This blog site is devoted to the defence of the Holy Roman Catholic Church, by exposing the false and invalid Second Vatican Council as a non-Catholic heretical Council. We have zeroed in on the one piece of arsenal which most of us have overlooked and failed to employ over these past 40 years since the Vatican II sect was installed in Rome. The one weapon that strikes more terror into the enemies of the Church is the Bulla of Pope Pius II, Execrabilis, which he issued on February 15th, 1460.
I. Childhood - Setting the scene up to the first of 18 apparitions of the Blessed Virgin Mary to Bernadette.
Saint Bernadette Soubirous, was born on the 7th January, 1844 in Lourdes, population of about 4000, and not far from Tarbes, in southern France close to the Spanish border, and baptized two days later, her baptismal name being Marie Bernarde; in Lourdes she was always known by the graceful diminutive, Bernadette.
This is the story of a 14 year old peasant girl raised in dire poverty and unable to read, to whom Our Lady appeared eighteen times to Bernadette, and who later became a nun in the convent of Nevers, where she reached such holiness that God saw fit to preserve her body incorrupt to this day.
Bernadette's father, Francois Soubirious was a miller and at the time of Bernadette's birth he was twice the age of his wife, Louise. Both were outstanding and devout Catholics in which Mass and daily recitation of the Rosary of the Blessed Virgin, morning and night prayers were part of their daily lives.
Bernadette's parents- Francois and Louise Soubirous
Early Home Life In The Mill
The house Bernadette was born in was a mill called the Boly, named after an English doctor who owned it in the seventeenth century, and was located along with six other mills to the north of Lourdes along the banks of a tributary of the Gave River.
Bernadette's birth place - the Boly mill
It was not a large one, and before Bernadette's father, Francois Soubirous married, he helped out at the Latour mill which was leased by his parents, Joseph and Marie Soubirous.
He became engaged to Louise Casterot the daughter of the Casterots who owned the Boly mill, and eventually the married couple took over the Boly mill and paid rent to Louise's mother, after madam Casterot's husband died.
Bernadette's parents, Francoise and Louise Soubirous were married in 1843, and nine children were born of their marriage, five of whom died in their childhood. Bernadette being the eldest, was a strong healthy child up until the age of six, but unfortunately suffered from asthma which was to trouble her for the rest of her life.
She was, nevertheless, a lovable child with a sweet smile, but her growth was somewhat retarded, and choking fits frequently pulled her up in the midst of her games.
In spite of all this, she was already making herself useful in the house taking care of her little sister, Toinette who was two and a half years younger than herself.
Marie Antoinette "Toinette" Soubirous
The departure of Grandmother Casterot from the mill, who had been living with them and helping run the mill, being experienced in handling the affairs of the mill, keeping accounts and mill bookings for the patrons, was sorely missed by both Francois and Louise Soubirous who both could not read or write.
The demise of the mill was partly the blame of the generosity of both Francois and Louise, who often used to cancel certain debts out of charity, and besides, they were soon unable to afford to replace worn-out sifters for the mill.
In 1854, when Bernadette was ten and a half years old, the owner of the Boly mill (Abadie-Boly, to whom the Casterots were paying a rental for the use of the Boly mill) decided to get rid of the mill.
Madame Casterot decided to rent in her name, the Laborde- Louisel mill to house and provide for the whole family. The mill had a very small output and had to compete against the larger neighboring mills, and Francois had to take on odd jobs to make ends meet.
The winter of 1854 on the feast of Friday 8 December passed completely unnoticed by the poor Soubirous. There was no time to think about the celebrations taking place in Rome where Pope Pius IX pronounced ' the Virgin Mary was preserved from the stain of original sin from the moment of her conception.'
Pope Pius IX
At the Laborde mill, it was a struggle to provide for their daily bread, and another mouth had to be fed after Justin Soubirous was born on February 28, 1855.
Bernadette had just turned eleven.
In watching her own dear family suffer and in her own sufferings, Bernadette matured early, becoming detached from the world. Small in build and racked by asthma, she took on tasks seemingly beyond her strength. One can picture her holding in her arms the baby Justin. The other two, Jean-Marie and Toinette were a little wild, but the eldest sister knew how to scold them on occasions and make them obey her.
Louise Soubirous could take on work without anxiety for under Bernadette's care there would be no trouble at home.
The following delightful incident shows how Bernadette at such a tender age was as downright as she was sensible.
One day in July 1855, the mother had arranged with a cousin, Catherine Soubirous, and another Lourdes woman, to go and help out with the harvest in a field on the Mengalettes' farm.
Between nine and ten in the morning, Bernadette appeared on the doorstep with her baby brother in her arms. Romaine, the farmer's daughter was there and welcomed her. She was to remember this humble meeting all her life; she even noted that Bernadette, whose 'face was round and pretty, with lovely, very gentle eyes', had her usual kerchief on her head, a shawl over her shoulders, her bare feet in sabots, and her dress reaching down to the ground. She seemed tired, 'and there was every reason'.
'In she comes then,' relates Romaine Mengelatte, 'and very simply, very nicely, she says to us, "Would you kindly tell me where your field is? I must carry my little brother to my mother, for he wants to be suckled." '
A neighbor, who was also off to join the harvesters, took Bernadette at once to the Mengelattes' field.
On October 23, 1855 Louise's mother Claire Casterol passed away. Her experience was sorely missed by the Soubirous in the affairs of the mill.
From the division of the property Bernadette's parents strove to earn their daily bread rather than beg.
Francis rented a hut 3 miles east of Lourdes in Arcizac, and took charge of a mill near by. Louise took on jobs on the land when required.
The Sisters of Charity of Nevers had come to Lourdes in 1834, not far from Bernadette's home, and ran a school, however Bernadette seldom went to school as her duties of nursemaid did not allow her to go often, so she was unable to read.
Her only prayer book at Mass was a small rosary.
At home she was she was no trouble to anyone. I always found her good tempered and docile; when she was scolded she never answered back, her Aunt Bernarde was to later affirm.
In the course of 1856, the Soubirous were now at the end of their resources and had to leave Arcizac, where their next home was a wretched hovel room sublet to them in the Rue du Bough.
Bernadette was now twelve, and helped, together with Toinette, to keep the fire going and warm up the soup for the family.
This was an age of scant help for the poor.
From The Mill To The Dungeon
In 1856 around All Saint's Day, they would be seen loading a handcart with what remained of their furniture and crockery, their destination being the old prison or cachot. This prison was owned by Andre Sajous, a cousin of Louise who lived in it.
The cachot or dungeon where the Soubirous family were living at the time of the apparitions
Francois begged him to let the old dungeon to him. It comprised two floors, the first floor had two rooms occupied by Andre Sajous, while the ground floor was used as a workshop.
Jeanne Vedere spent a night there in 1858 and found they had 'absolutely nothing but some necessary bits of furniture and linen; 'there was a cupboard, a trunk, some chairs and three beds - one for the parents, one for the two girls and one for the two small boys.' - that left precious little space in this small home measuring four yards by five yards.
Francois continued to do odd jobs, while Louise went to the forest and did washing or charring in the town. Toinette had turn ten and attended the Sister' school fairly regularly.
Bernadette was repeatedly heard to say that books were not meant for her. She was now thirteen and the Sisters did not know quite know which class to put her; the most she managed was to scrawl rather badly, two or three letters on a slate..
Then there was the asthma, but above all she was needed at home.
Her little sister, Toinette, nearly eleven, could read, had better health and could easily have been taken for the eldest in the family, and also there was talk of her First Communion. Bernadette would have loved to go to catechism classes!
'Have patience, your turn will come,' her mother promised.
At night she would when her asthma prevented her from sleeping, she used to cry over the heart-breaking poverty of the home, over her ignorance and her frustrated longings. When morning came, once she had said her prayers, she regained her child-like gaiety. She would wash and dress her little brothers and join in their games.
'Never,' testified Andre Sajous, 'would you have heard them complain that they were hungry. But how often have I seen Bernadette, Jean-Marie and little Justin laugh and skip on an empty stomach!'
Bernadette - Shepherdess In The Hills Of Bartres
The Hills of Bartres where Bernadette was a shepherdess
Towards the end of June 1857, Bernadette's mother Louise decided it would be easier for Bernadette to attend school and catechism at Bartres, (roughly 3 km north of Lourdes), rather than Lourdes, and so the Lagues' servant, Jeanne - Marie Garros, came to Lourdes to fetch her, commenting, 'she hadn't much to pack,' said Jeanne-Marie, and more than once during her stay at Bartres, I lent her some of my linen while she washed her own.'
The Lagues had kept up their friendship with the Soubirous despite their poverty, and the foster-mother readily agreed to take Bernadette in as an extra servant without wages, of course, just out of friendship.
Bernadette was to look after the five little Lagues children, outside of school hours and Catechism, which attended regularly for some weeks, however, M. Lagues, being a practical man, noting that the servant, Jeanne-Marie did all the work of the house, decided, since Bernadette had little else to do, but take care of his children, she could take care of the lambs, for the Lagues owned a large flock of sheep, some cows and large scattered tracts of land.
'But what about school and Catechism?' protested Bernadette timidly.
'Don't worry at all,' the man replied; 'your foster-mother will arrange all that in good time.'
So now Bernadette became a shepherdess.
Bernadette-The Shepherdess
Up early in he morning she helped the mother to wash and dress the children, did the housework with Jeanne-Marie, and then made her way to the stable, accompanied by Pigou, one of the farm dogs, and together with the lambs they would go to the rolling hills. In a basket on her arm the little shepherd-girl carried her knitting, a garment to mend and provisions for the whole day.
Bernadette divided her time between work, play and saying her rosary on her cheap twopenny rosary which her mother had given her.
Her pleasures were as simple as her soul.
How silent it was on the slopes of this valley almost the whole day through. She would gaze beyond Lourdes, which she could no longer see, to the Pyrenees mountains, which she could view from the top of the valley, their peaks dusted with snow ... God made all that she said to herself, the God she understood was the Creator, and also the One who remained hidden in the Tabernacle of the church.
Hills of Bartres where Bernadette was a shepherdess
While she was saying her rosary her thoughts would also fly to the 'dungeon' in Lourdes, where her loved ones were down there in that gloomy hovel.
Francois Soubirous often took the time to visit his daughter as often as he could, and she welcomed him, with a cry of delight.
M. Lagues seldom sent Bernadette to school, and then only when he had to, as M. Lagues said, 'she looked after the sheep very well', which seemed to him to be a very good reason not to do so.
Towards the end of her life, Bernadette was asked if she went to school at Bartres. She replied, 'I scarcely ever went to the school, and when I did, I learnt nothing.' She also admitted she went only rarely to Catechism.
Shortly before Christmas 1857, Bernadette became homesick and wished to return to her family in Lourdes so that she could join a class and prepare for her First Communion.
Around the 28th of January, 1858, Bernadette returned home to Lourdes. She had just turned fourteen. She still looked no more than 'ten or eleven' - she had remained so small.
After embracing her family, Bernadette cried out joyfully: 'Now at last I shall be able to go to school and Catechism! That's why I have come back!'
The return of Bernadette to her family put an extra burden on their poverty, but they owed it to this much neglected child.
The next day Bernadette appeared at the Hospice school and the Sisters immediately enrolled her among the future First Communion class who were following the Catechism lessons given in the Hospice by the chaplain, Abbe Bertrand - Marie Pomian, the senoir curate to the parish priest, M Peyramale.
After the wide-open country and sunshine of the Bartres hill sides, to Bernadette at this point in time, they were not so dear to her as the narrow Rue-des-Petits-Fosses, the stuffy atmosphere and black-grimed beams of the dungeon.
But in this wall of gloom there would soon be a portal of light, for heaven had resolved to reveal itself once again on the soils of France.
'At fourteen, not knowing how to read or write, and a complete stranger to the French language and ignorant of the Catechism, Bernadette looked on herself as the most worthless child of her years.'
At the appointed hour a voice of exceeding sweetness confirmed the eternal choice. 'This one!'
__________________
II. The Apparitions Begin - First Apparition. Thursday 11th February, 1858.
Thursday, February 11th, 1858 dawned over Lourdes like other winter days; a veil of mist shrouded the town and the surrounding mountains.
The air was cold and damp; it was holiday time for the school-children, and Francois was tired and remained in bed that morning, however as soon as there was enough daylight the young Soubirous children were up and running about in that gloomy room.
Before 11 o'clock that morning, the mother was making ready to go out to gather firewood. Just as she was ready to leave, Jeanne Abadie, a class mate of Toinette, met her at the doorway and asked her where she was going. 'Where are you going to, Louise?' 'To the wood, ' the mother replied?
