Friday, February 27, 2015

The Survey Strikes Back! Saturday 28 February, 2015. Ferial Day

The Survey Strikes Back -  Survey No. 2


Background and Recapping

Having completed the First Survey on Climate Change Questions earlier this week, and being initially disappointed at the results, I decided to do a follow-up one with a slightly different approach, using the original question posed by the GWRC, ( by rephrasing their question without altering the intent), but this time examining one important aspect of the GWRC question, which, as one person taking part in the survey pointed out... "the question was a 'loaded' one" ... 

With a newly phrased question on the same topic of "Climate Change," I completed the survey on Friday 27 February, 2015 outside the New World Supermarket, Stokes valley, Lower Hutt, on that same afternoon, and so without any further ado .... here are the results of the 2nd follow-up Survey on a question of "Climate Change."


The Results

As in the first survey, I limited the number of the sample to 64, to keep it in line with the first survey, the response to the new question, "DO YOU KNOW WHAT THE IMPACTS ARE OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON THIS REGION?" are outlined as follows:


Number of Sample  ...............   64


YES .........................................  26

NO ...........................................  13

NOT SURE .............................  25



As a Percentage of the total sample :


YES ..................  40.62%


NO ..................... 20.31%


NOT SURE ...... 39.06%



The Pie-Chart

This second Pie-Chart, in contrast to the earlier one, shows a dramatic reversal  from that of the first survey, ( as shown below) even given that the new question was deliberately phrased to ascertain exactly, what the understanding of residents of this area was in relation to one very important point in the GWRC's question on "Climate Change," which they were careful to misrepresent. 


Pie-Chart - results of the Second Stokes Valley Survey


Comparing the Two Surveys ( note  what happens when you ask a slightly different question the GWRC were not prepared to risk asking!)



"Do you know what the Impacts are of Climate Change in this region?"

"Should we protect the Wellington Region from Climate Change?"



The time has come for all good men ( and the ladies 8-) ) to come to the aid of the party ...




I think it's a pretty interesting result carried out under the same conditions in both surveys ( apart from a little wind factor which had my highly organized link handouts for the survey results, fluttering about on the ground outside the supermarket! )

So, having got this far, I will try and post this (blogger willing), and invite any comments you may have, on the survey, any action you may think is necessary, etc., etc.,  as I think about my reply to the submission request by the GWRC April 10, 2015 .....  which will be based around my ongoing research, and posted on this blogsite by mid-March, 2015, at the latest, for people to read and acquaint themselves with the issues, and hopefully make their own submission to the GWRC by 10 April, 2015.


And, I once again thank all those who so patiently took the brief(?) time to participate in this survey, which I consider to be pretty important, maybe not the most ...but important enough to do something about!


Special Request-Neil Diamond

the low volume of sound on some of these videos is unfortunate

Tuesday, February 24, 2015

A Random Survey - A Question Of Climate Change? Tuesday 24 February, 2015. St. Matthias, AP

Random Survey on GWRC Climate Change Question? - Stokes Valley, Tuesday 24 February, 2015


Sunrise - Auckland

Midwinter - Christchurch

Cumulonimbus - Christchurch

Towering Cumulus - South New Brighton - Christchurch

Fog - Avon River, Christchurch


Towering Cumulus - Stokes Valley, Lower Hutt

Cumulonimbus - Stokes Valley, Lower Hutt






"Nice pictures, but where's the results of that

 survey you did the last two days  ...

 you promised you would have it out possibly

 today or at the latest tomorrow, and here

 you are showing us all your weather pictures!"  

And well, you may ask ... 


But, I just decided since I am doing it on

 this blog, let's try and make it as interesting

as possible ...  with a pretty picture ... problem

was  I couldn't decide which one to use, so ...

well, you can see what I did ...  


First, (well almost) , let me take the opportunity

to thank you all for being so generous and good

humored in partaking in this little survey,

which was  largely in response the ad which

appeared in the Hutt News , February 17, 1015,

(see below) ...  


I tried to phrase the question in a manner similar

to that which the GWRC used in the ad, without

altering its sense, and to avoid influencing

respondents as they completed the survey.


What did the people understand about the subject

and how would they react to this survey and the

GWRC's invitation to submit an opinion on

Climate Change as outlined in their

advertisement, of which this survey was drawing

attention to ... I was soon to find out ... as you will

see in the results below...


I thought it would be an interesting assignment,

giving me an insight into  whether this was of

concern to the people in this region and what their

understanding of the GWRC's plan was based on ... 


My Background

I thought, at this point, it would be useful to acquaint

you all with a little bit of my background, before

I proceed further, which should help you see and

appreciate just where I am coming from with my

interest in this subject:


I am not a Climate Scientist, or a mathematician

or a physicist ( although I do hold a tertiary

qualification in Botany and Geography!). 

I was employed with the N.Z. Meteorological

Service as a Technician/Observer for some

25 years, having been fascinated by weather as

a kid of about 8 or 9 years of age, and was

set on becoming a "Weatherman" 8-D ...  when

I left college ... which  I eventually did ...

and so weather has always been by passion,

my work, my hobby ( home weather stations)

ever since I can remember ...


