Why I Now Believe the New Zealand Event Was a Complete Hoax With Zero Dead - Kurt R. Haskell News & Opinion Blog. 21 March, 2019
I've spent a considerable amount of time thinking about the New Zealand event. I've watched the video of the shooting many, many times and second by second in many spots. I've thought about why it's being treated as a censorship and gun grab tool. I've wondered why the manifesto and its contents were put out there. I've thought about all of the ramifications of each detail. Now I'm going to explain why I think the entire event was nothing but a theatrical production where ABSOLUTELY NOBODY was killed or injured. It has taken me several days to finally draw this logical conclusion. Now I'm going to tell you exactly why. Feel free to agree or disagree.
I'm going to specifically reference different parts of the shooting video. Once again, here is the video for you to follow along:
https://up.ey.md/f.php?h=2XN6P_7t
3:05 to 4:20 While driving to the Mosque Brenton Tarrant inexplicably pulls off to the side of the road and waits. He's not doing anything in the car here. You can see his right hand on the steering wheel for most of the time. As a person in red gets within view of his car, Tarrant makes a quick signal to the person with his right hand. This is a, "I'm your guy and I see you" signal. Just as the person in red walks past Tarrant's car, Tarrant continues driving to the Mosque. The person in red is making sure Tarrant is there and giving Tarrant the signal to start the event. We've seen this sort of thing before. Remember the Ft. Lauderdale airport event from 2017? Well, in that event there which took place in January, there was a man dressed in all green with a white beard that looked like Santa Claus. As each person ran up to this man, they took a left. He was the signal to run left.
4:57 to 5:05 While continuing the drive to the mosque, Tarrant is again looking for someone dressed in red as an indicator of where to turn. However, the street is lined with cars obstructing his view. As Tarrant is almost past the turn into the mosque, he sees the second person dressed in red. Tarrant slams on the brakes and makes a quick left turn. However, because he saw the second man in red so late, he partially drove past the turn. Tarrant then had to reverse his car backward before continuing into the mosque because he saw the man so late and partially missed the turn.
5:50 to 6:00 Tarrant gets a bit confused looking for where he is supposed to park. He knows it's at the end of an alley facing onto a main road with a red car parked directly across the street. It takes him a few seconds to locate the red car but he manages just fine.
6:20 to 6:26 Tarrant gets out of his car with a large rifle. He turns right and begins walking on a sidewalk to the mosque. Two people are directly in front of him next to a red car and look right at him. Neither person is alarmed or afraid that Tarrant is carrying a gun. We can rule out the possibility that Tarrant wasn't carrying the gun here as you can see the gun barrel in several frames. Thus, the lack of reaction by these two people tell me they are in on the event. When Tarrant reaches the two people by the red car, he takes a right into the mosque courtyard. Note that we have now had FOUR red markers.
6:35 to 6:42 Tarrant starts firing inside the mosque courtyard. Note the casing from his eighth shot hits one wall and ricochets into another wall. This tells us these casings are likely not digitally added but are real casings. Two men can be seen standing in the doorway when Tarrant begins firing. One falls in the doorway and the other crawls inside. The scene inside the doorway isn't clear. I think there may have been an edit here where Tarrant fired a real gun in one video and the scene was combined with the men standing in the doorway falling. I'm not sure but something strange is going on here.
6:44 Note that there are no visible wounds on the man laying in the doorway.
6:47 A woman's voice screams out in agony but no women have yet been shot. An audio soundtrack has been edited into this video. Thus, it's not a live video.
6:50 Note that there is a man with a gray shirt laying in the doorway to the right. In addition, note that the door is fully open and the man's right arm is approximately one foot from the door. He appears dead. Further note that people are fleeing this room out the back door.
6:52 to 6:53 As Tarrant walks down the hall, a magazine for his gun can be seen on the floor to the left. Tarant will pick up this magazine from this exact location at 8:32. This is the exact staging area where Tarrant later reloads. Thus, it appears this scene had multiple takes with a magazine being mistakenly left from a prior scene.