'We'll all go,' said Jeanne decisively, starring at both Bernadette and Toinette. 'Oh, yes!' they shouted, we'll all go. can't we Mamma?' Bernadette had a slight cold, and her mother objected saying it was too cold and damp for her.
'But, Mamma', Bernadette, the former shepherdess remarked, 'this sort of weather never stopped me going out at Bartres.'
'Very well, then!' Off you go with Jeanne and Toinette, but you must take the cape.'
At the dungeon they always spoke of the cape as there was only one, not a new one, but an old white one, much patched, having been bought at a second hand store opposite the church. Bernadette had washed it several times.
They wore sabots without stockings, but on account of her asthma, her mother made her wear stockings.
As they made their way a neighbor spotted the girls that morning and asked where they were going. They replied ,to get firewood.' The woman advised them to go M. de Laffitte's meadow, where the owner had been recently felling trees.
This meadow was reached by a foot bridge, enclosed on one side by the River Gave and the other side by a canal whose current worked the Savy flour mill.
A little below the mill, the Merlasse streamlet flowed into this canal, which eventually rejoined the stream by the base of the rocky promontory, called the Massabielle.
It was the first time Bernadette had ever entered these parts.
On this 11th day of February , 1858, the mill was idle, being under repair, and there was practically no flow of water.
The space left in front of the grotto was at low water was about five yards. At the entrance lay some scattered boulders. To the right of the cave, some three yards above the narrow bank, there was an oval recess.
From this cavity, the stems of several shrubs and the large branches of an eglantine forced their way out; they hung down very low along the rock.
In spring the wild rose bush was ablaze with white blossoms!
Jeanne Abadie relates that the water was knee deep, and was exceptionally low that day. To reach the grotto they had to wade across and the ice cold water brought tears to both Toinette and Jeanne's eyes.
Bernadettes dared not follow, obeying her mother's instructions, yet she needed to cross over to join up with Toinette and Jeanne, who by now were heading off to collect their faggots of firewood before Jeanne had called out to Bernadette to stay where she was.
Bernadette was now all alone.
Leaning against a boulder, a little to the right of the large cave, Bernadette had finally decided to take off her stockings in order to cross the stream to catch up with Toinette and Jeanne.
Now was to begin the series of wonders for which the unwittingly predestined child had come, a place she had no idea of going to, but where she was expected.
Bernadette's account of what followed:
I had hardly begun to take off my stocking when I heard the sound of wind, as in a storm. I turned towards the meadow and I saw the trees were not moving at all. I had half noticed, but without paying any particular heed, that the branches and bramble were waing besides the grotto.
I went on taking my stockings off, and was putting one foot into the water, when I heard the same sound in front of me. I lookd up and saw a cluster of branches and brambles underneath the topmost opening in the grotto tossing and swaying to and fro, though nothing else stirred all around.
Behind these branches and within the opening, I saw immediately a girl in white, no bigger than myself, who greeted me with a slight bow of the head, at the same time, she stretched out her arms slightly away from her body, opening her hands, as in pictures of Our Lady; over her right arm hung a rosary.
The Lady appears to Bernadette for the first time
[to be continued ...]
Photo of Bernadette when she was between 16 and 18 years old
Bernadette Soubirous in the grotto of Lourdes, October 1863.
One should be trying to say the 15 decade rosary every day and one
should not recite the Luminous Mysteries. They are not part of the true
Rosary. The reason Antipope John Paul II felt it was necessary to add
them is that he was a non-Catholic revolutionary who wanted to change
everything.[vaticancatholic.com]
_______________
Lourdes Hymn
Immaculate Mother [including New Zealand verse]
_______________
__________________
Special Update on the Fluoridation Controversy in New Zealand
“The British government has declared a Christian physician ‘unfit to
work’ after the self-identified Reformed Baptist vocalized out loud the
definitive truth that there are only two biological genders: male and
female.
According to reports, Dr. David Mackereth’s tenure within the
government-run health system of the United Kingdom was exceptionally
short-lived because of his position in support of the laws of nature,
which apparently no longer have a place in England.
Dr. Mackereth had originally been tasked with compiling independent
reports about the true health status of Brits claiming disability
benefits. Part of his assignment was to refer to interviewees only by
their preferred gender pronouns – something that he simply couldn’t do
because of his religious convictions.
‘I said that I had a problem with this,’ Dr. Mackereth told the
media. ‘I believe that gender is defined by biology and genetics, and
that as a Christian the Bible teaches us that God made humans male or
female. I could have kept my mouth shut but it was the right time to
raise it.’
Keep in mind that the 55-year-old had worked for the U.K.’s National
Health System (NHS) for some 26 years prior to being let go for holding
the apparently politically incorrect view that someone with male
genitalia is a man, and someone with female genitalia is a woman.
It’s not as if Dr. Mackereth had refused to evaluate self-identified
transgenders, or even insisted upon forcing his views on them…
‘I’m not attacking the transgender movement, but I am defending my
right to freedom of speech, and freedom of belief,’ Dr. Mackereth
reportedly told the DailyMailOnline.com.
‘I don’t think I should be compelled to use a specific pronoun. I am
not setting out to upset anyone. But if upsetting someone can lead to
doctors being sacked then, as a society, we have to examine where we are
going.’…
‘In 2018, if you are a Christian, or simply a person with logic and
commonsense, who dares to declare that there are only 2 genders, that is
hate speech,’ writes Geoffrey Grider…
‘Canada recently passed a law calling for jail time for people who
call someone by the ‘wrong pronoun,’ as well as a bill that allows the
government to seize children from parents who only acknowledge 2
genders.’
Meanwhile, Muslims are free to practice their religion in the U.K.,
and are being welcomed with open arms at the very same time that
Christians are being thrown in prison for practicing theirs.”
07/18/2018
'Oh, to be in England, now that the E.U. (Beast out of the Sea) is here ... '
Britain Now Police State As Denial Of Free Speech And Freedom Of Movement Denied Once Again To Tommy Robinson
______________________
_________________
Britain is Now A Police State- There Is No Freedom of Speech In The U.K.
_____________________
Britain Is Now A Totalitarian State!
_________________
The Stream That Got Tommy Arrested -Denial Of Freedom of Speech And Freedom Of Movement In A Totalitarian British State
______________
Islam - a false religion revealed by the false prophet Muhammad. It's followers are called Muslims, who follow the book called The Koran. Muslims reject the Trinity and Divinity of Christ. According to Catholic teaching, Islam is an abomination and a diabolical sect ( i.e. a sect of the Devil). Muslims are unbelievers ( infidels) who need to be converted for salvation.
Pope Eugene IV, Council of Basil, 1431:
" ... there is hope that very many from the abominable sect of Mahomet will be converted to the Catholic faith."
Pope Callixtus III: "I vow to... exalt the true Faith, and to extirpate the diabolical sect of the reprobate and faithless Mahomet [Islam] in the East."
The Vatican II sect heaps praise on Islam and considers it a good religion. vaticancatholic.com
"We Jews have spread the spirit of revolt and false liberalism among the nations of the gentiles, so as to persuade them away from their faith," [done] "and even make them ashamed of professing the precepts of their religion and obeying the commandments of the Church.' [done]
"We have brought many of them to boast of being atheists and more then that, to glory in being descendants of the ape.'
"We are the supreme Masters of peace and war. We can boast of being the Creators of the (Protestant) Reformation..."
- "The Jewish Peril & The Catholic Church|." -the London Catholic Gazette, 1936
____________
QUESTION: Who is behind the Mass Illegal Immigration in to the West to destroy West Christian Civilization?
The ANSWER should be patently obvious by now! Who is the paramount enemy of the Catholic Church, that is Christianity, who wish to obliterate any mention of the birth of Jesus Christ at Christmas time?
It is a war between Jesus Christ and His Church, the Catholic Church Outside of which there is no salvation, and Satan, with the Jews having been declared by Christ, 'the Synagogue of Satan.' Whose side are you on?
Exposing the Jews - An Unholy People In The Holy Land
The World Watches as Ahed Tamimi Confronts Israeli Invader of her home and freedom
_________________
A Caged Bird Sings
________________
Background Reading on Palestine and the Jews
__________________
JEWISH INVASION OF THE HOLY LAND
Four Men Who Built The Zionist State
Moses Hess
In the year 1862, a German named Moses Hess published at Paris a book called Rome and Jerusalem ...If modernZionism must be assigned a specific starting point, this was it.
Hess's message was straightforward: "Papal Rome," he writes, "symbolizes to the Jews an inexhaustible well of poison." But the Jews should not be discouraged. Hess continues. A "regeneration" of the world has been going on since the "great" French Revolution. Rome is already on the way down, he declares, and the job of the Jews is to establish Jerusalem in place of it.
Christianity will be "finally replaced among the regenerated nations by a new historical cult. To this cult , Judaism alone holds the key."
Hess nailed the whole argument in with the resounding blasphemy: "Every Jew has within him the potentiality of a Messiah, and every Jewess that of a Mater Dolorosa.. The Messianic Era is the present age."
There was no Jew in Europe who was not interested, but for many, Hess's call to arms was too dangerous, for there would be Christian resentment, they said, and all those liberties so lately acquired by the Jews as a result of Masonic revolutions, would be revoked.
The Jews however, of Eastern Europe, still confined in Polish and Russian ghettos, Moses Hess was a prophet. His book begot a dozen secret societies dedicated to a revived Jewish nationalism, and it set the stage for a more versatile Jewish leader.
Theodore Herzl
If Moses Hess was the violent revolutionist that Zionism needed to start it off,Theodore Herzl was the capable calculator who brought order to the Zionist frenzy, won for Zionism the support of Western Jews, and gave permanent direction to the Jewish resurgence by advocating the immediate establishment of a self-governing Jewish state.
With diabolical doggedness, Herzl peddled his plan for a Jewish homeland on every important doorstep in Europe. The Kaiser listened to him, and so did the King of Italy and the Sultan of Turkey. England offered him a piece of her own property in Uganda. But the Zionists were determined against second-class handouts. They wanted Palestine or nothing for their nation, and Jerusalem for their capital.
Herzl approached the even the Pope, Saint Pius X, to ask for support for a Jewish settlement in Palestine. To so fantastic a proposal, the Holy Father (says Herzl's Diaries): "answered in a stern and categorical manner: "We are unable to favor this movement. We cannot prevent the Jews from going to Jerusalem - but we could never sanction it. The ground of Jerusalem, if it were not always sacred, has been sanctified by the life of Jesus Christ. As the head of the Church, I cannot answer you otherwise. The Jews have not recognized Our Lord, therefore, we cannot recognize the Jewish people."
The Pope did not discount the possibility of some measure of success for Zionism, himself being the virtual prisoner of Italy's Masonic administrators, the offspring of those same Freemasons who previously had glorified in tearing down those ghetto walls and sacked the churches.
The Zionists were confident that when the desired circumstances do not present themselves on their own, they can be made to order. In a speech before the Sixth Zionist Congress in 1903, Herzl's Max Nordau, said ( and the year was 1903): "Let me tell you the following words as if I were showing you the rungs of a ladder leading upwards and upward: Herzl, the Zionist Congress, the English Uganda proposition, the future World War, the peace conference where, with the help of England, a free and Jewish Palestine will be created."
Chaim Weizmann
When the World War that Nordau had foretold eventually came, in 1914, Herzl was ten years dead, but a new Zionist leader was on hand to oversee the expected Jewish triumph.
This was Chaim Weizmann, an itinerant chemist who had moved from his native Russia to Manchester, England, sometime before the outbreak of the War.
It was Weismann's task to acquaint the British government with Jewish designs on the Holy Land. In exchange for an official smile on these Zionist ambitions, Weizmann could promise that his race - its financiers, presidential advisors, newspaper publishers and all - would join wholeheartedly in helping Britain win the war.
Consequently, on Nov. 2, 1917, the British Foreign Secretary, Lord Balfour, addressed a letter to Lord Rothschild, English representative of the powerful Jewish banking house.
"His Majesty's Government," wrote Balfour, "view with favor the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people ... "Though the letter further specified that "nothing shall be done which mat prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine,"the Jews assumed this clause was meaningless. The Balfour Declaration, as this letter came to be called, gave the Jews a foot in the Holy Land, and they set out with determination to wriggle the rest of their bulk through the door.
To direct this operation, Chaim Weismann went to Palestine in 1918, as head of the Zionist Commission . Under Weismann's supervision, armies of Jewish immigrants pushed into Palestine (made a British Mandate in 1922) till eventually they had swollen their numbers to one-half the total inhabitants. (their land-purchases were less prodigal; by 1948 they owned only 6 per cent of the available property.)