So, with all that in mind, I think am pretty much

up-to-date with the current situation regarding

both "weather' and "climate" to the point

where anything is passed off as science on an

unwary public, and is obviously not, I am not

hesitant in stepping forward and exposing the lie.

I was alerted back in June, 2014, when an article

appeared in the Stokes Valley Times, pushing the

same agenda, and actually organised a leaflet drop

campaign alerting people to this plan by the GWRC

with the help of three ladies (whose names I cannot

now recall) who between the three (possibly more)

of us managed to distribute over 100 leaflets all

around Wellington, encouraging people to make

submissions ( see following for details) ...


I found the results on their website the other day for

the first time, and they state that 85 people made

submissions, and only one person said it

( Climate Change ) was normal ... and that would

have been myself or at least several other ladies

who were quite strongly opposed to their plans

 ... what happened to their submissions???  


On January 7,  2015, this appeared in the

Upper Hutt Leader, indicating that in spite of our

submissions back in June 2014, giving overwhelming

evidence that their plans were based on a lie based

on fiddled science, because we knew at the time

that there had been no global warming of earth's

atmosphere for 17 years and 3 months, and

counting, indicating they had totally ignored our

submissions based on credible science and were

obviously determined to plough on regardless ... 

unfortunately, for them, and fortunately for us,

there is a growing number people who have

awoken to their scheming ... and are NOT prepared

to be silenced.



That's enough for now, except to mention that

after I have summarized the survey for you all,

( about time, I hear you say!)  it is my intention

to submit my 'say' either in the form of a blog,

e-mail or something, exposing this fraud, with

damning evidence that they are about to waste

public funds on a lie, for that is what it truly is;

hopefully I will have completed that task by

at least the 10/12th March, 2015,

(they are asking for submissions by 10 April, 2015)

and giving, I hope, people a chance to check out

evidence presented on this blog, to help them make

an informed decision which they can then submit to

 GWRC before April 10, 2015 !



The Result of the 23/24 February 2015  Survey

"GWRC Climate Change Questionaire"

 - Stokes Valley, Lower Hutt.   


The Question posed in the survey was:

"Should We Protect the Wellington Region

From Climate Changes?"



 *                    *                   *                   *                     *


The total number of the people sampled was 64


The number of YES in favor of some action

 by the GWRC was ... 58


The number of NO against any action

 by the GWRC was ............... 1


The number of NOT SURE about the

whole thing was ...................  5


For a total of .....................   64 



*              *             *            *             *            *


As a percentage of total sampled:


(initial manual calculation in brackets- being of a noted

'bucket' chemist species type)


YES   ...............    90.625  (87.5%)

NO    ................      1.56%  (1.6%)

NOT SURE .....      7.81%  (8.3 %)


That's meant to add up to 100%, which it doesn't ...

in my initial calculations ...

but tomorrow I will hop onto the internet ...

and use a calculator ....and now(tomorrow 8-) )

...  it looks much better 8-)



*               *             *             *             *              *


Also I will put in a pretty colored - drawn pie - cart

...oops, I meant ... chart (non -edible variety) ,

but it's been a long day and ....

it was fun and interesting talking and meeting you all , it's good night from me ..... zzzzzz until tomorrow ...











 all this talk about "Pies" has made me a bit 

peckish ..... but I will get round to doing that 


promise - after I have finished off the remaining

 247.5 deg of pie remaining ...





WITH ME ON THIS POST - However there is

more than one way to 'skin the cat'  It doesn't read

as well , but, can at least

read it, or most of it ..... 8-) ... I've done the pie chart 

 thing - just got to color it in, so check back today ... 

and, guess what ?  I've finally discovered why silly 

blogger is mucking up my posts :




Definitions & The Review:




Weather - Is the state of the atmosphere

( temperature, wind, atmospheric pressure,

precipitation, sunshine, humidity etc.,)  in a given

particular place, at a given time, lasting usually only

a short time of a day or so... 


Climate - Is the average weather experienced in a place,

usually averaged out over a period of 30 years or so,

and subject to fluctuations (changes), (as history has

recorded), and will no doubt do so in the future,

regardless of man's attempts to stop it doing so, and,

as man has adapted successfully to changes in climate

in the past, there is little doubt he/she will do so again. 



As a schoolboy once remarked, "Climate lasts

 all the time; weather only a few days."

[Well, he nearly got it right, didn't he?]





I was initially a little disappointed with the results

as my 'carefully thought-out' survey proceeded,

expecting, at least, to get a few  NO's ... and as I walked

back home, I asked myself ( I usually talk to myself,

and you will know if you've ever, by chance struck me

in the local Supermarket, picking up my daily

un-fluoridated bottled spring water) 


 'did I ask the wrong question'?  


... 'Were the participants influenced by factors I had

 overlooked, like my random selection of colors on the

form, or were people influenced by all the YES ticks

starting to dominate my score sheet, sending them

a message that 'since everyone agrees, it must be the

right choice?'  


And a few other questions crossed my mind....