6:52 to 6:53 During this same time period, a man in blue runs across the doorway at the end of the hall and appears to be shot by Tarrant. PLEASE NOTE THE PSYCHOLOGICAL TRICKERY TAKING PLACE HERE! You just saw that this is a real person in blue. Later you'll see him get shot in the head. What you can't wrap your mind around, however, is that between these two scenes, the man in blue is switched out for a mass casualty dummy with a blood pack. Tarrant is shooting something here but most likely blanks or some kind of special effects gun so that nobody gets injured.
6:57 Tarrant reaches the end of the hall and is now firing into the large room. He fires straight ahead and left, but only up to a 45 degree angle. His shots won't be able to hit anyone farther left than 45 degrees because he didn't turn far enough left.
6:57 to 6:58 Tarrant turns to fire right. Although Tarrant has been firing his weapon for 23 seconds now, including several shots within this room, nobody on the right side of the room has reacted or taken cover. Tarrant quickly realizes that it looks fake that nobody on the right is reacting so he quickly turns back to the left side of the room.
6:59 As Tarrant turns for a split second back to the left side of the room, we notice a couple of things. First, a man in a gray shirt and jeans is laying on the ground with his head under some kind of furniture. This man didn't appear in the video as Tarrant entered this room shooting. Further, where this man is laying is not even close to the 45 degree angle that Tarrant turned into as he fired. We never see the man in the gray shirt move and it's impossible that he was shot as Tarrant entered the room. Thus, he is most likely a mass casualty dummy. Also note that there is a pile of what appear to be people in the corner that aren't moving. We have to ask why aren't they moving as they would not have been in the 45 degree angle range that Tarrant fired into. Thus, as the gray shirt man and the pile of people were supposed to have already been shot, we must realize what happened here. Tarrant made a minor mistake as he entered the room. As he turned left and fired into this room, Tarrant was supposed to turn his gun a full 90 degrees to the left while firing. Tarrant messed up here.
7:00 to 7:02 Now that our actors know Tarrant is in the room, he quickly turns back to them to catch them on video diving to the floor. This is to show us that they're real people, at least for now.
7:02 to 7:08 A man in khaki pants tries to run by Tarrant but Tarrant apparently kills him and the man falls to the floor. Note that he also has no visible injuries. The man can be seen as Tarrant walks back down the hall. The man is lying in a position with his left leg much more forward than his right leg.
7:19 to 7:30 As Tarrant reenters the large room and continues shooting, the only movement is from two people jumping out of the left side of the room. Nobody is screaming, rolling around in pain, helping others, etc.
7:33 As Tarrant passes the dead man in the hallway in the khaki pants that we saw at 7:02 to 7:08 we can see that the man in khaki pants has moved his right leg so it's directly above his left leg. This is either a new take of this scene or he is making himself more comfortable as the rest of the scene plays out.
7:36 to 7:50 Tarrant again enters the large room and continues shooting. The few actors that were initially in this room have now left. All that remains are mass casualty dummies. Screams from some of the wounded can be heard somewhere. However, it's impossible to determine from where the screams are coming from and none of the injured move whatsoever. If Tarrant heard such screams he likely would have approached the injured to finish them off, like he later does with the girl outside. Thus, I again suspect we are hearing an audio recording edited into this video.
8:00 This time Tarrant reloads in the large room. It's the first time he hasn't reloaded in the hallway. This is a clear sign to us that all of the crisis actors are out of this room. Now, Tarrant will use real bullets. I suspect that when Tarrant inexplicably reloaded in the hallway that it was cover to make edits to the video and to allow the movement in and out of the large room of crisis actors and mass casualty dummies.
8:16 to 8:26 Now that Tarrant has reloaded and is using real bullets, he approaches the "victims" and fires at close range. Now we can see the bullets entering the victims. Although, look close, these are all mass casualty dummies. Remember, mass casualty dummies have been used in at least these events: 1) LAX shooting, 2)Orlando Pulse shooting and 3) Las Vegas concert shooting. This would not be a new trick.
