This blog site is devoted to the defence of the Holy Roman Catholic Church, by exposing the false and invalid Second Vatican Council as a non-Catholic heretical Council. We have zeroed in on the one piece of arsenal which most of us have overlooked and failed to employ over these past 40 years since the Vatican II sect was installed in Rome. The one weapon that strikes more terror into the enemies of the Church is the Bulla of Pope Pius II, Execrabilis, which he issued on February 15th, 1460.
John Paul II, To the Roman Curia, Dec. 22, 1986, #7: “The event of Assisi can thus be considered as a visible illustration, a concrete example, a catechesis, intelligible to all, of what is presupposed and signified by the commitment to ecumenism and to the interreligious dialogue which was recommended and promoted by the Second Vatican Council.”
John Paul II, To the Roman Curia, Dec. 22, 1986, #9: “The day of prayer at Assisi, showing the Catholic Church holding the hands of brother Christians, and showing us all joining hands with the brothers of other religions, was a visible expression of these statements of the Second Vatican Council [Lumen Gentium 16; Nostra Aetate 2].”
______________________________________
Comment:
Here we have JPII specifically stating that Vatican II holds and supports the teachings and belief of non Christian religions, that is all the false religions of the world which includes pagans, idolaters etc., and those who venerate JPII will be damned.
Drs. Samantha and Mark Bailey Vs a Corrupt NZ Medical Council
After years of fending off N.Z.s "Medical Council " extortion racket, without asking for help, Dr. Sam Bailey is finally reaching out for assistance.
It seems she now has to make a choice about putting more time, energy and resources into fighting these lunatics, and continuing with her (and her husband Dr.Mark Bailey's) research and consistently providing free paradigm-shifting content to the world.
If we want Sam and Mark to be able to continue their incredible work exposing germ/contagion hoaxes and other deceptions, now is the time - for those who are able - to pitch in with some support. It's incredible that they have persevered so long (6 Years) under the strain of serious on-going attacks by the establishment.
Sam summarized the details of her situation in her latest video linked below and hereis the link to her GiveSendGo page.
Sam and Mark shared more details about their medical council's absurd attack on both of them, in arecent interviewwith Dawn Lester.
Dr. Sam Bailey
__________________________
Dr Samantha Bailey, mother of three boys, author, health educator and former practicing medical doctor for 15 years, now faces NZ$250,000 (US$140,000) in “costs” and fines issued by the New Zealand medical authorities.All for telling the truth.
Background
In early 2020, Dr Sam was one of the first doctors in the world to identify something dreadfully wrong with the COVID narrative. So in March that year she began countering the enormous amount of fear propaganda being promulgated by governments and the corporate media.
Her background in clinical trials, family medicine, and as a popular presenter for a network TV health show, inspired her to publish weekly videos addressing issues such as lockdowns, PCR tests, face masks and the impending vaccines. The public response was overwhelming with millions of views and regular 97-99% approval ratings.
Persecution
However, the Medical Council of New Zealand (MCNZ), an agency linked to the Federation of State Medical Boards, disapproved of Dr Sam’s public popularity and attempted to shut her down. In September 2020, they requested that she sign a ‘Voluntary Undertaking’, effectively a gag order, to prevent her from talking about COVID-19 and related issues. Dr Sam refused the “offer” and continued publishing her research exposing the fraudulent aspects of the COVID narrative and the related vaccines.
The Bailey Family send out their warmest gratitude to all of our wonderful supporters. 🙏
The fundraiser kept up its incredible momentum and the target was reached just inside a week. I cannot tell you how much of a relief this is for me after 6 years of litigation. The best part is that our publications remain, we continue to stand behind them and it is all on the public record.
Now that this can be settled in full, we look forward to doing what we do best and as of this moment are preparing our next publications. We can't wait to share this with you and perhaps, ruffle the feathers of the medical establishment a little more 😉
Come and hear, all you who fear God; let me tell you what he has done for me. — Psalm 66:16
Two months since the psyop of the year, the Charlie Kirk hoaxassination continues to be fake boosted by the algorithm and a desperate effort by the Erikatards to keep it real. Ask Grok to tell you where he’s buried, suggesting it’s a little odd we haven’t been told yet, and it will accuse you of being a tin foil hat 🙄.
Asset Candace isn’t doing much for the cause with her cringe Charlie texts pretending Israel took him out. But some who claim to be sentient still believe the charade, so in the hope of reaching them, here’s the latest round-up of fakery condensed to six minutes.