However, I consoled myself in the knowledge that,

at least, if my survey wasn't proving anything, and

I had wasted my precious time ( like falling behind

on my ukulele playing, which I should really call

 'practice' ( with a 'c') because that's what it really is,

and I need plenty of that 8-D, at least I had the

satisfaction of getting people to start thinking about

the topic, and maybe take enough interest to start

doing a bit of their own research and not taking

'as gospel' what the 'experts' want us to believe in ...

And making an informed submission to the GWRC

commenting on their 'plan.' 


The Loaded Question


One gentleman, interestingly, did make a thought-

provoking comment, when he said, a bit indignantly,

 and rightfully so, "hang on there a minute, mate ...

that's a loaded question!" 


A Loaded question, indeed ... worded to present

Climate Change as something to be feared, avoided,

wary of, not a naturally occurring thing, harmful

to man-kind, when in actual fact it has been going on


for thousands of years, and, guess what, mankind

has survived it, putting on an extra woollen pullover

when it gets a bit colder, slipping into our summer

 'jamas and shorts etc., when it gets a little warmer.... 

gotta' get that pie -chart done.....8-(


Done!   (My very Own First PIE-CHART !)












WARNING!    Do Not be tempted to try a piece of my

 "pie" as it has artificial coloring added which may

pose serious health problems, like affecting your eyesight ....



Foot note: 

For those who were interested in the Christchurch

Earthquakes,   link...   


P.S.  If someone out there knows anything about

 blogging ...(more than I do) ... could they please,

after they have proof-read this lot, put the

 spare ")"  ... I forgot to put in there ...

I don't want try and do it myself, 'cos

it's bound to make this blog worser than it

 already is  8-( 

...thank you 8-D


p.p.s.    I just found an extra "i" missing somewhere in there, and because

 of Murphy's Law (remember him?) I daren't put him to the test, again..

appreciate if some could insert it in the correct place, otherwise everybody

will have to do their own editing 8 -D, which will save me heaps of time...







Of Young Ladies From Stoke's Valley Debating

The Issue After Completing The Survey












A group of young Ladies from Stoke's Valley 

who completed the survey - debating the issue ...

and come to the correct conclusion ....












It's the Sun!




And come to the correct conclusion - 

"It's the Sun!"




Statistics Update:




*                     *                       *                      *                    *


Now I expect you all to go home now and do a bit of homework ...

...and to help you out here are a couple of links you could start on...

and because you have all been so good, kind and patient with me ....

and you didn't take a bit out of my "pie" ( as I warned you) ....enjoy


and....join in, if you fell like singing ....

and...Christmas is not far off  ... what about a carol?

Sorry the above text is difficult to read, and I did try to

format, but it went crazy!    So I decided to leave

well-enough, alone ..... so I now devote this song


to blogger



Nearly Forgot - I did promise someone - remember? 

Both Sides Now  ....'I really don't know clouds at all'.....

..from the album "Clouds"

Lyrics in case you want to sing along!

(Joni Mitchell)

Rows and floes of angel hair

And ice cream castles in the air

And feather canyons ev'rywhere

I've looked at clouds that way

But now they only block the sun

They rain and snow on ev'ryone

So many things I would have done

But clouds got in my way 


I've looked at clouds from both sides now

From up and down, and still somehow

It's cloud illusions I recall

I really don't know clouds at all 


Moons and Junes and Ferris wheels

The dizzy dancing way you feel

As ev'ry fairy tale comes real

I've looked at love that way

But now it's just another show

You leave 'em laughing when you go

And if you care, don't let them know

Don't give yourself away 


I've looked at love from both sides now

From give and take, and still somehow

It's love's illusions I recall

I really don't know love at all

Tears and fears and feeling proud

To say "I love you" right out loud

Dreams and schemes and circus crowds

I've looked at life that way

But now old friends are acting strange

They shake their heads, they say I've changed

Well something's lost, but something's gained

In living ev'ry day 


I've looked at life from both sides now

From win and lose and still somehow

It's life's illusions I recall

I really don't know life at all

I've looked at life from both sides now

From up and down, and still somehow

It's life's illusions I recall

I really don't know life at all    



Monday, February 23, 2015

World Government By The Jews.Monday 23 February, 2015. St. Peter Damian, BCD; Vigil of St. Matthias, AP

World Government By The Jews - Edited Under Fr. Leonard Feeney M.I.C.M   The Point  January, 1955


Of the 1,800 executives employed at United Nations headquarters in New York City, over 1,200 are Jews.


In its current report in the American Jewish Yearbook, the American Jewish Committee labels opposition to the United Nations as anti-semitism.


David Ben-Gurion, first Prime Minister of the State of Israel, told American newsmen in an interview in 1948,  "The United Nations ideal is a Jewish ideal."

                           *       *      *      *      *

Every day there is new evidence that the American people are waking up to the fact that World Communism is a movement fostered and run by Jews.   But, even more urgent for Americans to know, and much less publicized, is the fact that the Jews are likewise the promoters of the United Nations.

Whatever the apparent differences between these two Jewish projects, the U.N. and Communism (and the differences are only apparent), one similarity is overwhelmingly evident.   Both the U.N. and Communism are means to the establishment of a central and absolute world control - which control is precisely what the Jews want.

