Is the World about to End? - Part 5. Thursday, 22 April, 2010 - Feast of Sts. Soter and Caius, Pp Mm

Is the World about to End? - Part 5

Are we living through the Apocalypse? by Brother Peter Dimond of the Most Holy Family Monastery ?
( www.vaticancatholic.com

)

A continuing series of transcriptions from the video on the Apocalypse by Bro. Peter Dimond.

_____________________________________

Bro. Peter Dimond,

"Now I want to go to Apocalypse 13, because we need to talk not only about the beast, as the Empire, but there's actually a critically important aspect of this we haven't discussed yet, and a few of these points are discussed in our video "The Great Apostasy and the Antichrist", which is on YouTube, and we recommend that people watch that in addition to watching this.

But, I am going to be talking about that now.

So, in Apocalypse 13, we learn more specifics about the beast out of the sea, and we've shown the evidence why it's the EU.

It fits with the beast that was, and is not, and yet shall come up. It fits with the ten horns having the reach and extent of the Roman Empire. It fits that it came out of the sea. It fits with the fact that it came into existence during the reign of the sixth king, and it's going to fit even more precisely with the things we are going to cover.

Now, in Apocalypse 13:1, and the following, it tells us that, " And the beast which I saw, was like to a leopard and its feet were the feet of a bear, and his mouth as the mouth of a lion. And the dragon gave him his own strength and great power. And I saw one of his heads as it were slain to death: and his death's wound was healed. And all the earth was in admiration after the beast."

Well, the heads are kings over the city of seven hills.

So, one of those kings is wounded and recovers, and all the earth is in admiration after the beast.

John Paul II, on May 13, 1981, was shot in an assassinaton attempt. He recovered, and we must remember how amazing it was that John Paul II did not die on May 13, 1981.

He was shot multiple times by Ali Agca, a professional assassin.

He was hit at least twice, some reports say he was struck three times. He lost three quarters of his blood.

The doctors said he was something like a centimetre from a critical artery, and even Agca, the person who shot him,who later repented, and this was part of the deception, we are going to discuss - was a professional assassin, and when he met John Paul II, asked him how he had survived.

So, it was clearly a deadly wounding, and he recovered, and everyone was in admiration after him, thinking he was "Mary's Pope", because it occurred on May 13, 1981, the day of Our Lady's first appearance at Fatima in 1917.

That is also extremely significant. It lends even more support to the argument that this was an event tied in with the Great Deception, because Fatima is such a crucial matter.


In analyzing all of these events, it also ties in to how Fatima was turned on its head, and the true message was hidden, while a completely false version of the truth was spread.


Following the shooting of John Paul II, in 1981, there were all kinds of false apparitions reporting that God and Our Lady say that he's a 'chosen pope', that he's the hero of the Church.


People believed that the Devil's main attack, that Communist main attack, was against him. That's why he was targeted.


And, in fact, when the Vatican finally released its false message of the third secret of Fatima, their interpretation was that John Paul II is really the hero of the secret.


Complete nonsense!


And all of this was facilitated by his wounding and his recovery - and all the earth was in admiration after him.


Now, what's additionally important, is that we see in this verse, that not only is the beast, the empire that comes out of the sea, but also, this head that is wounded, is the beast.

For, it says that one of the heads of the beast was wounded and recovered, yet all the earth was in admiration after the beast.

So, the head of the beast is identitfies as the beast - and this actually makes sense, when you think about.

If the head is part of the beast, then that which happens to the head, necessarily happens to the beast, when the beast is in existence; and the beast is in existence during the reign of king six and seven, and therefore, that which is said of king six and seven, is truly said of the beast.

The beast is therefore manifested by the heads in addition to the empire.

So when something is being described about what the beast does, it could refer to the empire, and it could refer to the emperor or the king reigning at the time, but both are truly said to be done by the beast.

Another point we are going to be covering a little later on, is that even though that which is done by the head or the king, is necessarily done by the beast, because the king belongs to the beast.