Gemma O'Doherty's Substack is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
So let me get this straight. Charlie Kirk had no disclosed coroner’s report. No church funeral; no burial site or grave has been disclosed. Erica posts videos of her slobbering over her dead husband’s plastic looking hand at the wake, but no photos from the burial. Head of school security standing on the elevated garage calmly watching right after the shooting and takes no action.
No official death certificate. What was the doctor’s name who worked on Charlie at the hospital? Where is the autopsy report? No ballistics report other than a fantastical story about a magical bullet that would make JFK’s bullet jealous. Not a single credible eyewitness on the record.
Video footage of chairs morphing through tables. Impossible video anomalies like the bullet wound not moving when Charlie’s body moves proving he was not actually shot or used a squib device to fake it. It proves a real time rotoscoping AI overlay was used.
Is it not odd that there was no bullet exit wound from a 30-06 bullet that would leave a hole the size of a watermelon on a buffalo? How do you explain YouTube continually showing the most gory footage when they never allow things far less gory? Think trauma-based mind control and an award-winning widow already taking over Charlie’s show. Why was the entire crime scene destroyed within hours erasing vital evidence? Why were there no paramedics on the scene?
When Charlie was carried out, people were filming in strange places and not following the action. Kind of like they are staged there to get a specific shot and then move on. How come the men carrying Charlie did not have any blood on them? Why was Charlie Kirk’s body removed and flown out on Air Force Two? Why did Donald Trump pardon a Navy SEAL killer whose shadow looms over this case?
Was the stadium mysteriously booked by Turning Point four months before his death? Do you think it was just a coincidence that the memorial with 80,000 hearts excreting louche energy was right at the time of the lunar eclipse? Do you find it odd that Erika Kirk was wiping her non existent tears and with perfect make-up applied at her beloved husband’s circus memorial? How was a massive high-tech stadium memorial produced in only 11 days? Why do multiple women publicly appear as Erika Kirk raising questions of identity?
Where are the birth certificates for their children? School records? No names revealed, no faces ever shown. If you are claiming that you are private people, why take photos and videos of the backs of your children’s head to show publicly? Where is a video of Charlie playing with his children at a birthday party or picnic or any other family setting?
Why do freemasonic and satanic symbols surround this tragedy with chilling precision - Kash Patel specifically pointing out it took 33 hours to capture the killer? Do you find it odd that two weeks prior to this event South Park did an episode of Charlie Kirk getting attacked? Do you find it disturbing that Charlie Kirk, who denounced drinking alcohol in his Christianity preachings, was one of the early heavy investors in a company called Happy Dad which makes a hard seltzer where he made millions?
Is it weird that there is no video of the alleged shooter Tyler Robinson taking the shot?The footage released starts when he is halfway across the roof in an impossible time frame for when the alleged shot was fired and a shadow disappears for no reason. This reminds me of the Selenelian lunar eclipse. It’s impossible. Why do all the family photos of Tyler Robinson look like they are photoshopped and Tyler is always on the outside? Isn’t it interesting Kash Patel fired many of the heads of the FBI in that area days before the shooting?
Tucker Carlson, who was allegedly a good friend, could not stop laughing at Charlie’s WWE Stadium memorial service. Do you find it interesting that Charlie sold his house eight months ago for $6.5 million? Is it curious that Erika started a non-profit child rescue working alongside the United States military in Romania and during that time Romania had a massive uptick in child trafficking. She worked alongside Colonel Busher who was charged with child sex trafficking and prostitution. If the father of your two young children was just brutally murdered for the world to see days ago, do you leave them home with the nanny while you go on podcasts grinning from ear to ear?
Is it not curious that a 17-year-old first time Donald Trump beauty pageant contestant won and now Trump appointed a top Attorney General woman who has no experience who was also in his beauty pageant? This is only a fraction of the clues and evidence on this psyop. For those of you brave enough to look at the evidence while removing the preconceived emotions, the conclusion is undeniable.
Gemma O'Doherty's Substack is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
A former gang member named Dominic Morrow, who was shot twice and considered medically dead for 3 minutes in 2009, tells his powerful story of having experienced Hell.