For twenty centuries the Jewish nation has toiled to destroy in the world the Kingship of Jesus Christ.   And to seal this destruction, the Jews have plotted a world Jewish empire, dominating all the nations of the earth, so that the message of Christ the King will be forever stifled.

To this silencing of Christian apostles, all Jews are urged in their prime source of religious counsel, the Talmud.    And, concerning this Jewish determination, Saint Paul warns in his First Epistle to the Thessalonians, Chapter 2:  "The Jews, who both killed the Lord Jesus, and the prophets, and have persecuted us, and please not God, and are adversaries to all men; prohibiting us to speak to the Gentiles that they may be saved."

The Obstacle


In order  to make the U.N. work for their purpose, the Jews knew from the start that the United States of America would be a chief obstacle.   America's traditional wariness of foreign entanglements ( which accounted for the failure of the old League of Nations) would have to be eliminated.    And there was a deeper reason for concentrating on America.

When the smoke of World War II cleared away, the Jews rejoiced to see how much they had accomplished in their ancient battle against Christ and His Church.   In all of the leading nations of the earth, the Catholic Faith had been tragically devitalized, or had disappeared entirely.   In only one of the strong nations of the world was there any chance that the Faith might take hold of the people.   America, with its 50,000 Catholic priests, its 150,000 nuns, and its abundance of Catholic churches and schools, needed only the spark of a few zealous apostles to be set ablaze with Catholic belief.     If the U.N. Jews were to bring America into line, they would have to work quickly.    And they did.

Selling the U.S. the U.N.

One of the surest ways of getting the U.S. into the U.N. was to get the U.N. into America.    The Jews realized that it would be difficult for America suddenly to pull out of the U.N. once the organization was firmly established on the banks of New York's East River.

And quite as effectively, the Jews prepared the way for the U.N.'s "one world" ideal by a long and concentrated indoctrination of the American people with purposeful Jewish slogans.    Through all public media, Americans were told that everyone ought to be like everyone else, that nationality, race, and religion have no real significance and should be set aside for the sake of achieving what the Jews called "Brotherhood."

Thus, it happened that when the U.N. came into being, the American people were quite prepared to accept an organization that was nation-less, race-less, and creed-less.    And the Jews turned their publicizing energies to an all-out, pro-U.N. campaign.     Professor Mortimer Adler, noted Jewish intellectual, voiced the official Jewish line when he said,  "We must do everything we can to abolish the United States.   The only answer to the threat of atomic war is world government." (Cleveland Plain Dealer, Oct. 23, 1945).

Propaganda for the U.N. was an openly Jewish enterprise, and every Jew, whether officially attached to the U.N. or not, was on call to lend his propagandizing talents.    A member of the American Jewish Committee was given by UNESCO the express job of developing a "nation-wide educational program" for promoting U.N. aims and principles.     And supervising all phases of the effort to win America to the U.N. was the Jew, Benjamin Cohen, head of the United Nations Department of Public Information.

The Deception

The ultimate appeal in all this Jewish propaganda was that the U.N., and only the U.N. could guarantee peace to America.    War-weary Americans, even those who were unmoved by the Jew's earlier "Brotherhood" slogans, turned eagerly to the U.N. that it was, as advertised, an organization "determined to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war."

After nine years of U.N. peace -promotion, however, during which billions of American dollars have been spent in arming the world, and tens of thousands of American boys have been wounded and killed on foreign battlefields, the American people are coming to realize that they have been the victims of a colossal deceit.

The true nature of this deceit is yet to be grasped by most Americans.     For the U.N. is not, as might be supposed, a peace movement which failed.     The U.N. is a sinister design for governing the day-to-day activities of the peoples of all nations.

The U.N. is a world revolution.


The Threat

Peacefully, without firing a shot, the U.N. is now poised to accomplish the ancient Talmudic purposes of the Jewish nation: the crushing of the Catholic Church and the establishment of a central Jewish world control.    Although the real intent of the U.N. has been most deliberately hidden, Americans are becoming daily more alerted to this intent and to the peril which threatens their country.

Even more urgent, however, is the necessity that American Catholics be made aware of all that will befall their Church, if the U.N. plot is successful.  To its readers, therefore, The Point offers a summary of what the U.N. intends for them - as Americans and, more intimately, as Catholics.

The U.N. Versus Americans

The only way for the U.N. to conduct a bloodless revolution in America is to get the American Government to consent, somehow, to its own destruction.    By taking advantage of the vulnerable clause in our Constitution, the Jews have found a way of obtaining such consent, through the instrumentality of U.N. Covenants.    These are ordinances which would inflict upon America's a whole new way of life, and which are proposed to our country under the guise of treaties.

The American Constitution contains the express provision that any treaty which is ratified by the United States Senate becomes a part of the internal law of the country.   Indeed, it becomes, in effect, superior to the Constitution itself - so that rights guaranteed to Americans by their Constitution could be taken away from them by properly ratified treaties.       And for a treaty to be ratified and become the law of the land, not even a quorum of voting Senators is necessary.     All that is required is that two-thirds of the Senators present in the Senate Chamber, at any given time, vote in its favor.   On June 13, 1952, for example, three treaties were ratified with only two Senators present in the Senate.

