chosen a Lutheran pastor as his only collaborator. The said pastor, besides, was no more in accord with his own church which seemed old-fashioned to him."

"This collaboration, of course, remained secret. The aim of these two men was to rid humanity of all the systems which it had given itself through the Bible, and especially the New Testament. Thus, the virginity of Mary, the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist and His Resurrection, according to them, were to be put in parenthesis and finally were to end up in a simple suppression. The dignity of modern man, in their eyes, was worth such a price."

"The modernization of God's Word often allowed to diminish the Church's obstinacy. And that was done in a very natural way. These new translations, besides, facilitated the Biblical dialogues upon which we laid great hopes....one of my preferred dialogues concerned the Pope, because this personage is really an obstacle to me. When I say 'this personage', I mean also the texts upon which his title is based.

Those texts are also as embarrassing for me as they are for the Separated Christians (as they say). I am very grateful to the one who thought that the word 'prevail' has become incomprehensible to the modern man and has replaced it by 'be able'.

Instead of 'the gates of Hell will never prevail against it (the Church)', he has written : 'The gates of Hell will never be able to do anything against it.' This makes my Biblical dialogues much easier, at least in French speaking countries. Each one notices very quickly that this prophecy, which pretends that hell can do nothing against the Church, is absolutely false, and every one breathes at ease, because thus withers away this secular belief in a divine protection which, definitely, would always favor the efforts of Catholics (to be understood: never those of Heretics!).
___________________________________________

"On the Pope:

"About the time I was playing with confession, I was particularly sensitive to one point of doctrine, I mean to say 'the holy virtue of obedience' (as they say.) This obedience especially concerns the Pope. I was turning this problem over and at all its angles, without being able to understand .... I was therefore obliged to ask our services to see to it that the confidence shown to the Pope by Catholics be ridiculed discreetly on every possible occasion. I did not ignore that I was asking them something very difficult. But, all in all, it seemed primordial to me to incite Catholics to criticize the Pope."

"Someone was charged to watch attentively all the Vatican writings, in order to detect even very small details capable of displeasing one category of individuals. The quality of those who criticize the Pope does not matter, the only important thing is that he be criticized. The ideal thing, of course, would be that he displeased everybody, that is, reactionaries as well as modernists.
__________________________________________

"On the Protestantization of the Church:

"It was during those days that I launched on the market (we could almost say) the programme that would allow Catholics to be accepted by Protestants .... Catholics had hoped too much for the return of Protestantism to the fold of the Mother Church. It was time that they should lose their arrogance. Charity made it a duty for them. When charity is at stake, I pretended, laughing up my sleeve, nothing wrong can happen."

"I prophesied with assurance, so that this would be repeated in the same tones, the suppression of Latin, of priestly ornaments, of statues and images, of candles and prie-dieu (so that they could kneel no more) .... And I also started a very active campaign for the suppression of the Sign of the Cross."

"I also prophesied, and we were then in 1940, the disappearance of altars, replaced by a table completely bare, and also of all the crucifixes, in order that Christ be considered as a man, not as a God. I insisted that Mass be only a community meal to which all would be invited, even unbelievers. And came to the following prophecy:

[ Bare table replaces altar in Novus Ordo church- Good Shepherd "Catholic" Church, Auckland , New Zealand]
___________________________________

Baptism, for the modern man, has become ridiculously magical. Whether given by immersion or not, Baptism must be abandoned in favor of an Adult Religion."

"Moreover, all that is permitted among Protestants, even if only in one sect, must be authorized among Catholics, that is the remarriage of divorcees, polygamy, contraception and euthanasia.
__________________________________________

"On the Eucharist and intercommunion:

"When Catholics will see Protestants receive Communion at their masses, without having been converted, they will no longer have confidence in their 'Real Presence.' It will be explained to them that this Presence only exists in so far as it is believed. Thus they will feel themselves to be creators of all their religion..."

"To weaken more the notion of the 'Real Presence' of Christ, all decorum will have to be set aside.

No more costly embroidered vestments, no more music called sacred, especially no more Gregorian chant, but a music in jazz style, no more sign of the Cross, no more genuflections, but only dignified stern attitudes ....

[ Clown 'Mass' - whacky and wild, Oakland, California]

Moreover, the faithful will have to break themselves the habit of kneeling, and this will be absolutely forbidden when receiving Communion ....
___________________________________











[Traditional Latin Mass -Fr. De Pauw, Ave Maria Chapel, New York]





Very soon, the Host will be laid in the hand in order that all notion of the Sacred be erased."