That whch is done by the empire itself, is done by the beast, but is not necessarily done by the head or the king.
Now, what also makes sense, for instance. If you kick something with your foot,you are kicking something, but your hand isn't necessarily striking anything.
And so, that which is done by your foot, is done by you, but that which is done by your foot is not necessarily done by your hand.
So the fact that the beast is manifested not only in the empire, but also in the king reigning, when the empire is in existence, is proven in this verse and in a verse we are going to look at later, Apocalypse 13;14.

And that's an important point to understand.
So, St. John sometimes speaks of the beast in view of the empire, and sometimes he speaks of it in view of the emperor ruling the seven hilled city, the king at the time of the beast.

And, that's what John Paul II was, and we have to remember that it says the seven hilled city is riding on top of the beast.

And, so, John Paul II, was the king of the seven hilled city,that is riding on top of the beast, and that makes John Paul II the beast as well. And this, of course fits with what we've pointed out for years, that he taught that every man is Jesus Christ, he claimed to be Jesus Christ by doing so.

His first homily, he claimed that 'man is the Christ,' in Matthew 16.

He preached that 'man is Christ' in ways that are so amazing it's truly astounding; he denied basically every dogma of the faith, and we will cover more of that.

So, he is a prideful, beastly figure who sat in the temple of God.

Now, continuing in Apocalypse 13, it says. " And there was given to him a mouth speaking great things and blasphemies ... and he opened his mouth unto blasphemies against God, to blaspheme his name and His tabernacles and them that dwell in heaven..." That fits exactly with John Paul II...."and power was given him over every tribe and people and nations and tongues."

The Council of Trent actually understood the verse to refer to the nations of the Church; and so , the harlot, the Roman harlot which is deceiving people, the false Vatican II sect, has authority, it assumes some kind of influence over the different nations of the Catholic Church, who are looking to Rome, thinking that there is a true pope reigning, but there is not!

And so, the fact that this head of the beast was given authority over peoples, nations and tongues, fits again, precisely.

Now, before I proceed, I want to quote something from John Paul II's first encyclical, Redemptor Hominis.

This was his very first encyclical, and this encyclical is filled with diabolical symbolism and absolutely heretical statements.

He defines Christianity, not as the Gospel of Jesus Christ, but "the Good News of Man"! And, the "deep amazement at man"!

And so, we have man in the place of God, a new Gospel about man!

That is the mark of Antichrist, according to Pope Pius X.
But, in the first paragraph of his very first encyclical, he says this, "the universal service connected with the chair of St. Peter in Rome, is already very close to the year 2000 . At this moment, it is difficult to say what MARK that year will LEAVE ON THE FACE of human history or what it WILL BRING TO EACH PEOPLE, NATION, COUNTRY AND CONTINENT ..." John Paul II, Redemptor Hominis. # 1

..."in spite of the efforts already being made to foresee some events."

He's quoting Apocalypse 13 here - he doesn't tell you that, but he is making reference to the MARK of the beast, in a cryptic way!

He's not telling you that's what he's talking about, but look at the language. He says - speaking of the year 2000 A.D., or just before it, or what will come in the year 2000 A. D. - " At this moment..." These words are directly from the chapter we are quoting from, Apocalypse 13.

It speaks of a Mark on the forehead - we are going to discuss that -and it speaks of power over peoples, nations, countries etc., he's quoting it, he's saying it's a spiritual kind of mark, that will come in the year 2000 A.D.

Why is he talking about this without telling you what he is talking about?


It's because you are dealing with the Antichrist, with John Paul II.

That's what he was, and he is saying things like that because he is revealing some of the truth, but not telling you what he's actually talking about - but we will cover more of this ...

FOR THOSE WHO ARE FOLLOWING THIS ON THE VIDEO!

Is the World about to End? - Part 4. Saturday, 17, April, 2010. Our Lady's Saturday, St. Anicetus, PM

Is the World about to End ? - Part 4

Are we living through the Apocalypse? by Brother Peter Dimond of the Most Holy Family Monastery.

( http://www.vaticancatholic.com/ )

A continuing series of transcriptions from the videos on the Apocalypse by Bro. Peter Dimond:

________________________________________

Bro. Peter Dimond,

"Now, before we move into that and Apocalypse 13, I want discuss some more features of this beast, which really makes a lot of sense. I want talk about the ten horns.