8:32 Tarrant picks up a magazine for his gun from the floor in the hallway. This is the magazine that was already there before Tarrant entered the building that we saw at 6:52 to 6:53. It was mistakenly left there from a prior scene.
8:38 Our man in khaki pants is now fully stretched out and getting comfortable. If he was still alive, Tarrant would have killed him.The man in khaki pants is not good at repeating his exact position from scene to scene.
8:42 The gray shirted man in the doorway from 6:50 has now been dead for 1:52. Although his body is in the exact same position and nearly the same location, we can see that somebody moved the door so that it is now up against his body. Everybody from this room ran away from this doorway. Thus, it's unlikely that somebody ran through this doorway AND moved this door when it was already fully open. Most likely, this was some sort of minor mistake made between scenes.
8:44 As Tarrant leaves the mosque, there are now two bodies laying in the doorway. One is one of the men who has been there from the start. It is unclear where the other man came from as none were seen running out this door. The new body is laying in a pool of blood but curiously, the man who has been there for over two minutes shows no loss of blood. The man who has been there the longest now has his left hand, that was well above his head 6:44, well planted in between the new man's genital area. How does that happen exactly?
8:56 to 9:05 This is the first time that Tarrant shoots outside of the mosque courtyard. Note that the casings from his gun look like they disappear in mid air.
9:08 to 9:09 Tarrant fires three more shots and these shots DEFINITELY DISAPPEAR IN MID AIR. If the shots at 8:56 to 9:05 didn't convince you, these definitely should. This is concrete proof that this video wasn't a live feed and has been edited. I think the producers didn't want this drill to take place with witnesses reporting a live shooting out on the streets and somebody possibly killing actor Tarrant "to stop him". Thus, all shots fired outside of the controlled courtyard were digitally edited in later on.
10:00 to 10:23 Tarrant is on the street firing his new weapon that he just got out of his car. We don't see the casings land on the ground as they are out of view. As the prior shots on the street were digitally altered at 8:56 to 9:05 and 9:08 to 9:09, we can safely say that Tarrant isn't shooting here either. This is an attempt to reinforce to the skeptical viewers that Tarrant is really shooting and is shooting with real bullets.
10:33 The new man in the doorway is laying in a large pool of blood. How did this man cross the white rug next to him without spilling even one drop of blood on it?
10:49 Tarrant has now entered the large room and is firing again. What appears to be the top half of a man can be seen in front of the window to the right. Tarrant fires at it and appears to hit it. Notice the unnatural movement of this half of a person. This is some sort of mechanical dummy placed among a room full of mass casualty dummies to make viewers think there are real people in this room. Thus, it's likely that Tarrant is using real ammunition at this point. No other human movement can be seen at this time.
10:54 Tarrant approaches the "victims" on the right side of the room and begins firing at close range. None of the victims appear to be alive. None are groaning or making any movements at all. They do move when they are hit with bullets. Yet, it is difficult to make out most of their faces and bodies. It is a high probability that these are all mass casualty dummies. To the far right in this scene are two "dead" people on a piece of furniture. These two would not be able to hold such position if they had been killed as they would lose muscle control and fall over.
11:16 and 11:18 Gray shirt man who we first saw at 6:59 , and who has been "dead" from the start despite not getting hit by any bullets, has now moved two feet to the right for this scene from his location at 6:59. Oops. He still is playing dead. Since he is in this room as live ammunition is being used, it's likely that he is simply a misplaced mass casualty dummy.
11:19 Tarrant shoots blue shirt man in the head and blood splatters. This is the most convincing scene for believing this shooting is real. Yet, I will soon tell you why it's not. Remember, we haven't seen this man move at all since 6:53 and he likely has been replace with a mass casualty dummy at some point when Tarrant left the room. Just because he was a real person in one scene doesn't make him a real person in another scene. What is likely going on here is Tarrant shot and hit a blood squib that was planted on the mass casualty dummy. Yes, we have seen blood squibs on numerous occasions in these events. If you don't believe me, go watch "The Boston Unbombing" about the fake Boston Marathon Bombing.
11:21 Tarrant shoots a mass casualty dummy propped up against a wall in a corner.