Why I Now Believe the New Zealand Event Was a Complete Hoax With Zero Dead
I've spent a considerable amount of time thinking about the New Zealand
event. I've watched the video of the shooting many, many times and
second by second in many spots. I've thought about why it's being
treated as a censorship and gun grab tool. I've wondered why the
manifesto and its contents were put out there. I've thought about all of
the ramifications of each detail. Now I'm going to explain why I think
the entire event was nothing but a theatrical production where
ABSOLUTELY NOBODY was killed or injured. It has taken me several days to
finally draw this logical conclusion. Now I'm going to tell you exactly
why. Feel free to agree or disagree.
I'm going to specifically reference different parts of the shooting
video. Once again, here is the video for you to follow along:
3:05 to 4:20 While driving to the Mosque Brenton Tarrant inexplicably
pulls off to the side of the road and waits. He's not doing anything in
the car here. You can see his right hand on the steering wheel for most
of the time. As a person in red gets within view of his car, Tarrant
makes a quick signal to the person with his right hand. This is a, "I'm
your guy and I see you" signal. Just as the person in red walks past
Tarrant's car, Tarrant continues driving to the Mosque. The person in
red is making sure Tarrant is there and giving Tarrant the signal to
start the event. We've seen this sort of thing before. Remember the Ft.
Lauderdale airport event from 2017? Well, in that event there which took
place in January, there was a man dressed in all green with a white
beard that looked like Santa Claus. As each person ran up to this man,
they took a left. He was the signal to run left.
4:57 to 5:05 While continuing the drive to the mosque, Tarrant is again
looking for someone dressed in red as an indicator of where to turn.
However, the street is lined with cars obstructing his view. As Tarrant
is almost past the turn into the mosque, he sees the second person
dressed in red. Tarrant slams on the brakes and makes a quick left turn.
However, because he saw the second man in red so late, he partially
drove past the turn. Tarrant then had to reverse his car backward before
continuing into the mosque because he saw the man so late and partially
missed the turn.
5:50 to 6:00 Tarrant gets a bit confused looking for where he is
supposed to park. He knows it's at the end of an alley facing onto a
main road with a red car parked directly across the street. It takes him
a few seconds to locate the red car but he manages just fine.
6:20 to 6:26 Tarrant gets out of his car with a large rifle. He turns
right and begins walking on a sidewalk to the mosque. Two people are
directly in front of him next to a red car and look right at him.
Neither person is alarmed or afraid that Tarrant is carrying a gun. We
can rule out the possibility that Tarrant wasn't carrying the gun here
as you can see the gun barrel in several frames. Thus, the lack of
reaction by these two people tell me they are in on the event. When
Tarrant reaches the two people by the red car, he takes a right into the
mosque courtyard. Note that we have now had FOUR red markers.
6:35 to 6:42 Tarrant starts firing inside the mosque courtyard. Note the
casing from his eighth shot hits one wall and ricochets into another
wall. This tells us these casings are likely not digitally added but are
real casings. Two men can be seen standing in the doorway when Tarrant
begins firing. One falls in the doorway and the other crawls inside. The
scene inside the doorway isn't clear. I think there may have been an
edit here where Tarrant fired a real gun in one video and the scene was
combined with the men standing in the doorway falling. I'm not sure but
something strange is going on here.
6:44 Note that there are no visible wounds on the man laying in the doorway.
6:47 A woman's voice screams out in agony but no women have yet been
shot. An audio soundtrack has been edited into this video. Thus, it's
not a live video.
6:50 Note that there is a man with a gray shirt laying in the doorway to
the right. In addition, note that the door is fully open and the man's
right arm is approximately one foot from the door. He appears dead.
Further note that people are fleeing this room out the back door.
6:52 to 6:53 As Tarrant walks down the hall, a magazine for his gun can
be seen on the floor to the left. Tarant will pick up this magazine from
this exact location at 8:32. This is the exact staging area where
Tarrant later reloads. Thus, it appears this scene had multiple takes
with a magazine being mistakenly left from a prior scene.
6:52 to 6:53 During this same time period, a man in blue runs across the
doorway at the end of the hall and appears to be shot by Tarrant.
PLEASE NOTE THE PSYCHOLOGICAL TRICKERY TAKING PLACE HERE! You just saw
that this is a real person in blue. Later you'll see him get shot in the
head. What you can't wrap your mind around, however, is that between
these two scenes, the man in blue is switched out for a mass casualty
dummy with a blood pack. Tarrant is shooting something here but most
likely blanks or some kind of special effects gun so that nobody gets
injured.