"In order to destroy all sacredness, the priest will be invited to say the whole Mass in vernacular and especially to recite the words of the Consecration as a narration, which they are in reality.
He must not, above all, pronounce the following words: 'This is my Body, this is my Blood,' as if he really took the place of Christ Who pronounced them."

"Let everyone feel that the priest is reading a narration. Furthermore, there must never be question of a Sacrifice, that is, a Mass-Sacrifice, a non-bloody renovation of the Sacrifice of the Cross. No Protestant accepts this formula. Mass must only be a community meal for the greatest welfare of human fraternity.


[ Novus Ordo - Bicycle 'Mass']
_____________________________________________

"On the Sacraments:

"Afterwards, come the Seven Sacraments, which are all to be revised, all the more so that Protestants only have two. All Christians, of all denominations, have kept Baptism, but, for my part, it is the Sacrament that I would like to see disappear first. This seems relatively easy. It is too childish a Sacrament. Almost as childish as the Sign of the Cross and Holy Water."

"Of course, the Sacrament of Confirmation, which pretends to give the Holy Spirit and can be administered only by a bishop, must be suppressed with energy. This attitude will allow to denounce the dogma of the Holy Trinity as offensive to Jews and Moslems, as well as to certain new Protestant Sects."

"As for the Sacrament called Penance, it would be replaced by a community ceremony, which will only be an examination of conscience directed by a well trained priest, all of which would be followed by a general absolution, as in some Protestant Churches."

"As for the Sacrament of Extreme-Unction, we will have to find another word for it.... I would willingly choose the expression 'Sacrament of the Sick,' and to avoid the idea of Eternal Life, it would be allowed to offer this Sacrament, even in case of a light illness."

"As to the Sacrament of Holy Orders, which confers the power to exercise clerical functions, we will evidently have to keep it. In our Universal Church we will need priests who will be teachers of some Socialist doctrine.... And, of course, marriage will not be refused to the priests who ask for it, not any more than the Sacrament of Holy Orders will be refused to women."[ "Roman Catholic Bishopesses" - German Weekly, Der Spiegel.( NOT KIDDING!) Performed on a boat, on the Bodensee ,( a lake shared by Germany, Austria and Switzerland)...in
2006...another one completed! Caption should read..."Grannies gone wild on the road to Hell!"]








[Oopsie! Who left the wine bottle out? Do we call them "Mother" or "Father?". (How do you spell 'idiots'?)... "Do hope you remembered, Gertrud. I don't like apple in my struddle"...(he,he,he)]

"No, civil marriage only would be allowed. Thus, this Church, basely authoritative, could not forbid any more divorce and the remarriage of divorcees....I know well that Jesus of Nazareth has spoken in opposition to this opinion. But I have already said elsewhere that we must know what to choose in his teachings that is suitable to modern man.






[He,he,he...oops, sorry!...but they are truly pathetic...and they think they are still Catholic?]____________


"On devotion to Mary and the Saints:

"At that time, I showed great energy to destroy Marian devotion. I insisted greatly upon the grief that Catholics and Orthodoxes caused to Protestants by keeping up their numerous devotions to the Virgin Mary. I pointed out that the dear separated brethren were more logical and wiser.

This human creature about whom we know almost nothing becomes, in our Church, in some way, more powerful than God (or, at least, more gentle ).... I stressed upon the fact that many Protestants believe that Mary had other children after Jesus...Human oddness has no limit. All this strengthens my conviction, that to deny the virginity of Mary is the safest way to transform Christians into disciples of a man who would not at all be God. Who does not see how useful it is to kill Jesus of Nazareth before killing God?"

"I therefore advocated the suppression of the Rosary and of the numerous feast days reserved to Mary... As for all other things, it will be necessary to make those who keep on reciting the Rosary feel guilty."

"Afterwards, to bluntly suppress the cult of the Saints. The Saints must disappear before God, although it is much easier to kill God than His Saints...Then, we will proceed to suppress Judgement, Heaven, Purgatory and Hell. This is all very easy... Many are well disposed to believe that the Goodness of God surpasses all crimes. All we have to do is to insist on this Goodness. A God Whom no one fears, quickly becomes a God about whom no one thinks. Such was the end to be reached. "

"Such is the compendium of the orders which I sent throughout the world."