We already discussed how the ten horns come from Daniel, and Daniel identified the ten horns as the expanse, the territory of the Roman Empire, ten horns.

And, the EU has those horns, because it basically covers, more or less, of the same area, an empire on the Mediterranean.

Now, Apocalypse 17, tells us more about the ten horns. Apocalypse 17:11-12, "And, the beast that was, is not, the same also is the eighth and is of the seven and goeth into destruction." "And the ten horns, which thoue sawest, are the ten kings, who have not yet received a kingdom, but shall receive power as kings one hour with the beast." Apocalypse 17:13.

These ( referring to the ten horns, who are ten kings), "have one design, and their strength and power they shall deliver to the beast."

The ten horns are basically the territories, the nations of the European area. They were the nations aligned with the Roman Empire, the peoples who were part of it. It's referring here to the different member states of the EU.

They receive a kingdom one hour with the beast.

As soon as the EU comes in to existence, the member states gain a kind of kingdom with the union.

However, it says that "these ten kings or horns have one design, and their strength and power they deliver to the beast." That fits precisely with the EU, because with the member states, their kingship is nominal. It's really a name. They are at the mercy of the EU.

They deliver all their power to the EU, which determines its monetary policy for everyone. It determines their laws and how things are to be done in all those states. So their power is really negligible without the approval of the EU, the beast.

All of their sovereignty is given to the beast.

And, it goes on in verse 16, "And the ten horns...."

There are lots of things that are interesting in this. It says, "the ten horns hate the harlot" and "shall make her desolate and naked..."

Well, normally this wouldn't appear to make sense, because the image we are given, we have the beast with seven heads and ten horns, and it says that the harlot is "riding on top of the beast." Apocalypse 17.

The harlot is on top of the beast, and the horns are part of the beast, so normally you would think the horns would be one with the harlot, that the horns would not be at variance with with the harlot.

But, this tells us, that the ten horns hate the harlot ... that fits exactly with the EU.

Member states hate the Vatican II church, the Roman harlot.

We covered this in our other material, "Why Rome is now the Whore of Babylon." - see our DVD on that

The Vatican II apostate church is the great harlot, not the Catholic Church. The Catholic Church is the true Church, but the Vatican II church, which has apostasized from Christ, is the great harlot.

And so, the member states of the EU hate her, they try to expose her sex scandal, they sue her, they try to divest her of all her property, they try to make her desolate and naked, and they try to mock her in their media outlets.

They hate the harlot, because even though it's an apostate sect, even by having the name of the Catholic Church, it stands as a conviction to their Godlessness and their liberalism.

So, they want to destroy and remove and expurgate any vestiges of Catholicism from the earth. And, this is God's way of punishing the harlot, for it says. "for God hath given it unto their hearts to do that which pleaseth Him." Apocalypse 17:17-18

And so, with the reality we are seeing, how Europe hates the harlot, right now we are seeing it in the news, all over the place.

They cannot expose the Vatican II sect, and it's sex scandal enough. They try to make it look as bad as possible. And, by their Godlessness, by their promotion of homosexuality, and gay "marriage" and homosexual unions, they make the churches which are allied with the harlot, even more liberal and lifeless and desolate.

Now, something else which is extremely interesting, is the fact that Europa, that name for Europe, comes from Greek mythology.

Europa, in Greek mythology, was a woman who was abducted by Zeus, and the way that Europa is depicted, in Greek mythology is a woman riding on a beast.

Here is a picture of Europa, the name from which we get Europe.

And, the image here here, Europa, is signified by a woman riding on a beast.

In the Apocalypse, here's what St. John says, Apocalypse 17:3, " And I saw a woman sitting upon a scarlet beast ..."

So, St. John sees a woman on a beast.

We are clearly showing the evidence that the EU is the beast out of the sea.

Europa, the name comes from Greek mythology, where the woman is pictured riding a beast, and in fact, the EU uses this symbol.

Here is a picture of the official stamp of 2nd Election European Parliament of the EU.

We see a woman riding on a beast, and what is more incredible, we see the seven hills, exactly as is described in the Apocalypse.

We also see a fish here, indicating some kind of water.