11:26 to 11:33 Tarrant shoots a pile of mass casualty dummies in the left corner of the room. Again, none of them show any signs that they are real people and not dummies. Zero people so far have had any visible injuries at all.
11:46 to 11:48 There is some impressive trickery that starts here. Tarrant shoots at two girls as they exit the courtyard through a door on a fence.
11:51 to 11:53 Tarrant shoots at one of the girls who is outside of the courtyard. The other seems to inexplicably disappeared. Remember, as we've seen earlier, all shots outside of the courtyard so far have been fake.The reason is to not alarm people outside of the controlled environment of the courtyard where this hoax is taking place. Also, it would be a disaster if somebody not in on the fake event tried to intervene and kill actor Tarrant. Like earlier, we don't see these casings fall anywhere as they are "out of camera range".
11:59 The "girl" that has been shot makes a robotic movement into the street. This is some kind of mechanical dummy. Note, we hear "Help me" in a Muslim voice. Come on now. This audio has been dubbed in. Note the placement of the girl/mechanical dummy in front of the red car parked across the street where Tarrant parked his car using the same marker. Note we never see the girl's/mechanical dummy's face. Three suv's two white that appear to be the same and one black, run interference on the street to block traffic even though no cars are stopped in front of them. The two white suv's make it difficult to match up this scene for video fakery if multiple takes were needed as there would be two of the same reference points (white suv).
12:07 Tarrant approaches and shoots the girl/mechanical dummy in the upper torso. However, the blood squib malfunctions this time! Instead of exploding like it did with the blue shirted man at 11:19, the squib not only doesn't explode but it moves to where it is clearly visible at the girl's right elbow (red square). BIG OOPS! Next, Tarrant shoots the girl/mechanical dummy in the head. The expected result is blood splatter from the head like we saw from the blue shirted man at 11:19. This time, however, the blood squib does detonate but detonates in the wrong location under the girl/mechanical dummy. Note that there was also some kind of device used to fling a piece of hair off of the mechanical dummy. I was originally fooled by this scene until I watched it several times.
The fact that this event is a hoax doesn't change much at all from it being a false flag. I understand that many will find this harder to believe but I just look at what the available evidence is. Frankly, I'm surprised I missed some of these things initially. Anyway, it all makes perfect sense now. It's obvious why the New Zealand government doesn't want this video in the public domain because it doesn't add up to careful scrutiny.
One other thing I wanted to add is the little detail about this playing "live" on Facebook. This is a little trick the producers use so that most can't comprehend that it could be a prerecorded performance. How could they edit the video if it was prerecorded? Well, this is the exact trick that was used in the Charlottesville event that I conclusively proved was a hoax. "Eyewitness" Marissa Blair recorded the Charlottesville event live on a Facebook live stream. The only problem is that I conclusively proved her video to be a prerecorded fake. Thus, like the colors/marker trick stated above, the use of mass casualty dummies, etc. the use of facebook live stream to prove a prerecorded video is live is also a little trick that's used. Of course, this fully implicates Facebook itself in the corruption too.
---- ea non sunt semper quae videntur -----
_____________________________________
Thursday 22 September, 2022
Vatican II Is A New Religion
_________________________________
The Jewish Peril & The Catholic Church
____________________
Censorship Gone Wild
Kurt R. Haskell News & Opinion Blog - 3 April, 2019
Today, I received the following email from New Zealand:
Hi there,
In its role under the Harmful Digital Communications Act 2015 Netsafe receives reports of content online which is causing harm to New Zealanders, this includes objectionable material. We have had a report that footage of the Christchurch shootings has been shared on your site on the following URL:
https://www.kurthaskell.com/blog/why-i-now-believe-the-new-zealand-event-was-a-complete-hoax-with-zero-dead?fbclid=IwAR0z0x_FwKupPCJJU51uz8_KX_RqoJlw4wspuzOQ69PqOIbQJ2cpQyGJzJ8�
The footage of this terrorist attack and the gunman’s manifesto has been classified objectionable in New Zealand by our Chief Censor and is therefore illegal. We politely request that the offending material is removed.