Through all this, the Church remained adamantly anti-Zionist. In a 1921 allocution, Pope Benedict XV expressed his fear that "the Jews should come to take in Palestine, a preponderant and privileged position."
World War I, as Nordau revealed, had beenthe scheduled means for setting up a Jewish state, but it did not quite do the trick. A second World War was needed to bring the Jews' otherwise unthinkable scheme to perfection.
At the conclusion of World War II, Chaim Weismann came to America to claim the spoils.
Spurred on by him and fellow Zionists, the United Nations obediently decreed that at the expiration of the British Mandate, the Holy Land should be partitioned into two areas, the smaller to be governed by Arabs, the larger by Jews.
The British were withdrawn on May 15, 1948. At midnight of May 14, Zionist leaders announced the formation of the Jewish State. Ten minutes after their announcement, President Harry Truman, defying all protocol, accorded this infant monstrosity official United States recognition. Later , Mr. Truman was to write in his published memoirs: "I do not think I ever had as much pressure and propaganda aimed at the White House as I had in this instance. The persistence of a few of the extreme Zionist leaders - actuated by political motives and engaging in political threats-disturbed me and annoyed me."
Even if it were not known otherwise, events of the last decade would bear stern witness that the Masonic M. Truman overcame his annoyance.
David Ben-Gurion
Though Chaim Weismann was duly named President of the Jewish State, and held that office until his death in 1952, it was a position of honor only.
The Jews were grateful for all Weismann had done, but they were confident they had come to a new season: the full flowering of that "Messianic Era" that Moses Hess had proclaimed, and now they had a new leader, their Prime Minister, David Ben-Gurion.
As effective head of the Jewish State, Ben-Gurion represents the fulfillment of Hess, Herzl, and Weismann, the achievement of Zionist victory. He is the symbol of Jewry on its own - the crucifixion of Christ free at last of Christian standards and surveillance. How alien the Jews are to those standards, their ten years of sovereignty have enabled them to show.
Jewish Terrorism Raises Its Ugly Head
The acts of Jewish terrorism that had marked the final months of the British Mandate (when Jews were blowing up British buildings in Palestine, hanging British soldiers, mailing time-bombs to members of the British cabinet) seemed like mere schoolboy pranks when the Jews went to work on the Arabs.
One million Arab residents of Palestine were forced to flee their ancestral homes - the orchards, pastures, and farms their people had worked for centuries.
As ex-Archbishop George Hakim of Galilee insisted: "They were terrorized out."
The persuasive device employed by the Jews was simple: They massacred one whole Arab village; then they sent a sound-truck through all the neighboring villages, promising each one the same fate unless the people evecuated their homes immediately.
All this was apart from the military aggresion, when Israeli soldiers, with arms supplied by Communist Czechoslavakia, invaded the Arab-assigned regions off Palestine and increased their national holdings by forty per cent.
Feats like this thrilled the Jews who watched from afar, swelled the fantastic sums being poured into Palestine by World Jewry, and provoked statements like this one by New York's Jewish congressman, Emmanuel Celler: "Maybe the Israelis may have to give the Arabs another lesson and cut through their forces again like a hot knife through butter. Only this time the pleas of the United Nations will not deter them They will shoot their way clear into Beirut, Amman, and Alexandria."
When Prime Minister ben-Gurion's plans for the further expansion of the Jewish State are realized (when international circumstances have been ordered to their end), there will be a fresh field open to the Jews, and it will be open not only for additional confiscation of Arab property, but for further desecration of Christian shrines and churches in those parts of the Holy Land that the Jews do not yet control.
Bethlehem, for example, can expect a repetition of the profanity and sacrilege that the Jews have already perpetrated in Mount Carmel, Ain-Karim, Haifa, Capharnaum, Tiberias, Beit-Jala, Katamon, in all of Galilee, and in Jerusalem, the Holy City itself. These previous desecrations, so well calculated by Mr. Ben-Gurion, prompted the well-known but little-heeded warning of the late Apostolate Delegate, Archbishop Hughes, who stated that there is in operation a "deliberate Jewish effort to decimate the Arabs and to destroy Christianity in Palestine."
The consequences of this "deliberate Jewish effort" will spread in our times far beyond the borders of Palestine. For the once-Christian West has betrayed Our Lord's Holy Land into the hands of His crucifiers, and already the price of the betrayal is being paid, in kind. It has cost England her empire. And it has put that other Zionist support, the United State of America, face to face with Third World War - one that looms like a terror out of the Apocalypse, and that will provide the most fantastic chapter yet in the unfinished story of Zionism.
[abridged from The Point, September, 1958, - edited under Fr. Leonard Feeney S.J.]
_______________
U.K. - Woman who posted Holocaust denial song on YouTube convicted
“A woman who wrote and performed
antisemitic songs mocking the Holocaust has been found guilty of posting
‘grossly offensive’ material to YouTube.
Alison Chabloz, 54, was convicted of three charges relating to three
of her songs at Westminster magistrates court on Friday. The district
judge, John Zani, said he was satisfied the material was grossly
offensive and that Chabloz intended to insult Jewish people…
The prosecution was initially brought privately by the charity , then taken over by the CPS.
The chair of the CAA, Gideon Falter, said: ‘Alison Chabloz has
dedicated herself over the course of years to inciting others to hate
Jews, principally by claiming that the Holocaust was a hoax perpetrated
by Jews to defraud the world. She is now a convicted criminal. This
verdict sends a strong message that in Britain Holocaust denial and
antisemitic conspiracy theories will not be tolerated.’…
Adrian Davies, defending, previously told Zani his ruling would be a
landmark one, setting a precedent on the exercise of free speech. He had
argued his client did not commit an offence, saying: ‘It is hard to
know what right has been infringed by Miss Chabloz’s singing.’
The singer has defended her work as ‘satire’, saying many Jewish
people found the songs funny. Lyrics included: ‘Did the Holocaust ever
happen? Was it just a bunch of lies? Seems that some intend to pull the
wool over our eyes.’
Chabloz, of Charlesworth, Derbyshire, was convicted of two counts of
causing an offensive, indecent or menacing message to be sent over a
public communications network.”
What a horrific scene.Those idolatrous women have marked
themselves as followers of the old serpent's lie, and even dispersed green smoke
into their midst.No, Bergoglio will
not condemn this, nor express any sorrow over it...
"God turned His blessing of the Jews to a curse." - The Point, Oct. 1958
____________________
"Doctor Earnest Hooton, Professor of anthropology at Harvard University, each year at his opening yearly lectures told his students, " I had best start by telling you about a conversation I had, a few years back with a sweet young thing from our sister institution.
This girl, approached me on the opening day and announced that she had signed up for my course. 'But I hope, Professor Hooton, ' she went on, 'I do hope that you're not going to tell me in your anthropology lectures that my soul evolved!'
Mustering what I imagined might sound like a father-confessor's most comforting tone, I reassured the red-faced young lady by saying, "Now, my child, don't you fret. I'm going to tell you that you have no soul at all!' " - The Point,
October, 1954
___________________
THE MONKEYS AND THE JEWS
Across the street from us, here at Saint Benedict Center, Harvard
University has settled down for another academic year. And for the first
time in many such years, Harvard’s faculty is minus one of its most
notorious members — that supreme potentate of anthropology, the late
Professor Earnest A. Hooton.
It was Dr. Hooton’s fashion, each year at this time, to open the
anthropology lectures with one of his stories. These varied little in
their slant, and the following, by virtue of repetition, was quite
likely his favorite.
With a suggestion of Oxford in his accent, Dr. Hooton would say, “I had
best start, perhaps, by telling you about a conversation I had, a few
years back, with a sweet young thing from our sister institution,
Radcliffe. This girl — an Irish girl, I believe — approached me on the
opening day of the semester and somewhat flusteredly announced that she
had signed up for my course. ‘But I do hope, Professor Hooton,’ she went
on, ‘I do hope that you’re not going to tell me in your anthropology
lectures that my soul evolved!’ Mustering what I imagined might sound
like a father-confessor’s most comforting tone, I reassured the
red-faced young lady by saying, ‘Now, now, my child, don’t you fret. I’m
going to tell you that you have no soul at all!’ ”
With the stage thus set, Earnest Hooton was launched on another season
of instructing young men and women that their remote grandfathers were
all soulless, simian tree-dwellers.
Who, you may well ask, is ultimately responsible for men like Hooton?
Who fosters them, builds them up, and encourages the public to listen
while they speak any absurdity and blasphemy that enters their heads? To
whose advantage is it that Christian society be so corrupted, Christian
values debunked? Whose policy is it that Christian men be made to
believe they are merely animals?
Back in February of 1936, the Catholic Gazetteof London, a
monthly published by England’s Catholic Missionary Society, printed an
article which contains a very conclusive answer to these questions,
particularly as they apply to Dr. Hooton. The article was entitled “The
Jewish Peril and the Catholic Church,” and it consisted of extracts from
speeches made as a convention in Paris of B’nai B’rith, the exclusively
Jewish branch of Freemasonry.
In one of these speeches an exultant Jew
went on record as saying: “We Jews have spread the spirit of revolt and
false liberalism among the nations of the gentiles so as to persuade
them away from their faith and even to make them ashamed of professing
the precepts of their religion and obeying the commandments of their
Church.
We have brought many of them to boast of being atheists, and
more than that, to glory in being descendants of the ape!”
Whether or not Earnest Hooton was a Jew (and there are arguments on
both sides) is irrelevant. The historical fact is that he well served
the cause of International Jewry in its effort to dupe the gentiles with
that basic tenet of Talmudic Judaism: “We are the human beings. The
gentiles are animals.”
As a fitting postscript to Dr. Hooton, right after his death one of the
principal Jewish hoaxes for establishing the authenticity of
anthropology, was exposed. At a meeting of the Geological Society in
London, it was announced that the famous “Piltdown Man,” for forty years
a foundation of anthropological theory, the hero of scores of
high-school “science” books, the trusted friend of hundreds of Hooton
disciples, was a complete fraud! The sham was explained in detail by the
director of the British Museum, who described how the skull had been
“doctored up and planted,” how the teeth had been artificially colored
with oil paint, and how the bone implements found with the Piltdown
remains had clearly been carved with a twentieth century kitchen knife.
_______________________
The Jewish Peril & The Catholic Church - from The Catholic Gazette, February, 1936
Editorial Note
That
there has been and still is a Jewish problem, no one can deny. Since the
rejection of Israel [or actually, the rejection of Esau] 1,900 years
ago, the Jews have scattered in every direction and in spite of
difficulties and even persecution, they have established themselves as a
power in nearly every nation of Europe. Jacobs, in his "Jewish
Contributions to Civilisation" glories in the fact that without
detriment to their own racial unity and international character, the
Jews have been able to spread their doctrines and increase their
political, social and economic influence among the nations.
In view
of this Jewish problem, which affects the Catholic Church in a special
way, we publish the following amazing extracts from a number of speeches
recently made under the auspices of a Jewish society in Paris. The name
of our informant must remain concealed. He is personally known to us
but by reason of his peculiar relations with the Jews at the present
time, we have agreed not to disclose his identity nor to give any
further details of the Paris meeting beyond the following extracts
which, though sometimes freely translated, nevertheless substantially
convey the meaning of the original statements.
* * * *
“As
long as there remains among the Gentiles any moral conception of the
social order, and until all faith, patriotism, and dignity are uprooted,
our reign over the world shall not come... ”
“We
have already fulfilled part of our work, but we cannot yet claim that the
whole of our work is done. We have still a long way to go before we can
overthrow our main opponent: the Catholic Church...”
“We
must always bear in mind that the Catholic Church is the only
institution which has stood, and which will, as long as it remains in
existence, stand in our way. The Catholic Church, with her methodical
work and her edifying and moral teachings, will always keep her children
in such a state of mind, as to make them too self-respecting to yield
to our domination, and to bow before our future King of Israel...”
“That
is why we have been striving to discover the best way of shaking the
Catholic Church to her very foundations. We have spread the spirit of
revolt and false liberalism among the nations of the Gentiles so as to
persuade them away from their faith and even to make them ashamed of
professing the precepts of their Religion and obeying the Commandments
of their Church. We have brought many of them to boast of being
atheists, and more than that, to glory in being descendants of the ape!
We have given them new theories, impossible of realisation, such as
Communism, Anarchism, and Socialism, which are now serving our
purpose... The stupid Gentiles have accepted them with the greatest
enthusiasm, without realising that those theories are ours, and that
they constitute our most powerful instrument against themselves...”
“We
have blackened the Catholic Church with the most ignominious calumnies,
we have stained her history and disgraced even her noblest activities.