6:57 Tarrant reaches the end of the hall and is now firing into the
large room. He fires straight ahead and left, but only up to a 45 degree
angle. His shots won't be able to hit anyone farther left than 45
degrees because he didn't turn far enough left.
6:57 to 6:58 Tarrant turns to fire right. Although Tarrant has been
firing his weapon for 23 seconds now, including several shots within
this room, nobody on the right side of the room has reacted or taken
cover. Tarrant quickly realizes that it looks fake that nobody on the
right is reacting so he quickly turns back to the left side of the room.
6:59 As Tarrant turns for a split second back to the left side of the
room, we notice a couple of things. First, a man in a gray shirt and
jeans is laying on the ground with his head under some kind of
furniture. This man didn't appear in the video as Tarrant entered this
room shooting. Further, where this man is laying is not even close to
the 45 degree angle that Tarrant turned into as he fired. We never see
the man in the gray shirt move and it's impossible that he was shot as
Tarrant entered the room. Thus, he is most likely a mass casualty dummy.
Also note that there is a pile of what appear to be people in the
corner that aren't moving. We have to ask why aren't they moving as they
would not have been in the 45 degree angle range that Tarrant fired
into. Thus, as the gray shirt man and the pile of people were supposed to have already been shot,
we must realize what happened here. Tarrant made a minor mistake as he
entered the room. As he turned left and fired into this room, Tarrant
was supposed to turn his gun a full 90 degrees to the left while firing.
Tarrant messed up here.
7:00 to 7:02 Now that our actors know Tarrant is in the room, he quickly
turns back to them to catch them on video diving to the floor. This is
to show us that they're real people, at least for now.
7:02 to 7:08 A man in khaki pants tries to run by Tarrant but Tarrant
apparently kills him and the man falls to the floor. Note that he also
has no visible injuries. The man can be seen as Tarrant walks back down
the hall. The man is lying in a position with his left leg much more
forward than his right leg.
7:19 to 7:30 As Tarrant reenters the large room and continues shooting,
the only movement is from two people jumping out of the left side of the
room. Nobody is screaming, rolling around in pain, helping others, etc.
7:33 As Tarrant passes the dead man in the hallway in the khaki pants
that we saw at 7:02 to 7:08 we can see that the man in khaki pants has
moved his right leg so it's directly above his left leg. This is either a
new take of this scene or he is making himself more comfortable as the
rest of the scene plays out.
7:36 to 7:50 Tarrant again enters the large room and continues shooting.
The few actors that were initially in this room have now left. All that
remains are mass casualty dummies. Screams from some of the wounded can
be heard somewhere. However, it's impossible to determine from where
the screams are coming from and none of the injured move whatsoever. If
Tarrant heard such screams he likely would have approached the injured
to finish them off, like he later does with the girl outside. Thus, I
again suspect we are hearing an audio recording edited into this video.
8:00 This time Tarrant reloads in the large room. It's the first time he
hasn't reloaded in the hallway. This is a clear sign to us that all of
the crisis actors are out of this room. Now, Tarrant will use real
bullets. I suspect that when Tarrant inexplicably reloaded in the
hallway that it was cover to make edits to the video and to allow the
movement in and out of the large room of crisis actors and mass casualty
dummies.
8:16 to 8:26 Now that Tarrant has reloaded and is using real bullets, he
approaches the "victims" and fires at close range. Now we can see the
bullets entering the victims. Although, look close, these are all mass
casualty dummies. Remember, mass casualty dummies have been used in at
least these events: 1) LAX shooting, 2)Orlando Pulse shooting and 3) Las
Vegas concert shooting. This would not be a new trick.
8:32 Tarrant picks up a magazine for his gun from the floor in the
hallway. This is the magazine that was already there before Tarrant
entered the building that we saw at 6:52 to 6:53. It was mistakenly left
there from a prior scene.
8:38 Our man in khaki pants is now fully stretched out and getting
comfortable. If he was still alive, Tarrant would have killed him.The
man in khaki pants in not good at repeating his exact position from
scene to scene.
8:42 The gray shirted man in the doorway from 6:50 has now been dead for
1:52. Although his body is in the exact same position and nearly the
same location, we can see that somebody moved the door so that it is now
up against his body. Everybody from this room ran away from this
doorway. Thus, it's unlikely that somebody ran through this doorway AND
moved this door when it was already fully open. Most likely, this was
some sort of minor mistake made between scenes.