Kind regards, Netsafe
Follow Netsafe on Facebook
Netsafe / 0508 638 723 / www.netsafe.org.nz Our helpline is open from 8am until 8pm Monday to Friday, and from 9am until 5pm on weekends and public holidays.
_________
Yes, censorship is reaching absurd levels. I had to look up what Netsafe actually is.
"Netsafe is New Zealand's independent, non-profit online safety organisation."
So a non profit "safety" agency in New Zealand thinks it can dictate what I post to my website in Costa Rica. Please. By the way, what exactly is unsafe with the Christchurch hoax video?
This garbage organization even dared to tell me that posting the Christchurch video and manifesto is illegal! Ahahahahaha. Little does this trash organization know that they are dealing with an attorney who doesn't fall for nonsensical legal threats. If this organization thinks I did something wrong, then it should send someone from New Zealand to arrest me. Maybe I should ask the "Chief Censor" is such global arrests are in his budget.
Anyway, you can see the absurdity here. My website is not even two months old and my following is not yet large. Yet, New Zealand, a little country across the world, thinks it can tell me what I can post. Even worse, it has the time to target small websites like mine.
The truth is, the New Zealand "Chief Censor" is worried that people that watch the Christchurch video in detail will realize it was a hoax. Absolutely zero people were killed in the Christchurch hoax. The video was badly botched. Therefore, the Chief Censor thinks he can wipe the video out across the Internet. With the censorship attempts from Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, etc. things are reaching critical levels. Now we have small countries that think they can censor the entire internet.
I started writing a very condescending response to this email from Netsafe. Then I reconsidered and decided to not waste my time. Netsafe knows what it's doing is wrong and an email from me won't change that. Netsafe is beholden to the globalists that fund its "non profit" efforts. The only people that want us to not expose fake events are those that pull them off. Therefore, we know who funds Netsafe. I think I'll pass on following Netsafe on Facebook. It's just not my kind of organization.
_______________
Kurt R. Haskell - News & Opinion Blog
Yep, Brenton Tarrant is a Mossad Agent
March 19, 2019
I posted the other day about why I thought the New Zealand false flag shooting was a Zionist controlled operation. Now there is a little more evidence to back up that conclusion.
First of all, let's talk about all of the lovely places Tarrant recently visited:
Bulgaria
Serbia
Montenegro
Ukraine
North Korea
Turkey
and Israel
among others
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2019/03/16/north-korea-pakistan-bulgaria-unusual-travels-new-zealand-shooting-suspect/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.8d5600d8f916
Come on now. Who would visit such places on vacation? Should we believe he wanted to hang out a few days with Kim Jong Un? He also spent 43 days relaxing (or working?) in Turkey just before the uprising, which attempted to overthrow Erdogan.
"The terrorist had entered Turkey in 2016. I believe he spent about 43 days in the country. Now police are trying to find out what he was doing in this country but we can tell from the manifesto that he was very interested in President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, there could have been an assassination plot maybe," said Yusuf Erim.
http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/new-zealand-mosque-attacker-visited-turkey-in-2016-141953
Remember, this a man that hates Muslims! So the fact that he would spend 6 weeks in Turkey is a little far fetched unless he was there working on "something".
Did I also mention that Tarrant is Jewish? (see below). How many mainstream media outlets have described Tarrant as the Jewish shooter that killed 50 Muslims? My guess would be somewhere between 0 and 0.
Oh yes, Tarrant also visited Israel for 9 days in 2016.
"A senior Israeli immigration official said Brenton Tarrant arrived in the country from Turkey on October 25 using his Australian passport, Channel 13 reported.
Tarrant was granted a 90-day tourist visa, and left the country nine days later."
Why would Tarrant visit Israel immediately after he was in Turkey for the failed coup attempt in 2016? Remember, Tarrant wasn't in Israel causing trouble. According to his manifesto, he doesn't mind Jews as long as they stay in their own country.
https://www.timesofisrael.com/new-zealand-mosque-shooting-suspect-reportedly-visited-israel-in-2016/
Therefore, we can determine the following things:
1) Tarrant likely wasn't visiting North Korea for fun (nobody does).