Thus, if a U.N. Covenant-treaty were introduced on a quiet summer afternoon, when only three members were present in the Senate, it would require the assenting vote of only two of the Senators to impose upon the American people some major portion of the Jews' unbloody revolution.

Here are some representative examples of what will happen if the U.N. Covenant- treaties - many of which are now pending before the U.S. Senate - should be ratified. 

1.  The Bill of Rights in our American Constitution will be supplanted by the U.N. Covenant of Human Rights.   This means that our present unqualified guarantees of free speech, press, and assembly will be according to the terms of the Covenant, "subject to certain penalties, liabilities, and restrictions."

2.   Judges in American courts will be forced to make their decisions in conformity with U.N. -directed principles.   A preview of this came in the recent Fuji case, when a California court overrode a state law on the grounds that it seemed to conflict with the United States Charter.

3.    American citizens will be obliged to obey laws imposed upon them by the U.N. and, for violating these laws, will be liable to trial by international courts.   By way of preparing the people for this situation, certain internationalists in our Government have lately arranged that American troops stationed in foreign should be subject both to the laws of those countries and to legal prosecution in their courts.

4.    All American gold resources will be taken over by a central monetary control.    The U.N. has already demonstrated how generous it can be with the money of American taxpayers.    Under the auspices of the United Nations relief and Rehabilitation Association, U.S. currency plates, plus supplies of Treasury Department ink and paper, were handed over to the Russians, with no control over the amount of American-backed money which they could print.   This project was the brain-child of the Treasury Department Jews, Harry Dexter White and Harold Glasser, and recived the quiet blessing of Jewish UNRRA head, Herbert Lebman.

5.   American soldiers will be part of an international military pool.   They will be obliged to fight under the leadership of U.N. Generals, against whatever enemy the U.N. may designate, even if that enemy be the U.S.A.


6.   The U.N. will reserve the right, under its "full employment" program, to tell a man what job he must work at, what wages he must receive, and in what part of what country he must find employment.


7.    Under the U.N.'s World Health Program,, there will be mandatory, standardized Government care for everyone suffering from "any morbid condition, whatever its cause, from birth to death,"    This program of socialized medicine further provides for mass inoculations, the killing of incurables, and a system of "planned populations," which will mean birth control in some areas, and baby-bonuses in others.

8.    The U.N. will establish a universal and compulsory system of education designed to safeguard and perpetuate its own regime.   By provision of the U.N. Charter, education shall "promote understanding ... and further the activities of the United Nations."    Illustrative of what tone this mental regimentation will take was the announcement that the U.N.'s official history of the world was to be entrusted to the celebrated atheist, Julian Huxley.

Thus, by American adoption of U.N. Covenant-treaties, American citizens will become citizens of the world, and the Jews will have triumphed in their bloodless revolution.

The U.N. Versus Catholics

Just as the U.N. will require that America be stripped of her individuality and sovereignty, and permitted to keep only those political and cultural features which she might have in common with Communists and Zulus, so also will the U.N. demand that the Catholic Church be purged of her singular and intransigent doctrines and allowed only those basic expressions of religion which she might appear to share with Mohammedans and Holy Rollers.    For, in the coming revolution, the religious effect of the U.N. Covenant-treaties will be to enforce, as rigid law, those "Brotherhood" slogans which the Jews have so widley propagated in our country.

No longer will the Jews merely suggest that "It makes no difference what a man believes,"    They will insist that this is so, and establish proper penalties for any Catholic priest who, convinced that what a man believes makes all the difference in the world, is determined to convert his fellow Americans to the Catholic Faith.

"One religion is as good as another" will cease to be a glib, billboard sentiment.   It will become a stern, inflexible law.   To administer this law, the Jews will have to suppress our parochial schools, not only because they teach that the Catholic Church is the only true, one, but because by their very existence, they proclaim that the religion of a Catholic child is something so precious and unique that it justifies his being guarded and set apart from other children.

And for the legal  enforcement of the Jew's "tolerance" slogans, U.N. Covenant-treaties make clear provision that no religious utterances, ceremonies, or symbols shall discriminate against, or cause "mental harm" to, members of other religious groups.    Already the Jews have indicated what they mean by this.    Abundantly they have protested that Crucifixes, New Testaments, and public mentions of Jeus Christ are incitements to anti-semitism and slights to the Jewish community.

Here are two recent, frightening examples of how far the "one world" Jews intend to go:


1.   They have filed an international protest against the traditional, Catholic Passion Play of Oberammergau, charging that it |leads to anti-semitism."

2.   They have succeeded in removing the white crosses which marked the graves of American war dead in the National Memorial Cemetery in Hawaii.   Our Defense Department explained that this removal of Christian symbols was "a trend of the times."