-Finis-

-Marie Carre’s book, published in 1972, available from Tan Books.
____________________________________

[Editor: Note how many of theses objectives have been successfully carried out by the enemies of the Catholic Church; the church which many Catholics today perceive as the Catholic Church, but is, in reality a counterfeit church in Rome, in place of the true church of Jesus Christ . This false counterfeit church was installed in Rome at the 1958 ‘election’ of the freemasonic antipope John XXIII –( article covering this event coming up very shortly)]

_________________________________________________

6 comments:

Joe of St. Thérèse said...

I wouldn't go so far as to call the new Mass invalid and the reasons for it are as follows.

1. In the Eastern Catholic Churches, they do NOT have the mysterium Fidei in the consecration of the wine, and theirs is completely valid.
2. The for all is a mistranslation of the pro-multis which is retained in the Latin Consecration formula for the new Mass.
3. To say that the new Mass is invalid is to say the gates of Hell prevailed against the Church. That would in fact make Jesus a liar. God would not keep his Church away from the Sacraments period.
4. In Sacred Scripture, the Mysterium Fidei, and pro multis are not in all of the formulas for consecration. As shown here (DRB)
In the Gospel of St. Matthew Ch. 26 verse 26-28 it states: And whilst they were at supper, Jesus took bread, and blessed, and broke: and gave to his disciples, and said: Take ye, and eat. This is my body.And taking the chalice, he gave thanks, and gave to them, saying: Drink ye all of this.For this is my blood of the new testament, which shall be shed for many unto remission of sins.
In The Gospel of St. Mark Ch. 14:22-24 state: And whilst they were eating, Jesus took bread; and blessing, broke, and gave to them, and said: Take ye. This is my body. And having taken the chalice, giving thanks, he gave it to them. And they all drank of it. And he said to them: This is my blood of the new testament, which shall be shed for many.
In the Gospel of St. Luke 22:19-20: And taking bread, he gave thanks, and brake; and gave to them, saying: This is my body, which is given for you. Do this for a commemoration of me. In like manner the chalice also, after he had supped, saying: This is the chalice, the new testament in my blood, which shall be shed for you.
In the 1st Letter of St. Paul to the Corinthians 11:24-25: And giving thanks, broke, and said: Take ye, and eat: this is my body, which shall be delivered for you: this do for the commemoration of me. In like manner also the chalice, after he had supped, saying: This chalice is the new testament in my blood: this do ye, as often as you shall drink, for the commemoration of me.
In mass, the following words are said "On the night he was betrayed, he took the bread, and gave you thanks and praise and said "Take this all of you and eat it, this is my body which will be given up for you. In the same way he took the cup, again he gave you thanks and praise and said "Take this all of you and drink from it, this is my blood, the blood of the new and everlasting covenant, it will be shed for you and for all so that sins may be forgiven. Do this in memory of me"

As you see, the pro multis is only in 2 of the 4 accounts written in Sacred Scripture. We know that Sacred Scripture is infallible when it comes to Faith and Morals, so these can not be wrong, thus we know that the Mysterium Fidei, pro vobis et pro multis part of the consecration is extra are not the words of consecration. (This not to say I don't think they shouldn't be there, because I do)

Now that being said, the NO is Theologically weaker than the TLM and I prefer the TLM to the NO anyday of the week (yes, even low Mass).

The new Mass is indeed a seperate rite. Pope Benedict knows this. Although in SP he has made it juristicial instead of a matter of rites as time killing.

I do believe the day will come when the TLM will be the Ordinary for the Latin Rite of the Church.

Vatican II was NOT an infallible council as it was pastoral. It is unfortunate people treat it as it's the only council that exists in the Church. To interpret things correctly in the Church we must interpret them in light of Tradition, which is exactly what Pope Benedict is doing.

Sorry for the long comment, but I had to say it. You're well within your rights as a lay perosn to question VII, which I do from time to time on my own blog.

catholic2007 said...

Hi, Joe of st.therese,

Thank you for your comments...

I must admit that I am at a bit of a loss trying to understand which bit of Pope Pius V's "Quo Primum "and "De Defectibus" you have trouble understanding?...Quo Primum of Pius V forbids anyone ever changing the Mass and if they did they would incur the wrath (anger) of Almighty God and the blessed Apostles Peter and Paul!