In Apocalypse 17, it says that the great harlot sits upon many waters ... the symbolism is stunning, so specific and there's even more.

Here is a sculpture outside the EU parliamnent building in Brussels, Belgium.

We see the same image, a beast with a woman riding on it, Europa, the same image St. John describes. It is used repeatedly by the EU.

Is St. John giving us an indication that the beast has to do with Europe?

I believe so.

In fact, here's a 1563 depiction of the Tower of Babel, a famous one by a Flemish painter.

The Tower of Babel comes from Genesis 11, in which we read the people tried to build a tower to reach heaven. They tried to become one without God, and God confounded them, separated them, and this Tower of Babel was representative of the evil goal of man trying to have union without God's truth and trying to achieve utopia and heaven on earth without God.

Well, here's a picture of the EU parliament building in Strasbourg, France. It was designed to look like the tower of Babel.

Look at the anazing similarities. It even has the unfinished look, like it's still being built. This is how the tower of Babel is depicted. It represents the new tower of Babel, the new union without God, the new world empire, the European Empire without God.

This is really stunning!

Additionally, also there is a poster which was released by the EU, in which we see the tower of Babel depicted, and we read: "Europe, many tongues one voice," signifying this wicked antichrist union without God.

And we see the people drawn as block figures building the tower.

Then we see inverted pentagrams above the tower, which is a satanic symbol.

This is on a poster which represented the EU.

And, so what's amazing is that the EU's official constitution did not mention God or Christianity, even once!

That is astounding, when you consider how Catholic Europe was inexplicably bound up with the faith . . . . . . .

No mention of God or Jesus Christ at all. Even our own American Constitution, written by Freemasons mentions God!

- continued in part 5

 

 

Is the World about to End? - Part 3. Friday 16, April, 2010. Ferial Day.

Is the World about to End ? - Part 3

Are we living through the Apocalypse? by Brother Peter Dimond of the Most Holy Family Monastery.

( www.vaticancatholic.com )

Continuing transcription from the video by Bro. Peter Dimond on the Apocalypse:

_________________________________

Bro. Peter Dimond,

"Now, when did the EU come into existence?

It came into existence in 1993, with the Maastrich Treaty. Keep that in mind, because it fits exactly with the next point I am going to make.

The beast that came up out of the sea, not only has ten horns, it not only has the expanse or reach of the Roman Empire, but it also has seven heads. ( Apocalypse 13:1. ) The Roman Empire described by Daniel, did not have those seven horns.

The reason is, because the seven heads have a particular application to the final days and the beast which comes up out of the sea, a revived Roman Empire, the EU.

Now, what are the seven heads?

In Apocalypse, chapter 17, what they are is described in Apocalypse 17:9. " And here is the understanding ..." So we learn that the seven heads are the seven mountains, and the seven mountains, most commentators understand, are Rome.

The evidence is overwhelming, because it says that Babylon sits upon those seven mountains, and St. Peter, writing from Rome, 1 Peter 5:13, says cryptically that it's Babylon.

So, Apocalypse 17:9, says the seven heads are mountains, meaning Rome. And, they are also seven kings. There's duality there.

So it's telling you this beast has seven heads, that have to do with Rome and seven kings.

Now, what are these seven kings? these seven kings, we are told, are affiliated with seven mountains. Now, a king is a ruler.

In 1929, the Vatican became a sovereign state. It became the Vatican City State, with the Lateran Treaty in 1929. So, starting in 1929, the popes not only were heads of the Catholic Church, for example, Pope Pius XI, who was pope in 1929.

He not only was head of the Catholic Church, spiritual ruler of the Church, but he had temporal authority as king of the Vatican City State.

Now, what's so interesting about this, that prior to 1929, popes had no temporal authority. It's true that back in history, popes would rule over what were called the Papal States, and so popes who ruled over the Papal States, could have said to have been kings as well.

However, in 1870, Italy declared war on the Papal States, and captured Rome. And this occurred on September 20, 1870, and Rome was annexed to the kingdom of Italy, and the Papal States fell in 1870.

So, from 1870 until 1929, the popes had no temporal authority. They were not kings in the temporal sense at all.