                            *       *       *       *       *


The Jews' bloodless revolution is imminent.   They are about to do away with our nation and our Faith.   And yet, to stay the onslaught, we need only alerted American Catholics, re-determined to convert their country to the cause of Christ the King.    Who, in patient majesty, is waiting in the tabernacles of Catholic Churches all across our land.


Watch our Videos:

Saturday, February 21, 2015

"Priest" Falls Into Grave While Leading Funeral. Saturday 21st February, 2015. First Saturday in Lent.

"Priest" Falls Into Grave While Leading Funeral - Brother Peter Dimond ( 



"This is Brother Peter Dimond ( - this is an interesting story.


A "priest" of the Vatican II sect in Brazil was leading a funeral service for one of his"parishioners" when the ground suddenly gave way, he and three others at the funeral service actually fell into the ditch!



This is incredible when we consider the words of  Jesus Christ in the Gospel.    He says, "Can a blind man lead a blind man?   Will they not both fall into the ditch?" - Luke 6:39. 


Blind leading the Blind - Matthew 15:13-14

Matthew 15: 13-14, also says, "Every plant, which my heavenly Father has not planted, shall be rooted up.   Let them alone: they are blind, and leaders of the blind.   And if the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch."



In our view, it's not just an accident that this happened.   It's a perfect symbol of what a "priest" or leader in the Vatican II sect represents.   He is blind and he leads the blind into the ditch.     Consider that this did not happen at some random secular event, but at the person's funeral service.    



Therefore, with the Vatican II "priest" presiding, it happened at the very event that signifies where the "parishioner" will end up for all eternity, whether the person who has left this world will be saved or fall into the eternal ditch of Hell and be lost.



And, sadly, the people who are adhering to the Vatican II religion, believing in the new teachings of Vatican II, following its heretical leaders, attending the New Mass etc., are adhering to a false religion.     They're not adhering to the true Catholic faith which is necessary for salvation.     They're heading for the eternal ditch of Hell, and the blind guides in the Vatican II Counter Church lead them there, through their heresies, apostasies, their religious indifferentism, their failure to denounce immorality and sinful behavior etc.,


Heretical, Apostate - Antipope Francis


In the Vatican II sect, the blind lead the blind right into the ditch.   It is also note worthy that besides the person who had died and was also literally in the ditch, three others who were also at the service also fell into the ditch with the "priest."


New Mass - Abomination of Desolation


That signifies in our view, that not only the deceased adherents of the new Vatican belief system and religion sadly fallen into the eternal ditch of Hell, but others who are still living are being led there right now.


Immoral Vatican II followers being led to Hell


As the material on our website covers, the New Mass is not Catholic and must be avoided.     The Vatican II sect is not the Catholic Church.    It's a matter of salvation for people to realize it."


Vatican II Church is not Catholic


Watch the Video:


News Item

Stokes Valley Survey in progress on Climate Change  - watch this space for results, hopefully tomorrow Tuesday 24th February, 2015  [37 participants so far by this evening - not enough, so will continue on tomorrow regardless!]

Sunday, February 15, 2015

SOME NEEDED INFORMATION ABOUT THE JEWS. Sunday 15th February, 2015. Quinquagesima Sunday. Sts. Faustina and Jovita, Mm

SOME NEEDED INFORMATION ABOUT THE JEWS - The Point August, 1955  Edited under Fr. Leonard Feeney MICM



  By some happy providence of our seldom musical English language, there is an immediately detectable harmony in the words,  "the Jews" and "the news."    For many years now this accidental rhyme has become an increasingly faithful reflection of a more and more solid alliance.   For the Jews now have unquestioned control over the American public's chief source of ideas - the news in the daily paper.

They have arrived at this control by a variety of means - shrewdly avoiding exploitation of any one.   While it is true that they own and operate the most important single newspaper in the country, The New York Times, the day-to-day bible of American journalism - while it is true that they have so bought-out the newspapers in our nation's capital that it is impossible for a congressman to pick up a Washington morning paper that is not published by a Jew - and while it is true that from Philadelphia to Los Angeles they are continuing to gain ownership of many of the big dailies, - still, outright editor-and-publisher control is not always necessary, or even prudent, for promoting the interests of the Jews.

The professional Jewish pressure groups in every large community have long become artists at suavely intimidating any too-emphatically-Gentile city editor.    And even more persuasive are the "Main Street Jews"- the department, clothing, and speciality store owners who brandish the big stick of advertising revenue.    It stands to reason that the unwary editor who tells the truth about the Jews will ultimately find himself excluded from the fabulous money hand-outs of the Jewish retail advertisers.   Few papers can survive a boycott like this.

For those smaller American cities where there are still advertisement-buying Main Street businesses which are not in the hands of the Jews, and where the scant Jewish community is much less eloquent, the American Jewish Committee has come up with a special, necessarily more direct plan. The newspapers in these places can be controlled on their policy pages, the editorial ones, by direct pipeline from the American Jewish Committee offices in New York.   The Committee boasts (to its own members, not the general public) that it regularly provides 1700 small American newspapers with what it calls, "canned editorials."    These are ready-to-print commentaries on public issues which embody the complete Jewish line, but which come as a God-send to the unsuspecting and overworked small town editor, who is told that he should insert them in his paper as his own editorials - no acknowledgements wanted by his well-wishing friends on the American Jewish Committee.