2) Tarrant wasn't visiting Pakistan for fun (he hates Muslims).
3) Tarrant was likely somehow related to the attempted coup on Erdogan.
4) Tarrant's visit to Israel likely wasn't for fun either. Tarrant (doesn't mind) Jews who stay in their own country. Therefore, he doesn't want to be by Jews. Further, the timing of his visit to Israel is suspect as it's just after the Erdogan coup attempt.
5) Tarrant is Jewish and not white.
Thus, Tarant, as I suspected, is very likely an Israeli Mossad agent.
_______________
More From Kurt R. Haskell on False Flag/Hoax Events
The Rise of the Social Justice Warrior Hoax
February 19, 2019
If anyone ever wanted proof that hoaxes are, in fact, taking place, they only need to look into the details of the Jussie Smollett case. Smollett, a Hollywood actor, reported to Chicago police that he was attacked on January 29th by two white men yelling racial and homophobic slurs as well as yelling "this is MAGA country". He further explained that the two assailants wore MAGA ( Make America Great Again) hats during the assault, poured bleach on Smollett and put a noose around Smollett's neck.
To those of us familiar with hoaxes and false flag events, the detail of the MAGA hats reportedly worn by the assailants set off red flags. It made me recall the images of Andrew Pollack and his Trump 2020 shirt on the night of the Parkland event. Tying negative press to Trump is something that the string pullers/hoaxers frequently do. The MAGA hat is to false flags/hoaxes during the Trump administration as the found ISIS flag in the terrorist vehicle was during the Obama administration.
Things soon progressed in the hoax direction when keen observers released the Subway sandwich Smollett was holding during the attack was never dropped or torn apart. Unless Smollett ordered super glue as one of his sub's toppings, the sub remaining intact through this type of attack is unlikely. Smollett then refused to turn over his phone to the police and the plot thickened. Later, the two attackers were found and turned out to be..........Africans from Nigeria. In order to not be charged with battery, the Nigerians spilled the beans on Smollett. They told the police how they were extras on and met Smollett on his show Empire.
They further told the police that the event was a HOAX and they were paid $7000 to be involved. Further, they explained how they had practiced the event with Smollett. Meanwhile, Smollett has hired an attorney, isn't talking and is nowhere to be seen.
After the January 29 attack, the mainstream media blew up with this story. Smollett, by being a gay and African American checks two boxes on the social justice bonus points checklist. Once you add in that Smollett was also an attack victim and such attack was done by Trump supporters, two more social justice warrior boxes were checked. This event then became an almost perfect event to propagandize the social justice warrior cause. Smollett, if the event had been believed, would have been Godlike to the sjw's and his status would have been as untouchable as that of Jews after World War II. Before things unraveled, presidential candidates Kamala Harris and Cory Booker publicized the event as a hate crime. To this day, even after the facts are out, Harris and Booker refuse to take back their pro Smollett rhetoric.
When asked about this event a few hours ago, Harris was speechless and for good reason.
While Harris and Booker seem unrelated to this hoax, I strongly suspect they are not. Smollett is very involved in Democratic politics and pictures of him can be seen all over the internet with various powerful Democratic politicians, including Obama. Harris and Booker are also two sponsors of a nonsensical, unneeded, race baiting anti lynching bill. Such bill passed the house last year but was not voted on in the senate. Now, with Smollett stating that a noose was placed around his neck, the anti lynching bill of Harris and Booker moves to the forefront. By the way, why would someone put a noose around your neck if they weren't going to pull it tight or hang you from a tree? Obviously, Smollett didn't fight off the two very muscular attackers African attempted (black on black) lynchers in order to stop his lynching. With a little critical thinking, the noose around Smollett's neck can be seen for what it really is, a staged prop to promote the anti lynching bill of Harris and Booker.