We have imputed to her the wrongs of her enemies, and have thus brought
these latter to stand more closely by our side... So much so, that we
are now witnessing, to our greatest satisfaction, rebellions against the
Church in several countries... We have turned her Clergy into objects
of hatred and ridicule. we have subjected them to the contempt of the
crowd... We have caused the practice of the Catholic Religion to be
considered out of date and a mere waste of time...”
“And
the Gentiles, in their stupidity, have proved easier dupes than we
expected them to be. One would expect mere intelligence and more
practical common-sense, but they are no better than a herd of sheep. Let
them graze in our fields till they become fat enough to be worthy of
being immolated to our future King of the World...”
“We
have founded many secret associations, which all work for our purpose,
under our orders and our direction. We have made it an honour, a great
honour, for the Gentiles to join us in our organisations, which are,
thanks to our gold, flourishing now more than ever. Yet it remains our
secret that those Gentiles who betray their own and most precious
interests, by joining us in our plot, should never know that those
associations are of our creation, and that they serve our purpose...”
“One of
the many triumphs of our Freemasonry is that those Gentiles who become
members of our Lodges, should never suspect that we are using them to
build their own jails, upon whose terraces we shall erect the throne of
our Universal King of Israel; and should never know that we are
commanding them to forge the chains of their own servility to our future
King of the World.”
“So
far, we have considered our strategy in our attacks upon the Catholic
Church from the outside. But this is not all. Let us now explain how we
have gone further in our work, to hasten the ruin of the Catholic
Church, and how we have penetrated into her most intimate circles, and
brought even some of her Clergy to become pioneers of our cause.”
“Apart
altogether from the influence of our philosophy we have taken other steps
to secure a breach in the Catholic Church. Let me explain how this has
been done.”
“We
have induced some of our children to join the Catholic body, with the
explicit intimation that they should work in a still more efficient way
for the disintegration of the Catholic Church, by creating scandals
within her. We have thus followed the advice of our Prince of the Jews
who so wisely said: ‘Let some of your children become canons, so that
they may destroy the Church.’ Unfortunately, not all among the 'convert'
Jews have proved faithful to their mission. Many of them have even
betrayed us! But, on the other hand, others have kept their promise and
honoured their word. Thus the counsel of our Elders has proved
successful.”
“We are
the Fathers of all Revolutions – even of those which sometimes happen
to turn against us. We are the supreme Masters of Peace and War. We can
boast of being the Creators of the REFORMATlON!Calvin was one of our
Children: he was of Jewish descent, and was entrusted by Jewish
authority and encouraged with Jewish finance to draft his scheme in the
Reformation.”
“Martin
Luther yielded to the influence of his Jewish friends, and again, by
Jewish authority and with Jewish finance, his plot against the Catholic
Church met with Success...”
“Thanks
to our propaganda, to our theories of Liberalism and to our
misrepresentations of Freedom, the minds of many among the Gentiles were
ready to welcome the Reformation. They separated from the Church to
fall into our snare. And thus the Catholic Church has been very sensibly
weakened and her authority over the Kings of the Gentiles has been
reduced almost to naught...”
“We are
grateful to Protestants for their loyalty to our wishes – although most
of them are, in the sincerity of their faith, unaware of their loyalty
to us. We are grateful to them for the wonderful help they are giving us
in our fight against the stronghold of Christian Civilisation, and in
our preparations for the advent of our supremacy over the whole world
and over the Kingdoms of the Gentiles.”
“So far
we have succeeded in overthrowing most of the Thrones of Europe. The
rest will follow in the near future. Russia has already worshipped our
rule. France, with her Masonic Government, is under our thumb. England,
in her dependence upon our finance, is under our heel; and in her
Protestantism is our hope for the destruction of the Catholic Church.
Spain and Mexico are but toys in our hands. And many other countries,
including the U.S.A., have already fallen before our scheming.”
“But the Catholic Church is still alive...”
“We
must destroy her without the least delay and without the slightest
mercy. Most of the Press in the world is under our Control; let us
therefore encourage in a still more violent way the hatred of the world
against the Catholic Church. Let us intensify our activities in
poisoning the morality of the Gentiles. Let us spread the spirit of
revolution in the minds of the people. They must be made to despise
Patriotism and the love of their family, to consider their faith as a
humbug, their obedience to their Church as a degrading servility, so
that they may become deaf to the appeal of the Church and blind to her
warnings against us. Let us, above all, make it impossible for
Christians outside the Catholic Church to be reunited with that Church,
or for non-Christians to join that Church; otherwise the greatest
obstruction to our domination will be strengthened and all our work
undone. Our plot will be unveiled, the Gentiles will turn against us, in
the spirit of revenge, and our domination over them will never be
realised.”
“Let us
remember that as long as there still remain active enemies of the
Catholic Church, we may hope to become Masters of the World... And let
us remember always that the future Jewish King will never reign in the
world before the Pope in Rome is dethroned, as well as all the other
reigning Monarchs of the Gentiles upon earth.”
* * * * *
THE SECRET HOLOCAUST
By Eustace Mullins
The devastation of
civilization to date by the rapacious hordes of Godless Communism, as
well as their planned annihilation of all non-Jewish societies and
political organizations, began to ravage the world in the nineteenth
century. It has resulted in incredible suffering and death for many
millions of Christian victims in many parts of the world. Yet these
Christian victims lie in their graves, unmourned and unknown, while a
new class of international citizens, the creators of Marxist terrorism,
profess to be the only "victims" who have endured suffering in the past
one hundred and fifty years. They command the world to weep for them,
because they control the world.
These harbingers of terror
claim to be "refugees", since they had no nation of their own, but
infested the civilized societies in every part of the world for two
thousand years, bringing with them, in every instance, disease and
death. They have emerged from one shattered nation after another, not
as refugees, but as the final victors, bearing away their loot, and
scurrying through parts which they have created and which they alone
know how to follow, until they come to another host nation. With them
they bring, like the medieval Bubonic Plagues, (an infection which they
were accused of spreading), a terrible contamination, an infestation
which quickly spreads through the new host country, and fells all who
become its victims. This plague is world Communism, and its known
carriers, the furry scavengers who have found their way through the
sewers into every civilized place, are the international Jews.
We are asked to weep only
for the Jews, and to ignore the many millions of actual victims of world
terrorism in the past one hundred and fifty years, a chronicle of such
horror that one scarcely can bear to put down this bloodstained record,
not merely in fear that the world might put away its business in order
to mourn these countless victims of international Communist terrorism,
but that the tragic fate of these innocents, most of them women and
children, is one of such pathos that one's heart could break from the
full impact of its terrifying implications for everyone alive today.
One of the first victims of
the international financiers, shortly after publication of the
Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx in 1848, was the Southern civilization
of the United States. White immigrants had wrested from a hostile
territory the means to create a gracious culture, one which the ruder
and more unlettered sections of the new Republic could only gape at in
admiration, an admiration, however, which soon turned to envy and then
hatred. This hatred brought armies into the American South, bearing the
terrorists who, unknown at that time, were the first Communist
totalitarians determined to wreak their hatred and policies of
annihilation on all civilized people. The Southerners were unfortunate
enough to be the first victims. Military governments were set up in the
conquered South, operating solely on the totalitarian concepts of
Godless Communism, with courts functioning under martial law. The
Southerners had been robbed of their Constitution, and of their rights
to property and even to existence. Their homes were burned and looted,
and savage hordes were unleashed to rape and pillage the properties
which were occupied only by women and children. To deny the inherited
rights of these Southerners, which were still their due under the laws
of this nation, a brutal reign of terror, featuring Federal Judges,
Federal Courts, and Federal Prisons, which were set up for the first
time in any state of these United States. For those Southern patriots
who dared to protest these outrages, Federal insane asylums were set up
for those who were not executed on the spot.
From New York, Jewish
carpetbaggers, the Lehmans, the Baruchs, and other special emissaries of
the Rothschilds, came to seize from the widows and orphans of the
Confederate dead their last savings, their last possessions, and their
devastated lands. The "Federal" power was absolute, for the military
Reconstruction of the South was an occupation zone, and no democratic
procedures were allowed the vanquished Southerners until they had been
stripped of their last holdings. The impoverished survivors were forced
to make a living by whatever pitiful means left to them.
In Europe, too, the
civilized nations were beset throughout the nineteenth century by
successive wars and revolutions, which resulted in millions of Christian
refugees. Modern history begins with the Congress of Vienna in 1815,
when the Jews, unleashed
from their ghettoes and bearing a tide of gold amassed by the
Rothschilds through their instigation and financing of wars from 1775 to
1812, used their newly acquired wealth to subvert the established
governments of Europe and to start them on their terrifying slide into
oblivion. Their victims were helpless before their Jewish onslaught
because they were Christians who believed that love for one's fellow man
guides the affairs of the earth. And so it does, until Satan
intervenes through his people. It was impossible for any Christian to
believe that such bloodthirsty savages could exist among any civilized
people. Nor could the Christians, believing in their religion of
Christ's love for humanity, understand the virulent hatred which the Jew
bore towards all of God's creatures and which is beyond the ken of any
civilized human being.
[please bear in mind that
above mentioned Congress of Vienna was made possible by the house of
Romanov and that german nobility of Russia which Mr. Mullins presently
tells were such blessing to Russia, and mankind in general]
Only now, as the Christian
peoples totter on the verge of worldwide annihilation by the Jewish
master scheme, can some indication of the nature of the enemy begin to
be seen. In the New Republic, April 13, 1983, it is noted that
a Polish agitator, Adam Michnik, is accused of being a Zionist who is
"prepared to torture patriotic opponents". In the same issue, we find
that Jerry Urban wrote in a Polish journal that "the bloodthirstiness of
Zionist doctrine and practice" must be opposed. Urban calls attention
to "genocide in its Israeli edition", referring to the continued
massacres of Arab women and children under the direction of fanatical
Zionists in the notorious Rosh Hasahan Massacre, a religious celebration
which served the dual purpose of Jewish ritual murder and the political
goals of the world's most famous terrorist, Prime Minister Menachem
Begin, who desires to murder every Arab man, woman and child in the
territories which the Jews plan to annex and settle in the Middle East.
Urban brings up a vital
point in referring to the well known genocidal practices of the Israeli
Government, suggesting that the Jews are now delighting in mass murder
as a compensation for the myth that they quietly went to their "deaths"
in the notorious "Holocaust" fantasy without resisting their Nazi
"killers". The idea that the heretofore "passive" Jews are, for the
first time in their history, learning to kill, belies the entire
recorded history of this plague. There are too many well-documented
massacres in history in which the Jews tortured and murdered their
victims with the greatest glee, gloating in such barbaric practices of
tearing out the hearts of women and children and smearing the blood on
their faces, while the Jewish women ripped out the writhing entrails of
their dying victims, wrapped the steaming evidences of their victory
around their waists, and began the traditional Jewish dance of the
Hatikvah as the celebration of their triumph over their vanquished foes.
The Book of Esther records
one of many such massacres of their victims by the Jews. ESTHER
VIII:11: "Wherein the King granted the Jews which were in every city to
gather themselves together, and to stand for their life, to destroy, to
slay, and to cause to perish, all the power of the people and province
that would assault them, both little ones and women, and to take the
spoil of them for their prey."
Thus a Jewish prostitute
employed her power over the King to demand that he allow the Jews to
massacre "both little ones and children", not merely in one town, but
throughout the Kingdom, because "the Jews which were in every city",
just as they are today. This Biblical story records the first instance
of total war, in which women and children were to be slain, as opposed
to the traditional military combat, in which professional soldiers,
trained for this role, met on the battlefield to vie against each other,
and to win or lose honorably in the field. The Jews, as their million
dollar a week apologists, Pat Robertson and Reverend Jerry Falwell, go
to great pains to explain to us, did not have to fight on the
battlefield to win territory, because God had promised them the Earth,
and this "Sacred Promise" is the only law in the world today. It is to
be hoped that at some point Falwell and Robertson will show us the
actual documents on which this historic deed was recorded. To date,
they ignore all questions about any proof of their fantastic claims on
behalf of the Jews, and the millions keep rolling in. Despite the
flagrant efforts of Falwell and Robertson on behalf of the Jewish world
murder plan, the record shows that the Jew prefers to avoid the
battlefield and the hazards of face to face combat, and to stealthily
set up the massacres of helpless women and children. Such has been
their history, and today, we have even seen it live on color television.
It was the ingrained
bloodthirstiness of the Jews which led them to select as their principal
"religious" holiday, the Feast of Purim, which celebrates their
massacre of the innocents. ESTHER VIII:17. "And in every province and
in every city, whithersoever the King's commandment and his decree came,
the Jews had joy and gladness, a feast and a good day. And many of the
people of the land became Jews; for the fear of the Jews fell upon
them."
"Have A Good Day!"