8:44 As Tarrant leaves the mosque, there are now two bodies laying in
the doorway. One is one of the men who has been there from the start. It
is unclear where the other man came from as none were seen running out
this door. The new body is laying in a pool of blood but curiously, the
man who has been there for over two minutes shows no loss of blood. The
man who has been there the longest now has his left hand, that was well
above his head 6:44, well planted in between the new man's genital area.
How does that happen exactly?
8:56 to 9:05 This is the first time that Tarrant shoots outside of the
mosque courtyard. Note that the casings from his gun look like they
disappear in mid air.
9:08 to 9:09 Tarrant fires three more shots and these shots DEFINITELY
DISAPPEAR IN MID AIR. If the shots at 8:56 to 9:05 didn't convince you,
these definitely should. This is concrete proof that this video wasn't a
live feed and has been edited. I think the producers didn't want this
drill to take place with witnesses reporting a live shooting out on the
streets and somebody possibly killing actor Tarrant "to stop him". Thus,
all shots fired outside of the controlled courtyard were digitally
edited in later on.
10:00 to 10:23 Tarrant is on the street firing his new weapon that he
just got out of his car. We don't see the casings land on the ground as
they are out of view. As the prior shots on the street were digitally
altered at 8:56 to 9:05 and 9:08 to 9:09, we can safely say that Tarrant
isn't shooting here either. This is an attempt to reinforce to the
skeptical viewers that Tarrant is really shooting and is shooting with
real bullets.
10:33 The new man in the doorway is laying in a large pool of blood. How
did this man cross the white rug next to him without spilling even one
drop of blood on it?
10:49 Tarrant has now entered the large room and is firing again. What
appears to be the top half of a man can be seen in front of the window
to the right. Tarrant fires at it and appears to hit it. Notice the
unnatural movement of this half of a person. This is some sort of
mechanical dummy placed among a room full of mass casualty dummies to
make viewers think there are real people in this room. Thus, it's likely
that Tarrant is using real ammunition at this point. No other human
movement can be seen at this time.
10:54 Tarrant approaches the "victims" on the right side of the room and
begins firing at close range. None of the victims appear to be alive.
None are groaning or making any movements at all. They do move when they
are hit with bullets. Yet, it is difficult to make out most of their
faces and bodies. It is a high probability that these are all mass
casualty dummies. To the far right in this scene are two "dead" people
on a piece of furniture. These two would not be able to hold such
position if they had been killed as they would lose muscle control and
fall over.
11:16 and 11:18 Gray shirt man who we first saw at 6:59 , and who has
been "dead" from the start despite not getting hit by any bullets, has
now moved two feet to the right for this scene from his location at
6:59. Oops. He still is playing dead. Since he is in this room as live
ammunition is being used, it's likely that he is simply a misplaced mass
casualty dummy.
11:19 Tarrant shoots blue shirt man in the head and blood splatters.
This is the most convincing scene for believing this shooting is real.
Yet, I will soon tell you why it's not. Remember, we haven't seen this
man move at all since 6:53 and he likely has been replace with a mass
casualty dummy at some point when Tarrant left the room. Just because he
was a real person in one scene doesn't make him a real person in
another scene. What is likely going on here is Tarrant shot and hit a
blood squib that was planted on the mass casualty dummy. Yes, we have
seen blood squibs on numerous occasions in these events. If you don't
believe me, go watch "The Boston Unbombing" about the fake Boston
Marathon Bombing.
11:21 Tarrant shoots a mass casualty dummy propped up against a wall in a corner.
11:26 to 11:33 Tarrant shoots a pile of mass casualty dummies in the
left corner of the room. Again, none of them show any signs that they
are real people and not dummies. Zero people so far have had any visible
injuries at all.
11:46 to 11:48 There is some impressive trickery that starts here.
Tarrant shoots at two girls as they exit the courtyard through a door on
a fence.
11:51 to 11:53 Tarrant shoots at one of the girls who is outside of the
courtyard. The other seems to inexplicably disappeared. Remember, as
we've seen earlier, all shots outside of the courtyard so far have been
fake.The reason is to not alarm people outside of the controlled
environment of the courtyard where this hoax is taking place. Also, it
would be a disaster if somebody not in on the fake event tried to
intervene and kill actor Tarrant. Like earlier, we don't see these
casings fall anywhere as they are "out of camera range".