Similarly, De Defectibus dicusses certain defects which could arise in the celebration of Mass,( which included leaving things out and changing words in the words of the consecration so that the meaning is altered,)then the sacrament would not be confected! Defects were described in detail so the priest would say Mass in the same manner...

However, that being the case ,having looked at some of the comments you made, I will attempt to answer some of your claims...

Firstly, I can reassure you that the New "Mass" is indeed invalid...

The original Latin version of the New "Mass" has removed the words "mysterium fidei" -"the mystery of faith"- from the words of consecration. This causes a grave doubt, because "mysterium fidei' is part of the form in the Roman Rite.

Though the words "mysterium fidei" are not part of some of the Eastern Rite formulas of consecration, they have been declared to be part of the Roman Rite.They are also found in some Eastern Rites.

Pope Innocent III and the cannon of the Mass also tell us that the words "mysterium fidei" were given by Jesus Christ Himself.

Pope Innocent III, Cum Marthae circa, Nov, 29, 1202:...In the canon of the Mass that expression
'mysterium fidei", is found interposed among the words...Therefore we believe that the form of words , as they are found in the Canon, the Apostles received from Christ, and their successors from them."

That the "for all" being a mis translation,or (more truthfully deliberately changed to mean something completely different) from the original Latin in the New "Mass", doesn't make the New Mass valid.

For a start, nobody says the New "Mass" in the Latin language (not that I have heard of) and besides how many so called N.O. "priests'(oops,sorry, presbyters) would know how to say it anyhow?. Most of them wouldn't even be validly ordained,anycase ...{Future article to be posted on invalidity of new rite of ordinations and consecrations of bishops to be posted shortly]...

The "gates of Hell" have been defined by the Catholic Church as the 'death dealing tongues of Heretics"...somebody who denies just one truth of the Catholic Church, thereby falling outside of the Catholic Church, and into the everlasting flames of Hell unless they convert before their death!

On the contrary, to say that the New "Mass" is valid after seeing all the evidence against its validity is to fall into Heresy...

The fact that God might with hold his Sacrament from Catholics for a period of time is not unheard of...The Japanese had no sacraments for more than 300 years but that did not stop being Catholic... you can save your soul from Hell without the Mass so long as you stay in the state of grace...

Remember that the first Mass and Masses said by the Jesus Christ and the Apostles occurred many years before the first gospels were completed. In fact after His Resurrection,Our Lord taught the Apostles how to say Mass.[Now that is a long time before the scriptures were completed.St. Justin the Martyr(in his writings (155A.D.)...

In the form of the Consecration, the Council of Trent explains the words Our Lord used and meant in the Consecration in the Mass:

The Catechism of the Council of Trent, On the form of the Eucharist, p 227; "The additional words "for you and for many" are taken , some from Matthew, some from Luke, but were joined together by the catholic Church,under the guidance of the Spirit of God.

THEY SERVE TO DECLARE THE FRUIT AND ADVANTAGE OF HIS PASSION. For if we look to its value , we must confess that the Redeemer shed His Blood for the salvation of all;

but if we look to the fruit which mankind has received from it , we shall easily find that it pertains not to all, but to many of the human race...WITH REASON, THEREFORE, WERE THESE WORDS FOR ALL NOT USED...."

As you can see the words "for all" were not used by Our Lord, specifically because they woud give a false meaning...

Other things to conclude this short reply(he,he,he)...

Well, no... I think I will leave it till a future posting on "Antipopes of the Vatican II Church" and whether "Vatican II was infallible"(depends on which way you look at it (VatII)...

So, keep tuned....

Thanks again for your comments...

catholic2007 said...

Hi, Joe of st.therese,

Thank you for your comments...

I must admit that I am at a bit of a loss trying to understand which bit of Pope Pius V's "Quo Primum "and "De Defectibus" you have trouble understanding?...Quo Primum of Pius V forbids anyone ever changing the Mass and if they did they would incur the wrath (anger) of Almighty God and the blessed Apostles Peter and Paul!

Similarly, De Defectibus dicusses certain defects which could arise in the celebration of Mass,( which included leaving things out and changing words in the words of the consecration so that the meaning is altered,)then the sacrament would not be confected! Defects were described in detail so the priest would say Mass in the same manner...

However, that being the case ,having looked at some of the comments you made, I will attempt to answer some of your claims...