Apart from the individual publications, there are those great fountainheads of information, the news-gathering agencies.   The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia boasts that Jews were "pioneers" in the  formation of these agencies.   In the field of international news exchange, the most illustrious name has been the Jewish name of Paul Reuter, founder of the famous Reuters agency.    Within our own country, the United Press has a long record of collaboration with all the Jewish lobbyists, the Associated Press has gone so far as to guarantee to the Jewish American Defamation League that there will never be an AP release  in which a Jewish wrong-doer is identified as a Jew, and the International News Service has faithfully followed the aggressive pro-Jewish policies of its late Jewish president, Moses Koenigsberg - one time head of another far-flung news empire, King Features Syndicate.   In addition, all UP, AP, and INS dispatches are subject to the constant scrutiny of the news systems of American radio-television, whose three greatest broadcasting chains (CBS, NBC, and ABC) are, respectively, in the Jewish hands of William Paley, David Sarnoff, and Barney Balaban.

Add to  these multiple opportunities for control the names of such prominent Jewish news-people as Joseph Pulitzer, Adolph Ochs, Paul Block, Herbert Bayard Swope, David Lawrence, Arthur Hayes Sulzberger, Franklin P. Adams, Walter Lippman, Julius Ochs Adler, Eugene Lyons, J. David Stern, George Sokolsky, Walter Winchell, etc., and you can glean some small realization of the extent to which "the Jews" and "the news" are now so thoroughly entangled.


"By their fruits you shall know them" - and American newspapers can be no better known than by that very latest of their fruits, that gigantic laboratory lemon, Jonas Salk.

Jewish Jonas is a symbol of all that the Jew-controlled press can do for a man.   It can build him up overnight as the nation's number one hero.   It can make what he has to offer (in Jonas' case a serum of infected monkey kidneys) the most appealing and necessary item in the land.

And when the artificial alliance (Salk, the kidneys, and the clamouring public) begins to back-fire, the versatile press can save its face (and Jonas') by suggesting innumerable culprits.  "Salt Not at Fault," say the headlines.   And down below we can read all about the negligence of Mrs. Hobby, the miscalculations of Dr. Scheele, the slovenliness of the Cutter firm.

Here in Boston, the press has had a notably tough time of it trying to perpetuate the aura of greatness with which it initially surrounded Doctor Salk.   As we write the city health commissioner has announced that until last month (when the first Salk injections were given in this area) Boston's record for the whole year was only six cases of polio.   In the past month (since the injections) that total of six has risen to one hundred and sixty.

What deference have we?   Saint Alphonsus Maria de Ligouri, founder of the Redemptorist Order, long ago announced a foolproof solution - a permanent immunization against all future Doctor Salks.   In his book, Theologia Moralis, Saint Alphonsus states that Catholics are obliged to avoid all Jewish doctors and their remedies, adding that to give oneself over to their care is to commit "a mortal sin."


The very choicest fruit of our "free press" is not, however, the Jew whom it builds up, but the Gentile whom it takes in.    Hopeful of rescuing one such, we are directing the following sentences to the Honorable Wayne Morse, the Jew-championing solon from Oregon who recently remarked,  "I am amazed at the number of my colleagues who in private meetings closed to the press, and in cloakroom sessions that go unreported, fight viciously to refuse aid and haven to millions of human beings because they are Jews."

It is inconceivable to you, Senator Morse, how anyone could take exception to your Jewish friends - friends who expect of a Senator certain attentions, but who amply repay him for these by lauding him in their newspapers, on their radio, and over their television, and when the chips are down, by coming right into his home state to stump for his re-election.

Now, Senator, to clarify for you this mystery of anti-Semitism in your midst, we must point out that your friends are not opposed simply "because they are Jews," in the way that Republicans might be opposed simply because they are Republicans.   Your friends provoke animosities for reasons that are not only numerous but are thoroughly substantial, ranging from personal grievances to international ones.

The sore point which is particularly suited for arousing members of Congress, however, and which probably accounts for most of the cloak room confabs you have been so startled by, is the Jews' sustained, intensive campaign of promoting Communism.

The Jew-Communist tie-up is, of course, no longer as blatantly asserted as it was in 1917 - when New York newspapers announced the Russian revolution with front page headlines proclaiming,  "East Side Jews Go Wild With Joy,"  when Rabbi Stephen Wise hailed the Revolution, at a huge Carnegie Hall rally, as the "noblest accomplishment of the sons and daughters of Israel," and when Jewish financier Jacob Schiff boasted of the millions of dollars he had contributed as a propaganda fund for the insurrectionists.

Still, legislators today have evidence quite as cogent as the above for knowing that Communism is a Jewish movement.   Perhaps you have observed yourself, Senator, that whenever the government indicts a number of Communists, 90 percent of them turn out to be your friends?    For instance, of the eleven Communists who have been convicted of espionage since World War II, ten have been Jews.    Or, to take the latest case, of the nine Communists recently convicted in Philadelphia (not of espionage, but just of being Communists), eight were Jews.     And only last month, when the names of 23 Communist who had infiltrated the newspaper industry were disclosed, 20 turned out to be - do you see what we mean, Senator?