One of the most striking
parts of this wellknown quotation from the Book of Esther, the only
genuinely Jewish book of the Bible, and, for that reason, the only one
in which God is not mentioned, is the revelation that the code word of
the Jews to indicate their knowledge of the Jewish World Murder Plan, is
their remembrance of their massacre of the innocents by their code
phrase, "had a good day". Since that massacre, Jews have always offered
this recognition phrase to each other, in Yiddish or in whatever
language of the particular nation which they planned to take over, by
saying, "Have a good day", meaning, of course, "We're looking forward to
more massacres of the women and children of the goyim, or the gentile
cattle."
Now that the Jews have
attained such enormous economic and political power in the United
States, they have instructed all of their gentile employees in the vast
networks of retail grocery, drug and apparel stores which they own
throughout the United States that they must greet each customer by
saying, "Have a good day." This apparently friendly and supposedly
meaningless salutation lets the Jew in the know be tipped off that he is
in a store owned by Jews, and that the owners are anticipating "having a
good day" in the future by more slaughters of the innocent and helpless
gentile women and children.
The most important
statement in the Book of Esther is the warning that "the fear of the
Jews fell upon them." Today, the dark shadow of imminent tragedy looms
over every Christian, because of their fear of the Jews, and because of
their instinctive knowledge, like penned cattle in a slaughterhouse,
that the Jew intends to kill them for his profit. Jacob Timerman, in an
enlightening series of articles in the New Yorker magazine in
1982, said, "To understand the existence of the Other and then admit his
existence without hatred is something new for Israel as a whole." The
Other, of course, means the non-Jew, a person whom the Jew cannot see
without hatred. Because of his savage nature, the Jew wishes only to
kill him and drink his blood. It is this terrible desire which bars the
Jew from peaceful existence in any civilized nation, and which has been
solely responsible for the occasional but ineffective resistance which
the intended Christian victims have offered in opposition to his murder
plans.
The Jew has only one
purpose in the Middle East, and that is to murder all of the Arab
inhabitants and to take their lands. The great scholar. Dr. Eric
Bischoff, discovered this revelation in the official Jewish text of the
Thikune Zohar, Edition Berdiwetsch, 88b, a book which, like all Jewish
"religious" texts, is actually a code of cabalistic rituals detailing
the instructions on how to murder the gentiles.
"Furthermore," says the
Thikune Zohar, "there is a commandment pertaining to the killing of
strangers, who are like beasts. This killing has to be done in the
lawful Jewish method. Those who do not bid themselves to the Jewish
religious law must be offered up as sacrifices to the High God."
From the historian's point
of view, the Jewish world war against all Christians proceeds in an
unbroken succession of events from ancient history, when Jewish
prostitutes such as Esther persuaded rulers to destroy their own people
at the whim of the Jews. In 1773, Mayer Anselm Rothschild met with
twelve leading Jews to plot the downfall of the emerging Christian
nations in both the New World and the Old World. During the American
struggle for independence, Rothschild founded his fortune on the money
received by the Elector of Hesse in payment for the mercenaries whom he
rented to the British in their attempt to crush the American colonists.
The War of 1812 was
instigated by the Rothschilds to force the renewal of their charter for
the Bank of the United States. When this charter was vetoed by
President Andrew Jackson in 1836, the Jews precipitated a financial
panic and set up their plan to bring about the Civil War, which would
simultaneously destroy the American Republic and despoil the wealthy
Christian families of the South. The Communist Manifesto of 1848 set
Europe ablaze with revolutions, wars and counter-revolutions.
In August 1903, Max Nordau,
in his address to the 6th Zionist Congress in Balse, Switzerland,
revealed the plan for even greater conflagrations, the coming world
wars:
"Let me tell you the
following words as if I were showing you the rungs of a ladder leading
upward and upward ... The Zionist Congress; the English Uganda
proposition; the future World War; the Peace Conference where, with the
help of England, a free and Jewish Palestine will be created."
Onward and upward, over the
bodies of fifty million more dead Christians this was Max Nordau's
ecstatic vision of the coming World War, and so it came to pass.
Professional historians have never been able to offer a satisfactory
explanation of how the European nations became embroiled in the First
World War. Arch-duke Ferdinand was assassinated by Gavril Princeps at
Sarajevo; Austria demanded an apology from Serbia, Serbia apologized but
Austria inexplicably declared war anyway. Three Jewish advisers to
Kaiser Wilhelm, Chancellor Bethmann-Hollweg, Max Warburg and Albert
Ballin, then had the Kaiser declare war, and the other nations were
involved. Why ? To carry out the Jewish Plan.
On February 8, 1920, Sir Winston Churchill expressed his alarm over world developments in an interview published in the Sunday Illustrated Herald,
London: "From the days of Adam (Spartacus) Weishaupt, to those of Karl
Marx to those of Trotsky, Bela Kun, Rosa Luxemburg and Emma Goldman.
This worldwide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the
reconstruction of society on the basis of arrested development, of
envious malevolence and impossible equality, has been steadily growing
... There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of
Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by
these international, and for the most part, atheistic Jews. It is
certainly a very great one: it probably outweighs all others. With the
notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are
Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from
the Jewish leaders."
Churchill referred, of
course, to the overthrow of the Christian Orthodox Church in Russia and
its replacement by a hateful gang of homicidal maniacs, whose
unimaginable success was accomplished by the astute financial aid of
Jacob Schiff to the Jewish revolutionaries, and by Max Warburg in
Germany, who, at the crucial moment of the revolution in Russia,
arranged for Lenin to be transported through Germany to Russia in a
sealed train to lead the conspirators to their Bolshevik triumph.
[Sea Lord Churchill was
only too happy to perform a large scale blood-sacrifice at Galipoli,
using british soldiers as offering, so there is enough to worry about on
his own plate ... had England not fomented and started that war there
would have been no reason for the German High Command to revolutionize
and send Lenin and financing to Russia]
The orgy of murder, torture
and pillage which followed the Jewish triumph in Russia has never been
equalled in the history of the world. For more than a thousand years,
the White Russians, descendants of German settlers in Russia, had
provided an economic climate in which Russia, the "breadbasket of
Europe", had prospered. In a few days, this stable civilization
vanished, perhaps never to return. The fortunate ones were those who
recognized the peril in time to flee with nothing but the clothes on
their backs. Those who dallied or sought to save others were shot down
in mass executions persisting through the night, the constant rattle of
machine guns muffled by the roar of truck engines raced at full throttle
to drown the sound of the shots and the screams of the dying.
[had you experienced the
high standard of living in feudal Russia, perhaps, you would have a
different opinion of this alleged prosperity]
On March 13, 1917, Jacob
Schiff sent Milyukov, new Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Bolshevik
Revolutionary Government, and a personal friend of Schiff, a telegram
reproduced in the New York Times, April 10, 1917: "Allow me, as
the irreconcilable enemy of the tyrannical autocratic government which
pitilessly persecuted our co-religionaires, to congratulate through your
intermission the Russian people for what they have so brilliantly
accomplished, and to wish success to your comrades in government and to
yourself." The issue also reproduces Milyukov's enthusiastic reply, "We
are one with you in our hatred and antipathy for the old regime which
is overthrown."
[idiot ! the czar only
abdicated on March 15, the bolsheviks did not come to power until
November, and Milyukov had no part in their government, but was running
fast as he could]
The key word here is
"hatred". The Jews were free to indulge their most fervent fantasies of
mass murder of helpless victims. Christians were dragged from their
beds, tortured and killed. Some were actually sliced to pieces, bit by
bit, while others were branded with hot irons, their eyes poked out to
induce unbearable pain. Others were placed in boxes with only their
heads, hands and legs sticking out. Then hungry rats were placed in the
boxes to gnaw upon their bodies. Some were nailed to the ceiling by
their fingers or by their feet, and left hanging until they died of
exhaustion. Others were chained to the floor and hot lead poured into
their mouths. Many were tied to horses and dragged through the streets
of the city, while the mob attacked them with rocks and kicked them to
death.
Mothers were taken to the
public square and their babies snatched from their arms. A Red
terrorist would take a baby, hold it by the head, head downward, and
demand that the Christian mother deny Christ. If she would not, he
tossed the baby into the air, while another member of the mob rushed
forward to catch it on the tip of his bayonet. Pregnant Christian women
were chained to trees and their babies cut out of their bodies. There
were many places of public execution in Russia during the days of the
Revolution one of which was described by the American Rohrbach
Commission, (Defender Magazine, October, 1933):
"The whole cement floor of
the execution hall of the Jewish Cheka of Kiev was flooded with blood;
it formed a level of several inches. It was a horrible mixture of
blood, brains and pieces of skull. All the walls was besmattered with
blood. Pieces of brains and of scalps were sticking to them. A gutter
of 25 centimeters wide by 25 centimeters deep and about 10 meters long
was along its length full to the top with blood. Some bodies were
disemboweled, others had limbs chopped off, some were literally hacked
to pieces. Some had their eyes put out the head, face and neck and
trunk were covered with deep wounds. Further on, we found a corpse with
a wedge driven into its chest. Some had no tongues. In a corner we
discovered a quantity of dismembered arms and legs belonging to no
bodies that we could locate."
We already know of the glee
with which Jacob Schiff and other Jewish bankers greeted the news that
their co-religionaires in Russia were now engaged in the favorite Jewish
practice of mass murder, but what of American government officials, who
were well-informed by a number of intelligence sources about these
atrocities ? We have at least one record of a public response by a
prominent government official, Woodrow Wilson, President of the United
States. On April 2, 1917, Wilson, after learning of these atrocities,
went before the Congress of the United States and said, "The autocracy
that crowned the summit of her (Russia's) political structure, long as
it had stood and terrible as was the reality of its power, was not in
fact Russian in origin, character or purpose; and now it has been
shaken off and the great generous Russian people have been added in all
their naive majesty and might to the forces that are fighting for
freedom in the world for justice, and for peace. Here is a fit partner
for a League of Honor."
[what atrocities in March of 1917 ?]
Wilson's goofy reference to
the "non-Russian" nature of the Czar's government referred to the fact
that the Czars were descendants of Germans who had settled in Russia one
thousand years earlier. The oldest dynasty in Europe, the Russian
aristocracy, was denounced by the Communist propagandist Wilson as being
"non-Russian ! One wonders how Wilson would have described his own
origins, a President of the United States whose family had been in the
United States less than a hundred years, and whose racial and
geographical origins remain a matter of considerable speculation.
Wilson apparently believed
that the thousand years the Romanvs had lived in Russia did not qualify
them. for Russian citizenship, but they were replaced by Communists who
not only were Russians, but who belonged to no nation of this earth.
The Overman Committee in 1919 published a report of its findings which
are pertinent to this subject. Titled, "Bolshevik Propaganda Hearing
Before the Sub-Committee of the Committee on the Judiciary, United
States Senate, 65th Congress," it records the testimony of Dr. George A.
Simons, former superintendent of the Methodist Missions in Russia, from
which we briefly quote:
"We were told that hundreds of agitators
had followed in the trail of Trotsky-Bronstein, these men having come
over from the lower east side of New York. Some of them when they
learned that I was the American pastor in Petrograd, stepped up to me
and seemed very much pleased that there was somebody who could speak
English, and their broken English showed that they had not qualified as
being real Americans. A number of these men called on me and were
impressed with the strange Yiddish element in this thing right from the
beginning, and it soon became evident that more than half the agitators
in the so-called Bolshevik movement were Jews ... I have a firm
conviction that this thing is Yiddish, and that one of its bases is
found in the east side of New York ... The latest startling information,
given me by someone with good authority, is this, that in December,
1918, in the northern community of Petrograd -- that is what they call
the section of the Soviet regime under the Presidency of the man known
as Apfelbaum (Zinoviev) -- out of 388 members, only 16 happened to be
real Russians, with the exception of one man, a negro from America who
calls himself Professor Gordon.
"I was impressed with this, Senator, that shortly
after the great revolution of the winter of 1917 there were scores of
Jews standing on the benches and soap boxes, talking until their mouths
frothed, and I often remarked to my sister, 'Well, what are we coming to
anyway. This all looks so Yiddish.' Up to that time we had very few
Jews, because there was, as you know, a restriction against having Jews
in Petrograd, but after the revolution they swarmed in there and most of
the agitators were Jews.
"I might mention this, that when the Bolshevik came
into power, all over Petrograd, we at once had a predominance of Yiddish
proclamations, big posters and everything in Yiddish. It became very
evident that now that was to be one of the great languages of Russia;
and the real Russians did not take kindly to it."