Firstly, I can reassure you that the New "Mass" is indeed invalid...

The original Latin version of the New "Mass" has removed the words "mysterium fidei" -"the mystery of faith"- from the words of consecration. This causes a grave doubt, because "mysterium fidei' is part of the form in the Roman Rite.

Though the words "mysterium fidei" are not part of some of the Eastern Rite formulas of consecration, they have been declared to be part of the Roman Rite.They are also found in some Eastern Rites.

Pope Innocent III and the cannon of the Mass also tell us that the words "mysterium fidei" were given by Jesus Christ Himself.

Pope Innocent III, Cum Marthae circa, Nov, 29, 1202:...In the canon of the Mass that expression
'mysterium fidei", is found interposed among the words...Therefore we believe that the form of words , as they are found in the Canon, the Apostles received from Christ, and their successors from them."

That the "for all" being a mis translation,or (more truthfully deliberately changed to mean something completely different) from the original Latin in the New "Mass", doesn't make the New Mass valid.

For a start, nobody says the New "Mass" in the Latin language (not that I have heard of) and besides how many so called N.O. "priests'(oops,sorry, presbyters) would know how to say it anyhow?. Most of them wouldn't even be validly ordained,anycase ...{Future article to be posted on invalidity of new rite of ordinations and consecrations of bishops to be posted shortly]...

The "gates of Hell" have been defined by the Catholic Church as the 'death dealing tongues of Heretics"...somebody who denies just one truth of the Catholic Church, thereby falling outside of the Catholic Church, and into the everlasting flames of Hell unless they convert before their death!

On the contrary, to say that the New "Mass" is valid after seeing all the evidence against its validity is to fall into Heresy...

The fact that God might with hold his Sacrament from Catholics for a period of time is not unheard of...The Japanese had no sacraments for more than 300 years but that did not stop being Catholic... you can save your soul from Hell without the Mass so long as you stay in the state of grace...

Remember that the first Mass and Masses said by the Jesus Christ and the Apostles occurred many years before the first gospels were completed. In fact after His Resurrection,Our Lord taught the Apostles how to say Mass.[Now that is a long time before the scriptures were completed.St. Justin the Martyr(in his writings (155A.D.)...

In the form of the Consecration, the Council of Trent explains the words Our Lord used and meant in the Consecration in the Mass:

The Catechism of the Council of Trent, On the form of the Eucharist, p 227; "The additional words "for you and for many" are taken , some from Matthew, some from Luke, but were joined together by the catholic Church,under the guidance of the Spirit of God.

THEY SERVE TO DECLARE THE FRUIT AND ADVANTAGE OF HIS PASSION. For if we look to its value , we must confess that the Redeemer shed His Blood for the salvation of all;

but if we look to the fruit which mankind has received from it , we shall easily find that it pertains not to all, but to many of the human race...WITH REASON, THEREFORE, WERE THESE WORDS FOR ALL NOT USED...."

As you can see the words "for all" were not used by Our Lord, specifically because they woud give a false meaning...

Other things to conclude this short reply(he,he,he)...

Well, no... I think I will leave it till a future posting on "Antipopes of the Vatican II Church" and whether "Vatican II was infallible"(depends on which way you look at it (VatII)...

So, keep tuned....

Thanks again for your comments...

catholic2007 said...

Hey,
I got three comments...[but really,have'nt worked out how to get rid of unwanted ones without enabling moderating thingy]...now I got FOUR!

BENARD said...

Then please what do you advise or what solution do you provide to a stranded person like me yet a staunch Catholic, so that I can follow atleast the trace of the true Catholic faith as required by the teachings of our Lord Jesus Christ, if it is still possible? Are`t we doomed we God seekers of this generation? What can we do if even the Bible is tampered with according to the arrogant quotings from this communist about changing the verse `Hell will not dwell over it`? Please Am at ssegujjabenard@gmail.com

catholic2007 said...

Hi BENARD,

If, as you say you are a 'staunch Catholic,'then you already have the answer...

You should be staying away from the New Mass, and the Vatican II church, staying in the state of grace, and saying the full Rosary daily, and there are places to go to receive the Sacraments from validly ordained Catholic priests - check out with MHFM for more details.

Thus, if you are a true Catholic you are not stranded - you simply belong to the Remnant Catholic of the last days - of which you should be greatful!