And so, with the Lateran Treaty, and the creation of the Vatican City State, the popes began a fresh start as kings.

In fact, the Lateran Treaty of 1929, which brought the Vatican City State into existence, spoke of it, as "a new creation, not as a continuation of the previous Papal States." So it is absolutely true that the kingship that the popes received with the Lateran Treaty, and the Vatican City State, starting in 1929, was an entirely new kingship, which they had never before received in history.

It was unique, and we mentioned they had no kingship at all for about sixty years prior to 1929. So, it was clearly a signal of something new. A new kingship within the city of seven hills.

Now, if Pope Pius XI, is the first king, and Pope Pius XII is the second king, and John XXIII is the third king, and Paul VI is the fourth king, and John Paul I is the fifth king, and John Paul II is the sixth king ,and Benedict XVI is the seventh king, and the EU is the beast out of the sea, whose heads are, on some levels these kings, then we should get some indication that the EU, which I'm saying is the beast out of the sea, came into existence during the reign of the sixth king, because it was created in 1993, during the reign of the sixth king.

Well, in Apocalypse 17:9-10, we are given that very indication. "And here is the understanding that hath wisdom ..."

St. John writes, that the angel told him, the beast would come in to existence during the reign of the sixth king, when five of the kings are fallen, and we know he is telling us that the beast will come into existence, after five are fallen, because it says in Apocalypse 17:8 and following, "The beast which thou sawest, WAS, and is NOT, and shall come up out of the bottomless pit ... they are seven kings: FIVE ARE FALLEN, one is ..."

So, he's taking you to the point in time, right before the beast comes into existence. That means the beast comes into existence during the reign of the sixth king, when five are fallen. Which fits in with the EU, which came into existence in 1993, during the Maastrich Treaty, which put it into effect, during the reign of John Paul II, the sixth king.

There is much more. It goes on to say, "Five are fallen, one is, and the other is not yet come: and when he is come, (that's the seventh king, Benedict XVI,) he must remain a short time."

So, if this is correct, it is saying, the seventh king will remain a short time, compared to perhaps a much longer reign of the sixth king. ( John Paul II, the sixth king, reigned for more than 26 years - ( 1978 - 2005 )

And, it goes on to say, "And the beast which was, and is not, the same also is the eighth, and is of the seven, and goeth into destruction."

It's referring to again to the Roman Empire, the beast which Daniel saw, which persecuted the Church, killed the saints, killed the Catholics, the beast which was, and is not, because again he's transported to the point in time right before the EU comes into existence.

So it is not. The Roman Empire is not any more, either. The same also is the eighth and is of the seven, and goeth into destruction. The Roman Empire, he is telling you, is coming back into a new form. It's a new kind of Roman empire. It's not exactly the same, but it has many of the same features as we will see.

It's a new kind of Roman Empire, a new kind of pagan empire, which persecutes the churches in a different kind of way. It is Godless, is antichrist.

And, it says, " the same also is the eighth, and is of the seven and goeth into destruction."

Now, what does that mean?

It tells you that the seven kings, are affiliated with the seven mountains, Rome.

The Lateran Treaty gave the popes and the post Vatican II antipopes a temporal kingship, so they are the seven kings.

But, it says, the beast is the eighth, but is of the seven.

The beast, the EU, is the eighth king of Rome, because the Vatican City State is ultimately at the mercy of the larger EU, and the surrounding powers.

And so, even though they have a kingship, to speak of, in reality, the EU is the king of all the member states, and the Vatican's kingdom rests within Italy, which is part of the EU. And, the EU determines the laws for the member states, it determines fiscal and economic policy for the members of its Euro zone.

And, so even though the Vatican isn't part of the EU, it is at the mercy of it. In fact, the Vatican is part of the Euro zone, the EU's economic union,and therefore the EU determines how much money the Vatican can issue.

And so, the EU, the beast itself, is in fact the eighth king.

But, there is much more, not only to say abut the beast, which is the new kind of Roman Empire, the EU, but, also the individuals ruling Rome, at the time of the existence of the beast, the sixth and seventh kings, because the beast is not only manifested in the empire, but also in the emperor figure as we will see ...