A widely known French
journal, "L'Illustration", of September 14, 1918, commented, "When one
lives in contact with the functionaries who are serving the Bolshevik
Government, one feature strikes the attention, which, is almost all of
them are Jews. I am not at all anti-Semitic; but I must state what
strikes the eye: everywhere in Petrograd, in Moscow, in provincial
districts, in commissariats, in district offices, in Smolny, in the
Soviets, I have met nothing but Jews and again Jews ... The more one
studies the revolution the more one is convinced that Bolshevism is a
Jewish movement which can be explained by the special conditions in
which the Jewish people were placed in Russia."
The Overman Report explains
why Woodrow Wilson was so happy that the "non-Russian" Romanovs,
intruders who had only lived in Russia for one thousand years, had been
replaced by violent overthrow of their government by Yiddish speaking
Jews from the lower East Side of New York, but who, being Wilson's own
kind, were now to be hailed by the government of the United States as
mass murderers who were "a fit partner for a League of Honor."
One can only conjecture
whether Wilson, who was never examined for mental problems despite his
many erratic actions culminating in his final breakdown, did not long to
be there with his co-religionaires, a League of Honor which pleasured
itself by ripping babies out of their mothers' wombs, walking knee deep
in the blood of their victims, ripping out an eye here, a tongue there,
hacking off a leg or an arm, in short, trying to be impartial in dealing
out Jewish "justice" to the "non-Russian autocrats" whose only fault
was that they had been too stupid and too easy-going to protect their
homes and families against the invasions by the Jewish terrorist until
it was too late. Alexander Solzhenitsyn relates that some sixty-six
million "real Russians" have been murdered since the Bolshevik
Revolution at the hands of the Yiddish revolutionaries, and now two
hundred million citizens of the United States await their turn in the
abattoirs of the bloodthirsty Zionist terrorists.
Rev. Denis Fahey, in his
book, "The Rulers of Russia", exposed the real names of many of the
Jewish terrorists who operated the Soviet murder machine in Russia.
Trotsky was Bronstein, Martov was Zederbaum, Zinoviev was Apfelbaum,
Kamenev was Rosenfeld, Parvus was Helphand, Bohrin was Nathanson, and so
on.
Many of the White Russians
fled towards the Pacific, from Vladivostock to the Port of Dairen. The
Russian women, who had presided over the most gracious palaces known to
European civilization, were forced to turn to prostitution to find bread
for their starving children; others, finding the degradation
unbearable, committed suicide or slowly starved to death. Decades after
the Russian Revolution, some of the White Russian women could still be
found in houses of prostitution in Shanghai, Peking and Tokyo.
The male survivors of the
Marxist Terror, many of them highly cultured scholars, philosophers and
scientists, found no means of support from their highly specialized
talents in the harsh Asiatic world of the refugee. One Russian General
was seen pulling a rickshaw as a coolie in Shanghai for a few days; he
later hung himself in his barren room. Those who survived the initial
Terror in Russia were fated for an even harsher death, a slow agonizing
one as a prisoner in a Jewish operated concentration camp.
For many years the Jews,
through their total control of the media in Christian nations, prevented
any word of the horrors which they daily perpetrated on Christians in
Soviet Russia from reaching the outside world. Finally one victim, who
had survived a sentence in a concentration camp, Alexander Solzhenitsyn,
reached safety. In his book, "The Gulag Archipelago", he informed an
incredulous world that the blood-maddened Jewish terrorists had murdered
sixty-six million victims in Russia from 1918 to 1957 !
Solzhenitsyn cited Cheka
Order No. 10, issued on Jan. 8, 1921: "To intensify the repression of
the bourgeoisie." It was this order on which the establishment of the
terrible Siberian camps, Kolyman and many others, was based.
Solzhenitsyn also brought to the Christian world the names of the mass
murderers who ran these camps. All of them were Jews. Typical was one
Lazar Kogan, who watched thousands of slave laborers die during his
stint as boss of the White Sea Canal construction. He would sometimes
remark to a new prisoner, "I believe that you personally were not guilty
of anything. But, as an educated person, you have to understand that
social prophylaxtis was being widely applied."
"Social prophylaxis" was
one of the vicious Jewish phrases which they used as euphemisms for
their massacre of the Christians. Their victims, once they were
consigned to the camps, were no longer considered human, as the Jews
considered all others to be non-human. They were known simply by the
nickname of "zeks", slang for "zakluchenny", which means "prisoner" in
Russian.
The Jews were given another
opportunity to massacre helpless Christians during the Spanish Civil
War. Ernest Elmhurst states in "World Hoax", p. 157, "Of no less
significance was the transfer of Soviet Russia's former peace delegate
at Geneva -- the Jew Rosenberg (Moses Israelsohn) with his staff of 140
members to the office of Ambassador to Spain in August of 1936."
This cadre of highly
trained specialists in torture and murder passed over a reign of terror
which was largely ignored by the rest of the world, because the
journalists covering the Spanish War, Ernest Hemingway and many others,
were themselves sympathetic to the Communists and they sought only to
discredit the Spanish patriots, the "Fascists" as they contemptuously
termed them.
The Rosenberg murder teams
were called "World Revolutionary Movement Purification Squads." Their
"purification" consisted mainly of massacres of priests, nuns, choirboys
and women and children as is so well described in the Book of Esther
and the occasion of the Jewish celebration of the Feast of Purim.
Arthur Bryant, in his well-documented "Communist Atrocities in Spain",
tells of one murder squad which went to the Dominician Convent in
Barcelona and informed the Mother Superior that "because of possible mob
violence" the nuns should accompany the squad to a place of safety.
They were then taken to the suburbs and murdered. Their Jewish leader
commented, "We needed the building. We didn't want to muss it up before
we occupied it." E.M. Godden, in "Conflict in Spain," says on p. 72,
"During the last week of July, 1936, the bodies of nuns were exhumed
from their graves and propped up outside the walls of their convents.
Obscene and offensive placards were attached to their bodies." In
Madrid, it was estimated that one tenth of the population of Spain was
murdered by the Communist Jews by 1939. De Fonteriz in "Red Terror in
Madrid", tells how Cheka crews organized by Dimitrov and Rosenberg
carried out a program of torture and murder so obscene that it cannot be
repeated or described.
To further their World
Murder Plan, the Jews have occasionally allowed a few of their numbers
to be sacrificed. This was brought out at the meeting in Rothschild's
home in 1773, when it was stated, "But it has paid us even though we
have sacrificed many of our own people. Each victim on our side is
worth a thousand Goyim." What the speaker meant was that if one Jew
happens to be killed, he will be avenged by the death of one thousand
Christians, or "cattle" as the Christians are derisively referred to by
the Jewish cult. The speaker went on to point out to his rapt listeners
that "We are interested in just the opposite ... in the diminution, the
killing out of the Goyim."
[and the record of this meeting in Rothschild's house survived how ?]
Certainly no murder plan
had ever previously been so meticulously laid out or so precisely put
into operation. The figures are in, and they are indisputable; fifty
million victims in World War I; a hundred and fifty million victims in
World War II; sixty-six million Christians murdered by Jewish fanatics
in Russia since the success of the Bolshevik Revolution. Many, if not
the majority, of these victims of Jewish terrorism were women and
children. Millions of them perished of starvation and exposure in
campaigns of Communist expulsion from their homes.
Typical was the expulsion
of the Sudeten Germans from Czechoslovakia after World War II, during
which more than one million Germans died, and the expulsion of the
Germans from Poland, a horrifying trek which cost the lives of two
million Germans.
The Jews especially
delighted in the deaths of these millions of Christian refugees, since
the manner of their death fulfilled the most cherished doctrine of the
Jewish hatred of all Christians -- that non-Jews, being considered as
non-humans or cattle, in the Jewish term "Goyim", are not to be buried.
This is a violation of Jewish law, which prohibits "animals" from being
buried. These millions of Christian refugees lay where they fell
during there terrible Communist expulsions, and never received Christian
burial.
Early in World War II, the
Communist delighted in the opportunity to indulge in their favorite
sport of mass murder. During the first days of the war, 15,000 Polish
officers, who were the flower of the nation, were captured. They were
taken to three Jewish operated Communist camps, Starobiesk, Kozielsk,
and Ostashkov. Only 448 were ever seen alive again. The rest vanished,
but not without trace. The Kozielsk camp was situated in the grounds
of a former Orthodox monastery, five miles from the Kozielsk railway
station in this camp, about 5000, were sent away in small groups, the
process continuing until April, 1940. Parfeon Kisselev said that in the
spring of 1940 prisoners were brought to Katyn Forest in three or four
buses daily. >From his house he heard shots and shouts. It was
rumored that 10,000 Poles were shot there. When the German Army
occupied the area in 1943 an investigation was begun. The Final Report
of the German Police dated June 10, 1943, states that, "It was proved
that, without exception, death was caused by a shot in the back of the
neck. The seven mass graves of murdered Polish officers which have been
cleared, cover a relatively small area. >From the translation of
diaries, of memoirs and other notes found with the bodies, it was proved
that the officers who had been taken prisoner by the Soviet Army in
1939 were sent to various camps: Kozielsk, Starobielsk, Ostashkov,
Putiviel, Bolotov, Pavlishcev Bor, Shepyetovka, Gorodok. The majority
of those killed in Katyn Forest had been in the Kozielski camp.
>From the end of March, until the first day of May, 1940, the
prisoners from Kozielsk arrived by rail. The exact dates cannot be
established. A few short intervals apart, a batch left almost every
day; the number of prisoners varied between 100 and 300 persons ...
Thence, in the early morning, the prisoners proceeded in special lorries
to the Katyn Forest. There the officers were immediately shot, thrown
into the waiting graves and buried, as may be seen from the evidence of
witness Kisselev, who has seen the ditches being prepared. That the
shooting took place immediately after the arrival of a batch of
prisoners is proved by witnesses who heard shots after every such
arrival. There was no accommodation in the forest apart with the rest
house, which has a limited capacity. From the position of the bodies it
may be assumed that the majority were murdered outside the graves.
Very many of the dead men had their hands tied behind their backs. The
evidence of witnesses confirms that access to the forest was forbidden.
Voss, Secretary of the Field Police."
Professor Butz's Report
stated, "Documents found on the victims (identity cards -- but not
military passports -- diaries, letters, postcards, calendars,
photographs, drawings, etc. gave the names, age, profession, origin and
family relations of the victims. Pathetic entries in the diaries
testify to the treatment of the victims by the NKVD. Letters and
postcards from relatives in Upper Silesia, in the 'General Government'
and in the Russian-occupied zone, written, to judge the post office
stamps, between Autumn, 1939, and March or April, 1940, clearly point to
the time of the crime (spring, 1940)."
The Katyn Case came before
the Nuremberg tribunal as part of the general trial of German "war
criminals", the Soviets having claimed this atrocity had been committed
by the Germans. Although it was on the agenda, the Soviets omitted it
from the judgement, nor was any Pole allowed to testify about it. Mr.
G.F. Hudson wrote in the quarterly, "International Affairs", "the
unquiet dead of Katyn still walk the earth." In subsequent years, a
number of Congressmen have sought to reopen the case, including Hon.
George A. Dondero, Hon. Ray Madden and others. A U.S. Congressional
Select Committee, 2 July 1952, reported that "The committee unanimously
agrees that evidence dealing with the first phase of its investigation
proves conclusively and irrevocably that the Soviet NKVD (People's
Commissariat of Internal Affairs) committed the massacre of Polish Army
officers in the Katyn Forest near Smolensk, Russia, not later than the
spring of 1940. The committee further concludes that the Soviets had
plotted this criminal extermination of Poland's intellectual leadership
as early as the fall of 1939 -- shortly after Russia's treacherous
invasion of the Polish nation's borders. There can be no doubt that
this massacre was a calculated plot to eliminate all Polish leaders who
subsequently would have opposed the Soviets' plan for communizing
Poland."
The end of World War II
gave the Communists the opportunity to wreak revenge on all who had
opposed them during the war. As a result, from two to five million
victims were massacred by Jewish terrorists in France, Italy,
Czechoslovakia, and other countries in which the Communists were allowed
by their Allies to murder at will all anti-Communists or "Fascists".
The Sunday Oklahoman shed some light on this horror, Jan. 21,
1973, "Document tells Allied Part in Deaths of Thousands": "A former
White House consultant has provided the Sunday Oklahoman with a
secret document exposing for the first time what appears to be Allied
complicity in the deaths of thousands of unsuspecting, liberated
prisoners of war and displaced persons after World War II. The
document, a 10-page British Army report, is believed to be part of
voluminous Anglo-American files on the forcible repatriation to the
Soviet Union of an estimated 2 to 5 million unwilling anti-Communists
between 1944 and 1948. The files, codenamed Operation Keelhaul, are
still kept under tight security in London and Washington as virtually
the last major secret of World War II. The secret British report
summarizes one repatriation operation in Italy in which Russian POWs and
DIs were turned over to the Red Army and almost certain execution after
being duped by the British into believing they would be given asylum in
the West. It tells of the agony and the horror experienced by the
prisoners." The leading criminal in this mass execution of two to five
million anticommunists was -- who else -- our grinning Ike, head of the
European sector for the Allied armies, or, as you may know him, our
former President, Eisenhower. The crime of Operation Keelhaul was not
on the agenda at Nuremberg.