11:59 The "girl" that has been shot makes a robotic movement into the
street. This is some kind of mechanical dummy. Note, we hear "Help me"
in a Muslim voice. Come on now. This audio has been dubbed in. Note the
placement of the girl/mechanical dummy in front of the red car parked
across the street where Tarrant parked his card using the same marker.
Note we never see the girl's/mechanical dummy's face. Three suv's two
white that appear to be the same and one black, run interference on the
street to block traffic even though no cars are stopped in front of
them. The two white suv's make it difficult to match up this scene for
video fakery if multiple takes were needed as there would be two of the
same reference points (white suv).
12:07 Tarrant approaches and shoots the girl/mechanical dummy in the
upper torso. However, the blood squib malfunctions this time! Instead of
exploding like it did with the blue shirted man at 11:19, the squib not
only doesn't explode but it moves to where it is clearly visible at the
girl's right elbow (red square). BIG OOPS! Next, Tarrant shoots the
girl/mechanical dummy in the head. The expected result is blood splatter
from the head like we saw from the blue shirted man at 11:19. This
time, however, the blood squib does detonate but detonates in the wrong
location under the girl/mechanical dummy. Note that there was also some
kind of device used to fling a piece of hair off of the mechanical
dummy. I was originally fooled by this scene until I watched it several
times.
The fact that this event is a hoax doesn't change much at all from it
being a false flag. I understand that many will find this harder to
believe but I just look at what the available evidence is. Frankly, I'm
surprised I missed some of these things initially. Anyway, it all makes
perfect sense now. It's obvious why the New Zealand government doesn't
want this video in the public domain because it doesn't add up to
careful scrutiny.
One other thing I wanted to add is the little detail about this playing
"live" on Facebook. This is a little trick the producers use so that
most can't comprehend that it could be a prerecorded performance. How
could they edit the video if it was prerecorded? Well, this is the exact
trick that was used in the Charlottesville event that I conclusively
proved was a hoax. "Eyewitness" Marissa Blair recorded the
Charlottesville event live on a Facebook live stream. The only problem
is that I conclusively proved her video to be a prerecorded fake. Thus,
like the colors/marker trick stated above, the use of mass casualty
dummies, etc. the use of facebook live stream to prove a prerecorded
video is live is also a little trick that's used. Of course, this fully
implicates Facebook itself in the corruption too.
__________________________________
Would the real Tarrant please stand up - Two different Tarrants!
Two entirely different people!!
____________
More than $3m paid out to mosque victims and families
30 April 2019, 7:52pm
That is amazing considering no one absolutely no one was killed in the Christchurch Mosque "Shooting Hoax"
Victim
Support has now distributed more than $3 million to the victims and
families of those affected by the Christchurch terror attacks.
Chief
executive Kevin Tso said two rounds of financial support have already
been provided to 47 families of those who were killed and 80 people who
were hospitalised.
In the past few days, another 53 injured people have come forward or been identified as needing help.
"These
are exceptional times and finding all those who need our help is an
extremely complex process, which takes time," Mr Tso said.
"We
have been working closely with the Muslim community, hundreds of
victims, the police, and government agencies to try to reach everyone
who has been affected, to understand their needs and to make sure they
are getting appropriate support."
So far, 977 people have registered with Victim Support and that number continues to climb.
Victim
Support contacts victims via police referral and the two organisations
have been trying to ensure no one is missing from the list of those
affected.
Victim Support raised more than $10m in the aftermath of the mosque shootings.
It has been under pressure to distribute more of the funds, as stories emerge of families struggling financially.
A
$15,000 lump sum was paid to the families of each deceased person on 18
March, including $5000 from the Ministry of Justice Victim Assistance
Scheme.
A second payment of $15,000 was made to families from 18 April.
Hospitalised victims received a first payment of $5000 three days after the incident and a second, of $8000, on 18 April.
In
addition to the payments, grants have also been given to help cover
immediate expenses resulting from the incident, including funeral
expenses, travel, accommodation and other discretionary costs. Each is
assessed on a case-by-case basis.
Victim Support is now working through how the rest of the money will be allocated.
Mr Tso said they remain committed to ensuring all money donated is distributed to the victims and their families.
"We
also know that many of the victims will need ongoing support in the
months and years ahead, so we want to make sure the funds are managed
carefully to provide support in the long-term," he said.
___________________________________
Those Shoes absolutely necessary to accompany shooting hoaxes - trademark