Why would Smollett, Harris and Booker get involved in this hoax? First of all, there have been rumors that Smollett would be written off of his show Empire. With this event, if it wasn't exposed as a hoax, Smollett would have risen to unheard of levels in social justice culture with four sjw boxes checked. Untold career opportunities would have arisen for Smollett. As for Harris and Booker, their sad acts could be spotted during the Kavanaugh confirmation hearings when all they could due was ask scripted, nonrelevant questions about nonsense. Neither has a viable presidential platform besides checking some sjw boxes. To have even the slightest chance of winning the presidential election, these two must use race baiting politics to the max, with hoaxes like this one. It was not a coincidence that this event took place in Chicago where Obama and Rahm Emmanuel hold considerable power to influence the police and the court system. The back up plan, which will now going into effect, will be to quietly sweep this event under the rug and keep it from being tied to Harris and Booker.
Sadly, what you see with this hoax is a very amateurish job. This hoax does not come close to rising to the level of the Sandy Hook shooting, the Boston Marathon bombing or the Parkland event. In addition, some of the main players, the Nigerians, have already started talking. Therefore, we must conclude it was pulled off with little planning, little budget, and without the help of any three letter agency. Likely, it was pulled off solely by hoaxers, Smollett, Harris and Booker. Look for many more of these racial type hoaxes leading up to the 2020 election to prop up Harris and Booker and their racial division, pro sjw strategies.
___________________
For those unfamiliar with the term 'social justice warrior,' I thought this was a pretty good definition:
Social justice warriors believe in an extreme left-wing ideology that combines feminism, progressivism, and political correctness into a totalitarian system that attempts to censor speech and promote fringe lifestyles while actively discriminating against men, particularly white men. They are the internet activist arm of Western progressivism that acts as a vigilante group to ensure compliance and homogeny of far left thought.
The true definition of SJW is up for debate, but most generally it has become a catch-all term that describes feminists and liberals who actively try to solve the perceived social injustices of modern society by organizing in online communities to disseminate propaganda, censor speech, and punish individuals by getting them terminated from their employment. They have also been successful at positioning themselves in the upper echelons of universities, media organizations, and tech companies.
______________________
The Dangers Of Wearing Face Masks ( Suffocating devices )
Permission To Breathe Freely Sir
Published April 19, 2022
Congrats, they dropped the mask mandates, you got the permission you waited for. What happens when they take it away? Use this time to switch sides in this war between Truth and Lies!
"Every time you put that stupid thing (Face Mask) on in spite of knowing that you shouldn't be, you take the side of the Lies; because if you chose sides in a war between truth versus lies, you were fighting for the Lies! "
Most Mask Wearers Will be Dead or Demented In Ten Years
______________________
Sunday 25 September, 2022
Sedevacantism Debate: Are John XXIII Through Francis True Popes? – Bro. Peter Dimond vs Jeff Cassman
Sedevacantism Debate : Are John XXIII Through Francis True Popes? – Bro. Peter Dimond vs Jeff Cassman
____________________
Tuesday 4 October, 2022
Glad it happened
Sedevacantism Debate: Are John XXIII Through Francis True Popes? – Bro. Peter Dimond vs Jeff Cassman
I’m glad that this debate happened, the viewership is enormous. It went so bad for them that they had to discuss it in their “Churches” and even called for it to be taken down.
It doesn’t matter who faces Bro. Peter to debate this subject, they will be crushed by the facts. Imagine one of those heretics spending... more than the total time for the debate... to... attempt to dissuade people who have been convinced by the sedevacantist position from taking the right step (i.e converting to sedevacantism)…
They have led hundreds of their viewers astray and are ashamed that this has been so exposed in the debate. God arranged this debate to happen probably as a last call for many…
Philip
______________________
Thursday 6 October, 2022
Damage Control
MHFM: Since the recent debate on sedevacantism demonstrated that the Vatican II claimants to the Papacy are not true popes, some defenders of the Vatican II Sect have been trying to do damage control after the debate occurred. They don’t refute anything.
But stay tuned for some interesting responses from us.
________________
Friday 7 October, 2022
_What Kind Of Cloud Is That? Thursday 4th June, 201...___
_______________
Friday 7 October, 2022