To finance the State of
Israel which was created as a direct result of the Jewish victory over
the Christian nations in World War II, Jews, who had committed all the
atrocities, now imposed enormous "reparations" demands on the conquered
German people. To date, they have extorted more than thirty-five
billion dollars from German workers, money which has been collected at
the points of bayonets, not Jewish bayonets, but the bayonets of the
American Army, which has been maintained as an occupying force in West
Germany for nearly four decades, solely to provide military power behind
the puppet German Government, which has as its primary function the
furnishing of money for the parasitic State of Israel.
Some twenty years after
World War II, the Jews began to fear that scholars might focus on the
terrible massacres of women and children during that war by armies
directed by the Jews. The incineration of thousands of families by mass
fire-bombings of the cities of Cologne, Hamburg, Berlin, Dresden and
other European cultural centers; the firestorms which killed many
thousands of families in Tokyo; as well as the nuclear holocausts
unleashed on civilian populations at Hiroshima and Nagasaki in the last
days of the Japanese War, when the Imperial Staff was already suing for
peace (the Jews did not want to lose this opportunity to test their new
Jewish Hell-Bomb on human targets); these and their numerous other war
crimes, began to concern the Jews. Their guilt was inescapable; it
seemed a mere matter of time until their crimes would call down
retribution on their heads. To forestall this possibility, the Jews
began a furious campaign of their own; a highly synchronized and
coordinated worldwide campaign publicising their new myth, the
"Holocaust", in which six million Jews were said to have been burned.
Six million Jews were also said to have been gassed. Whether this meant
there were actually twelve million Jews "killed" no one seems to know.
That holocausts, or mass
murders by fire, occurred during World War II was a matter of historical
record. There existed photographs of stacks of burned corpses, which
had been made in Cologne, Hamburg, and Dresden after the mass
fire-bombing of those cities by Allied aircraft. The problem the Jews
faced was that there had been no holocausts of Jewish victims during
World War II, nor were there any photographs of burned Jewish bodies.
Not to worry -- the Jews simply appropriated the photographs of the
bodies of their German victims, which are exhibited today in gruesome
"museums" in Germany as exhibits of dead Jews.
It was a matter of record
that the Jews had actually done quite well during World War II. In
Germany, incredible sagas of bribery and corruption on the home front
had secured the mass evacuation of all Jews from German cities just
before the fire bombings began. When entire German families perished
amid scenes of unspeakable horror, the Jews were safely exconced in
comfortable quarters in such refugee camps as Auschwitz. The ultimate
testimony as to their rescue by being segregated in these remote camps,
far from the danger of the mass bombing raids, comes from -- who else --
the Jews themselves. As they never cease to assure us -- they
"survived". Although they survived amid scenes of genocide or massacres
of non-Jews in many countries, they realized several decades later that
it was necessary for their purposes to claim that they had been
"exterminated". The protection camps in which they had been safely
segregated by the Germans during World War II now became "death camps".
Not only were they death camps, but they were camps such as Auschwitz,
memorialized in the Atlantic Monthly, Sept. 1981, as having "its own
soccer stadium, its own library, its own photo lab, and its own symphony
orchestra."
The same article proudly
boasts that "the hospital at Auschwitz grew to considerable size, with
about twenty doctors and more than three hundred nurses." This was a
"death camp?" The fact was that there was not a single German military
field hospital near any combat front as sizeable or as well-equipped as
the hospital at the "death camp" of Auschwitz, yet Auschwitz is always
cited by the Jews as the place were millions of Jews were "put to
death". The purpose of the large modern hospital has never been
satisfactorily explained, since the Jews now claim that within hours
after arriving at Auschwitz, the Jews were hurried to the "gas
chambers". This claim might have more validity had it not been
for one unfortunate oversight by the Jews -- they did not build the gas
chambers at Auschwitz until after World War II had ended.
Almost forty years after
the war, in which "six million Jews were murdered by the Nazis", as they
claim, there are annual festivals, conventions, and other mass
gatherings of many thousands of the "survivors of the death camps".
Even more peculiar, hardly any of these prosperous, healthy and well fed
"victims" claims to have been the survivor of only one "death camp".
Nearly all of them claim to have been a prisoner in five or six of the
camps, this at a time when Germany, fighting a two front war, could not
keep its troops supplied in the combat areas. The Jews ask us to
believe that every few months they were transferred from one camp, put
on a train and carried hundreds of miles to another "death camp" to be
killed, and then a few months later, apparently not having been killed,
they were entrained to yet another "death camp", where they remained
without being harmed until the end of the war.
The reason for the
otherwise inexplicable claims of the Jewish "Survivors" that they were
in many different "death camps" is revealed by a simple explanation,
"gelt". The "survivors" regularly receive monthly payments from the
conquered Germans. "Garfinckel" receives a monthly payment in Israel
from Germany because he was a prisoner in Auschwitz. "Rosenfeld"
receives a monthly payment from Germany in Israel because he was a
prisoner in Treblinka. "Steinberg" receives a regular monthly payment
in Israel from Germany because he was a prisoner in Dachau. Garfinckel,
Steinberg, and Rosenfeld -- you don't know them ? He's the same fat,
grinning Jew you saw in the news coverage of the Holocaust convention.
"BEWARE OF THE FABLES OF
THE JEWS". Titus 1:14. The Myth of the Holocaust, or the "vanished six
million Jews" is not solely a matter of collecting revenue from
defeated enemies. It is also one of the most powerful weapons of
propaganda in the hands of the Jews in their drive for total world
power. Today, all officials seeking to continue in office or to seek
higher office in the United States must not only make a ritual pledge of
eternal and unquestioning faith in the Myth of the Holocaust. To
question the Myth of the Holocaust means a challenge to the Jewish world
dictatorship, and it must be punished at once by the most severe
sentence. Thus the most fantastic elaborations on the basic lie of the
"Six million" appear regularly on American religious programs, in
educational books, and in the press.
Among the rare public
figures who have dared to question the Myth of the Holocaust are such
individualists as the actor Robert Mitchum, who told an Esquire
interviewer, in response to a question about "the six million", "So the
Jews say." "So the Jews say?" shrieked the horrified interviewer.
"Yeah," growled Mitchum, "so the Jews say." Another actor, Ronald
Reagan, while seeking public office, told a Jewish audience in
California that "It might help your cause if you would limit your claims
of victims to numbers that you could actually prove." A reporter noted
that "the audience began to hiss like geese, in a rapidly rising
cacophony while the aspiring politician dashed to the wings, never to
reappear in the particular auditorium."
Whatever Reagan's doubts
about "the six million", he has since kept them to himself. The Reagan
Administration will be remembered for the ultimate enshrinement of "the
final solution". Two government buildings on the Washington Mall have
now been given by "our government" to the Jews for a "Holocaust
Memorial". The Washington Mall, like the Roman Forum, is the center of
American aspirations for our Republic, and runs from the White House to
the Capital with its principal adornment the magnificent Washington
Monument. To the consternation of most Americans, the Washington
Monument can now be called "Jew Alley". Many native Washingtonians have
begun to express criticism of this amazing development. In the Washington Post,
April 25, 1983, William Raspberry writes on the editorial page, "I
simply don't understand it." He points out that although this is to be
an official American monument, neither the perpetrators nor the victims
were Americans. He quotes a Howard University professor as wondering
why there shouldn't be a Slavery Memorial on the Mall to honor the
memory of the slaves, or a Wounded Knee Memorial for the Indians. What
he doesn't say is that the erection of a Jewish Memorial on the
Washington Mall is a boast of absolute power, that the Jews have
achieved absolute power over their goyim slaves in America. We can
understand that there is a huge memorial to Karl Marx erected in Red
Square in Moscow. Are we incapable of understanding why a memorial to
the Jews is erected on the Washington Mall ?
Raspberry, who is black, goes on to tweak the big noses of his Jewish employers, the Meyer family who own the Washington Post,
by saying that "a pledge that nothing of this sort will ever be
permitted to happen again" worries him, because it is happening right
now. He doesn't mention the obvious example, the Rosh Hashanah Massacre
of Arab women and children in Lebanon, but of course Raspberry fails to
understand two crucial factors; first, that "it" never happened at
all, and second, that the Jews are attempting to place the rest of the
world on notice that "the Chosen People" are sacred, and that no one
must ever harm a hair on their heads. It's quite all right to massacre
all the goyim or non Jewish cattle, in Cambodia, Vietnam, Africa, or
Lebanon; this has nothing to do with the "sacred" presence of the Jew.
"Never Again!"
"Never Again?" the
well-publicized slogan of the Jews which refers to the Myth of the
Holocaust, should more properly be "Never", meaning that not only did it
never happen but that it is all right for the Jews to massacre the
gentile cattle whenever it suits their purposes, because the Myth of the
Holocaust gives carte blanche to the Jews to kill as many gentiles as
possible, "The diminution, the killing out of the Goyim," as old Anselm
so lustfully put it, because it is obvious that the more gentiles that
are killed, the fewer remain alive as a possible threat to the Jews.
The Myth of the Holocaust
is interpreted by the Jews as giving them permission to maintain
international murder squads whose assassins routinely carry out
executions in every country of the world, not only against "enemies of
Israel", but also against those who are merely suspected of being
"potential enemies of Israel". It pays to be careful. In no country
are the murder squads of the Mossad, the Israeli Intelligence Service,
given greater freedom than in the United States. Cooperation with the
Jewish assassins is the first line of business for the CIA, the FBI, and
the IRS. The Mossad routinely gives these government agencies lists of
American individuals on its hate lists, who are to be given "special
attention". These lists comprise more than half of all the IRS "special
audits" of American citizens.
Despite the frenetic
cooperation of official American bureaus with the Israeli assassins, the
favor is rarely returned. The Jews treat the American goyim with
justifiable contempt, and rarely lose an opportunity to spit in their
faces. Our Marines soon found this out in Lebanon, when the Israeli
soldiers routinely threatened them, offensively cut across Marine lines,
and shot at them. Menachem Begin's political stance at the present
time is to maintain a strong Israeli military presence in Lebanon,
despite President Reagan's frequent whines that the Israelis really
ought to pull out of that war torn country. At these requests, the
Israelis responded with the assassination of President Gemayel, and the
Rosh Hashanah Massacre of women and children. The latest requests for
Israeli withdrawal were met with the "mysterious" explosion which blew
up the U.S. Embassy in Beirut, with great loss of life. It is
confidently stated that this explosion will never be solved. As long as
the Jews, Walt Rostow and Henry Kissinger (both Zionists) were selling
out U.S. interests things were fine. Secretary Shultz must wonder when
Begin will order him to be murdered, and President Reagan and others as
well.
The Israelis are the most
likely suspects in the U.S. Embassy explosion. An extremist named Abu
Nidal was named in Jack Anderson's column, April 25, 1983, Washington Post,
that "secret State Dept. reports quoted two highly placed intelligence
sources explanation that the explosion was in Israel's interests as it
aided to 'divide and conquer' to disrupt the PLO by setting one faction
against the other. The sources said Israel had secretly provided funds
to Abu Nidal's group."
From the outset, the Myth
of the Holocaust has had its problems with "the numbers game". It has
not been easy to sell the story of the "extermination" of an entire
people, when that people is more numerous, more visible, more
prosperous, and more powerful in more countries than at any time during
its history. It is even more difficult to sell the story of "survivors
of death camps", who survived, not one year, but stays of four to six
years in "death camps", in which, according to the testimony of the
"Survivors", "everyone was being killed every day"; survival, not
merely in one "death camp", but tours of five or six camps over a period
of four to six years. The casualty rate would be higher on a bus tour
of the Bronx.
It took a certain amount of
raw courage to fix on the number of those "exterminated" at the magic
figure of "six million" during a period when the world census of Jews
showed an increase from ten million to twelve and a half million. Even
the most hardened Jews shrank from the certain exposure and censure of
peddling such fantastic lies to the most gullible of the goyim.