We hope we have given you an inkling of why it is that many of your colleagues have a slant on your Jewish friends slightly different from your own.    At the very least, such an inkling would serve to keep you unamazed as you wander through the halls of Congress.   At best, it could lead you into an entirely new way of thinking.    Spurred on by your patriotic zeal, you might conclude that, despite all they have done for you, it is not to the higher interests of the country to hand it over to the Jews.

Perhaps, Senator, in a few months, you might even provide a new voice in the cloak rooms.


For a long time now we have known the apprehensive Jews of America are working night and day to try to alter those basic doctrines which Catholics are taught about Jews - namely, that the Jews are the crucifiers of Christ, the victims of a divine curse, and, as Our Lord insisted, the children of the Devil.

We have seen how the American Jewish Committee has openly launched a program to censor such teachings in American parochial schools, stating that one of the chief A.J.C. objectives is "changing what is said about Jews and Judaism in the literature of Christian education."

Invariably the Jewish attack on what Catholic children are taught ends up in an attack upon that foundational rock of catholic belief - the New Testament.     Recent example:  The Jewish Freemasons of California, in their publication, the B'nai B'rith Messenger, have lately published an open letter to Cardinal Spellman.   The subject of the letter is the Catholic monthly, The Point, which gets branded in the letter as a "vicious anti-Semitic sheet."    The Jewish complaint winds up with the following paragraph:

"Here we are faced with an acknowledged Catholic publication that appeals to violent action against Jews, telling its readers that, 'The Jews, who both killed the Lord Jesus and the prophets, and have persecuted us, and please not God, and are adversaries to all men, prohibiting us to speak to the Gentiles that they may be saved.'      There is no greater authority in American Catholicism than Cardinal Spellman.  We therefore appeal to him to put a stop to this outrage."

The Jewish Masons of B'nai B'rith fail to mention that the passage which they reprint from The Point ("The Jews who both killed the Lord Jesus, etc.") is not of The Point's invention.   It is a direct quotation from Saint Paul's First Epistle to the Thessalonians - an integral part of the inspired New Testament!


Lest anyone think, however, that this Jewish failure to attack Saint Paul by name might indicate good will toward the New Testament, the Jews of the B'nai B'rith Messenger followed up their complaint to Cardinal Spellman with a boldtype editorial calling for a revision of the Christian Bible!    The Messenger summarized  "There must be a rewriting of the Christ story for Christians which will for all time eradicate the myth that 'the Jews killed Christ.' "



It will very much disturb the Jewish Masons of B'nai B'rith to learn that every year on Good Friday, in the fifth responsory of Matins, a Catholic  priest reads in his Breviary,  "The Jews crucified Jesus; and there was darkness ... "

Realizing full well that this is hardly the amount of attention that the subject deserves, Our Holy Mother Church requires that every priest also read, during the same Office of Good Friday, an instruction by that eminent Catholic authority, saint Augustine of Hippo.

The Point concludes this month with Saint Augustine's lengthy answer to the question "Did the Jews Crucify Jesus?"

"Ye know what secret counsel was that of the wicked Jews, and what instruction was that of the workers of iniquity.   Of what iniquity were they the workers?   The murder of Our Lord, Jesus Christ.   'Many good works,'  saith He, 'have I showed you - for which of those works go ye about to kill me?'   He had borne with all their weaknesses;  He had healed all their diseases; He had preached unto them the kingdom of Heaven; He had discovered to them their iniquities, that they might rather hate them, than the Physician that came to cure them.   And now at last, without gratitude for all the tenderness of His healing love, like men raging in a high delirium, throwing themselves madly on the Physician Who had come to cure them, they took counsel how they might kill Him.

"The Jews cannot say, 'We did not murder Christ' - albeit they gave Him over to Pilate, His judge, that they themselves might seem free of His death.   They could throw the blame of their sin upon a human judge, but did they deceive God, the Great Judge?   In that which Pilate did he was their accomplice, but in comparison with them, he had far lesser sin. (John XIX, 11) Pilate strove as far as he could to deliver Him forth out of their hands, for which reason also he scourged Him. and brought Him forth to them.   He scourged not the Lord for cruelty's sake, but in the hope that he might so slake the Jews' wild thirst for blood, that, perchance, even they might be touched with compassion, and cease to lust for His death, when they saw what He was after the flagellation.

"Even this effort he made, ' ye know how that 'he took water, and washed his hands before the multitude, saying: I am innocent of the Blood of this Just Person.'    And yet, 'he delivered Him to be crucified!'   But if he were guilty who did it against his will, were they innocent who goaded him on to it?  No.   Pilate gave sentence against Him, and commanded Him to be crucified, but ye, O ye Jews, ye also are His murderers!  Wherewith?  With your tongue, whetted like a sword.  And when?   when ye cried, 'Crucify Him! Crucify Him!' "

(From the Roman Breviary)


Watch the video:   Infowars declares War on Vaccines!