Fortunately, they did not have to. If Ronald Reagan expressed some
hesitancy at accepting the magic figure of six million early in his
career, other goyim, notably, the great evangelists, showed no such
qualms. There is now some rivalry among the million dollar a week
stooges who jumped on the Golden Bandwagon, but there seems to be little
doubt that it was not Billy James Hargis, the homosexual Bible-thumper,
but Billy Graham, "that nice boy from North Carolina," who first struck
gold in the Myth of the Holocaust. Graham soon proved that his loyalty
to God was surpassed only by his loyalty to the State of Israel, while
Billy James Hargis and Rev. Carl McIntire huffed and puffed in his
well-tailored rear. In recent years, they have been surpassed by two
even smoother peddlers of "fundamentalist Christianity", Jerry Falwell
and Pat Robertson. Each day these servile shabez goi pay homage to the
Myth of the Six Million, urging their bewitched television audience to
send more money to them, and of course, to Israel. Although their cut
comes off the top, Israel does get a fair share of the take, but the
supposed recipient of all of their fund-raising, God, is said to get
nothing at all.
Although the United States
boasts of being the birthplace of "investigative journalism", where an
aggressive Mike Wallace thrusts a microphone into the face of a cringing
quack while denouncing him for overcharging an elderly patient for an
aspirin, the Myth of the Holocaust continues to enjoy complete immunity
from the prying activities of ten thousand young journalists who dream
of the Pulitzer Prize, the Book of the Month Club, and the Hollywood
contract. These dreams can become reality, as Woodward and Bernstein
discovered when they published their White House fantasies as fact, but
the Myth of the Six Million is secure from any invasion by these "great
journalists" or any of their compatriots, as none of them dare to
question the sanctity of this never-to-be-questioned figure.
For years, Jews refused to
provide any proof acceptable in court which would substantiate these
claims, even though a $50,000 reward was offered for proof that any Jew
had been gassed in any type of "Holocaust" operation during World War
II, yet this astonishing offer never excited the curiosity of any
"investigative journalist" in America. In the ordinary course of
events, a twenty dollar bill or a two-Martini lunch is all that is
required to set them on the track. Until these highly trained
professionals take up the scent along the dog-run, we continue to be
plagued by the Jewish claims that six million of their brightest and
their best were foully done to death during World War II. If a $50,000
offer could not bring forth proof of even one death, how much would it
cost to find proof that six million died ?
The record shows that only
Christians have been the victims of the historic massacres. The Jews,
when they did not do the killing themselves, as they always prefer to
do, were always in the background as the only instigators of these
crimes against humanity. We can and we must protect ourselves against
the blood-thirsty bestiality of the Jew by every possible means, and we
must be aware that the Christian creed of love and mercy can be
overshadowed by the Jewish obsession that all non Jews are animals to be
killed.
_________________ Addendum: By Wm. S. LeGrande
The foregoing account of
the jews shows that jews desire to destroy all non-jews that they
consider dangerous to them and to rule the others. The Christians and
Arabs are high on their list for murder. The evils of the jews are
countless. Deceit and lies are two of their best tools. They love the
"God's Chosen" lie. The jews are mostly Khazars. Khazars have no
identity with Israelites at all. The jew lie on this subject is carried
by Christian churches out of ignorance or as a pay-off for favors.
During the time of Christ, the jews were Israelite mixtures and this and
the Talmudic idiocy is what Christ condemned the Pharisees for.
The next lie is that Christ
was a jew. Nowhere in the Bible is Christ referred to as a jew. The
Bible says Christ was an Israelite. The present day Israelites are central European Christians and their descendants in accordance with Bible prophecy.
To make a strong case for
these jew lies and deception we find that Jesus said that the Talmudic
jews were of their father the devil. He said they were liars, thieves,
murderers and were adulterers. The word adulterer is so wide in
scope that the jews make sure it is avoided. The jews even changed the
commandment "Thou shalt not adulterate" to "Thou shalt not commit
adultery". "Thou shalt not covet they neighbor's wife" covers the
intended reference. Adulterate takes in the total scale of evil.
Adulterate means mix, make impure, change, unnatural, deceit, debase,
pollute, contaminate, false, lie, corrupt, pervert, wicked, cruel,
sinful and all manner of evil practiced by the jews in their pursuit of
deceit as demonstrated in the writing, "The Secret Holocaust" by Eustace
Mullins. Christ told us the jews were adulterers.
This brings us to the "Six
Million Holocaust" lie that Dr. Butz's book "The Hoax of the Twentieth
Century" so ably describes. Mullins explains how this was profitable to
the jews. But it was also a necessity that the World War II and the
Six Million lie be kept alive. The real Holocaust is the Sixty-Six
Million Holocaust that the jews performed and engineered in Russia. The
cruelties that went with it are unthinkable as explained by Mullins.
This is not like the German Six Million which is a coverup for the
Sixty-Six Million, and is a proven known truth and a dress rehearsal for
the torture and death of the other world Christians and Moslems.
The Arabs can tell you what
they have gone through in the last few years and are still going
through today. How can this be ? The jews brag that it is "our
terrible power of the purse"! Even today, U.S. citizens don't know the
jews own the U.S. money system known as the "Federal Reserve System",
and even though the U.S. Congress is able to change it, they are too
cowardly in the face of death that awaits them.
Likewise, when the jews
tell Congress to send aid to brother jews in Russia, or to the Israelis,
or to send your sons to war for jew profit, the Congress obeys without
hesitation, and they do it promptly. The jew-controlled news media sees
that the citizens approve also.
So when you hear the word
"holocaust" remember that there is a big lie six million holocaust that
the Germans were accused of, and there is a true sixty-six million
holocaust that the jews keep covered up. It is like the first little
boy who knocked the daylights out of the second little boy, and the
first boy immediately started screaming, "He hit me ! He hit me!" The
innocent second little boy found out how shouts prevailed, as in the
case of the Crucifixion of Jesus Christ. The second little boy was
punished. The lying first little boy went free. So it is every day
with the jews in Russia and communism world-wide, and the Israelis in
the Palestine area. Their lying shouts prevail; and with the terrible
power of the purse and lying press, they forge ahead.
Christ died for our sins
that we may have eternal light and joy, but Christians today must fight
and resist the jew devil in righteous anger or receive torture,
suffering and death; because that is what this evil Talmudic-crazed jew
element (not humans) have in store for all resistors.
Look at Poland and all
jew-communist controlled areas of the world. Poland is 90% Catholic and
anti-jew-communist. However, they are still prisoners of the jews.
This is only one example. The commandment says "thou shalt not
murder". Death is the punishment for breaking a commandment.
This addendum points out
that the jews are not chosen people. Jesus Christ was not a jew. The
jews lie about jewish extermination in a German holocaust. The real
holocaust was a Christian Holocaust by jews of sixty-six million, mostly
Christians.
__________________________
“For 1800 years has the blood of Christ been upon the Jews. Driven from
Judea — without country, without home — strangers amongst strangers —
hated, yet feared — have they wandered from nation to nation bearing
with them the visible signs of God’s curse. Like Cain marked with a
mysterious sign, they shall continue to wander till the end of the
world.”
The Point -February.1955
_____________________
DID FR. FEENEY PREDICT THE LOSS OF THE POPE? – FROM OUR BOOK ON SALVATION
Before I get into this point, I must remind the reader that we are not “Feeneyites” and that I had never heard of Fr. Leonard Feeney
when I came to the same conclusion on the absolute necessity of water
baptism based on the dogmatic teaching of the Catholic Church. We don’t
agree with some of Fr. Feeney’s conclusions on Justification (we
believe he was mistaken in good faith on these points).
In the following passages from Fr. Feeney’s book, Bread of Life—which
is made up of Fr. Feeney’s sermons before Vatican II—he connects the
eventual loss of the pope (i.e., what we have experienced with the reign
of the Vatican II antipopes) to the denial of the dogma Outside the
Catholic Church There is No Salvation.
Fr. Leonard Feeney S.J., Bread of Life, pp.
32-33:“We have Protestants in an arrangement-religion that never knows
what to call itself from one week to another, that never knows what its
new minister is going to tell it from chapter to chapter of Holy
Scripture. We have Unitarians who have no faith in the assured Jesus,
getting more indefinite about what Christianity meant to say. And, of
course, we have Jews evading the Faith, running away from it, pretending
they do not hear the name of Jesus – pretending Christmas is not the
birth of Jesus Christ, and getting civic leaders to remove ‘Merry
Christmas’ from in front of City Hall and to substitute for it ‘Seasons
Greetings,’ because the word ‘Christ’ in ‘Christmas’ annoys them. All
this, horrible as it is, I am prepared to cope with.
“But
imagine a priest in the Holy Roman Catholic Church, ordained by the
successors of the Apostles – dedicated to the Name and purpose and Blood
and robes of Jesus – sitting at Harvard College week after week and
listening to religion being lectured about in invisible terms. And
imagine their going back, then, to their people and telling them about
the ‘soul of the Church,’ of ‘salvation outside the Church through
sincerity’ – apart from the teachings and Sacraments of Jesus Christ;
and calling this arrangement ‘Baptism of Desire’... What kind of teaching is that? That is Christmas without the manger: Good Friday without any God bleeding; Easter Sunday without any Flesh and Blood coming out of the tomb. That is the Christian Faithwithout any Pope – the most visible religious leader in the World!”
Fr. Feeney, writing the above passage before the Second Vatican Council, predicted the eventual loss of the pope
because of the great number of heretics within the structures of the
Church who denied the necessity of the Church for salvation. This is an
amazing insight!
Fr. Feeney also notes that this heresy against
the salvation dogma and the necessity of Baptism leads to “Good Friday
without any God bleeding.” Just take a look at the Novus Ordo churches
to see if that has been fulfilled. Fr. Feeney goes on to say in the
same chapter:
Fr. Feeney S.J., Bread of Life, p.
42:“When the Vatican Council reconvenes, I humbly plead with our Holy
Father, the Pope (Pius XII), that he will immediately gather his
plenipotentiary powers of infallible pronouncement to clear up the wild
confusion of visible orating (on the part of his priests and bishops)
about an invisible Church – or else the gates of Hell will have all but
prevailed against us. The most visible ruler in the world, our Holy Father, in his white robe and white zuchetto, may as well take off his triple tiaraand
get down from his golden throne, and leave Christianity to the kind of
committee arrangements to which it is committed in the present-day
America, if we keep on preaching ‘Baptism of Desire.’”
As can be seen on our video Vatican II: Council of Apostasy and on our website, this statement underlined above—the loss of the papal tiara—actually took place
when Antipope Paul VI happily surrendered the papal tiara and papal
pectoral cross to the representatives of the United Nations who in turn
sold it to a Jewish merchant!
When Antipope Paul VI gave away the Papal Tiara, it was symbolic of the giving away of Papal authority (although he had none to give away since he was an antipope). But
it was symbolic of how the enemies of the Church, and the non-Catholic
heretics, had been allowed to take over the Church’s physical structures
and create a counterfeit, non-Catholic sect (the Vatican II sect).
This insight of Fr. Feeney on the Papal Tiara is so accurate that God
must have put these words into his mouth. But it just demonstrates
again that once the necessity of the Church is denied the rest of the
Faith becomes meaningless. This is why those who think that the Mass
issue is the main issue, and where the battle really lies, are
mistaken. The battle begins and is centered around this dogma, because
once the necessity of the Catholic Faith is denied then everything else
becomes meaningless.
_________________
Bread of Life-By Fr. Leonard Feeney, S.J. 1952
Father Leonard Feeney (b. Lynn, Massachusetts 1897-02-18 - d. Ayer,
Massachusetts 1978-01-30 ) was a U.S. Jesuit priest who defended the
strict interpretation of the Roman Catholic doctrine, extra Ecclesiam
nulla salus ("outside The Church there is no salvation"), arguing that
baptism of blood and baptism of desire are unavailing and that therefore
no non-Catholics will be saved. He fought against what he perceived to
be the liberalization of Catholic doctrine, which opened the way for the non-Catholic Vatican II sect with its antipopes, starting with Angelo Roncalli, the 33rd degree Freemason, a.k.a antipope John XXIII.
This is a billboard we are
currently running on one of the busiest highways in the country
(Interstate 405). It’s right outside Los Angeles, CA. The billboard
started on July 10, 2014. It’s estimated that 723,000 people see the
billboard each week. Donations can help us put up more billboards across the country so that people find the truth.
Subject: Spotted:
"The Website TheyDon't Want You to See!"
Dear Brothers,
I was driving down the 405/110 freeway in Los Angeles CA when I
spotted a billboard with your web address. I so so pleased to see it.
California is experiencing such demonic actions… The people need to know
the truth. Thank you for your time.
GOD bless you and the work you do.
Maria Reed
Subject: I saw one of your signs off of the 405 Fwy in CA!
Dear Dimond Brothers –
I was very happy to see your signage. I hope people will go to your
website. I think it was easily viewable from the Southbound 405.
